HushSarah
Scorpio Slayer
Just finished my re watch of Season 4 and it keeps dawning on me why I always preferred Riley for Buffy more than Spike and yes, even Angel.
Spike was a prominent character in S4, his character more or less introduced The Initiative in full view. One could argue the Scoobies wouldn't have known if Spike never told them, but I believe there would have been another way if the writers actually had allowed one, but no, Spike was used as a plot device to carry the rest of the season. Had to be him, because reasons.
Now, for Riley, this guy gets a lot of hate, why? Stuff I heard over the years really confuse me and they are never really explained. He's boring. He's human. He's not Angel or Spike. No super powers. Buffy can take him in a battle and win. He's a slightly but not much better version of Xander. He's just a pretty boy, a Gary Stu love interest. I heard it all, and they sound like excuses. But to me, Riley was the most personal character on the show, not just because he was a human who was flawed, like Buffy is. But he was someone who always stood by what was right and owned up to being controlled and brainwashed by the people he called family. It was all he knew and he survived. It flusters me that he doesn't get enough credit for any of that.
To me, he seemed more closer to Buffy than Xander, sure you can say the latter because they are both men, but when we look at it for the bigger picture, Buffy always felt closer. The calling to do what's right. Protect the innocent at all costs. Living a double life. Self-sacrifice. Friends who follow their lead. Get knocked down but rise up stronger than before. They were too similar, supposing that was where the boring part would come in because he was a mirror. As for who Buffy really is, wouldn't she want an equal version of herself to take on the world with? It just seemed like she never really appreciated what Riley gave her and more. I haven't seen a man more selfless. Even Angel, as great as he had been early on, had his irredeemable moments, calling their relationship outrightly a "freak show," and the when he left Sunnydale.
Season 5 revealed Buffy's selfishness toward Riley's value. It was sad when he left, I hated the writers for building him up to be this virile, strong provider only to tear him down to push Spike right in his place. Riley courted Buffy, taking an active interest in who she is, not only as the slayer but Buffy at heart, while Spike always stalked her, had cult shrines to her, played on her emotions, used her, spat her out, dumped her to a corner, turned her friends against her, literally raped her body and her mind. When he got his soul it wasn't a redemption, it felt like another way Spike can manipulate and control Buffy at her most vulnerable like he always did. There is that guy, the player, the opportunist, that was Spike, and Joss really rammed his character against Buffy. Riley was the man she should have been with, this proved more evident in "As You Were." The entire episode was Buffy stuck in jealously and regret while finding out about Spike's newest betrayal. Too much damage was done, she couldn't go back in time but she can still save her soul and that's why she ended her toxic relationship with Spike by the end of the episode.
My question to everyone is why? Why was Spike pushed so much to be Buffy's one and only but never truly earned that place in the story? There were so many more stories to tell with Riley. For those who hated him, I'll ask, why? There was no reason. One cannot argue that the show had felt lost after the UC Sunnydale college years, that was the last hurray for great, creative and innovative stories, while Spike played the pratfall manipulator antagonist, but we are meant to just accept he truly loved Buffy underneath it all?
Spike was a prominent character in S4, his character more or less introduced The Initiative in full view. One could argue the Scoobies wouldn't have known if Spike never told them, but I believe there would have been another way if the writers actually had allowed one, but no, Spike was used as a plot device to carry the rest of the season. Had to be him, because reasons.
Now, for Riley, this guy gets a lot of hate, why? Stuff I heard over the years really confuse me and they are never really explained. He's boring. He's human. He's not Angel or Spike. No super powers. Buffy can take him in a battle and win. He's a slightly but not much better version of Xander. He's just a pretty boy, a Gary Stu love interest. I heard it all, and they sound like excuses. But to me, Riley was the most personal character on the show, not just because he was a human who was flawed, like Buffy is. But he was someone who always stood by what was right and owned up to being controlled and brainwashed by the people he called family. It was all he knew and he survived. It flusters me that he doesn't get enough credit for any of that.
To me, he seemed more closer to Buffy than Xander, sure you can say the latter because they are both men, but when we look at it for the bigger picture, Buffy always felt closer. The calling to do what's right. Protect the innocent at all costs. Living a double life. Self-sacrifice. Friends who follow their lead. Get knocked down but rise up stronger than before. They were too similar, supposing that was where the boring part would come in because he was a mirror. As for who Buffy really is, wouldn't she want an equal version of herself to take on the world with? It just seemed like she never really appreciated what Riley gave her and more. I haven't seen a man more selfless. Even Angel, as great as he had been early on, had his irredeemable moments, calling their relationship outrightly a "freak show," and the when he left Sunnydale.
Season 5 revealed Buffy's selfishness toward Riley's value. It was sad when he left, I hated the writers for building him up to be this virile, strong provider only to tear him down to push Spike right in his place. Riley courted Buffy, taking an active interest in who she is, not only as the slayer but Buffy at heart, while Spike always stalked her, had cult shrines to her, played on her emotions, used her, spat her out, dumped her to a corner, turned her friends against her, literally raped her body and her mind. When he got his soul it wasn't a redemption, it felt like another way Spike can manipulate and control Buffy at her most vulnerable like he always did. There is that guy, the player, the opportunist, that was Spike, and Joss really rammed his character against Buffy. Riley was the man she should have been with, this proved more evident in "As You Were." The entire episode was Buffy stuck in jealously and regret while finding out about Spike's newest betrayal. Too much damage was done, she couldn't go back in time but she can still save her soul and that's why she ended her toxic relationship with Spike by the end of the episode.
My question to everyone is why? Why was Spike pushed so much to be Buffy's one and only but never truly earned that place in the story? There were so many more stories to tell with Riley. For those who hated him, I'll ask, why? There was no reason. One cannot argue that the show had felt lost after the UC Sunnydale college years, that was the last hurray for great, creative and innovative stories, while Spike played the pratfall manipulator antagonist, but we are meant to just accept he truly loved Buffy underneath it all?
T
thrasherpix
I plan to tackle this tonight or tomorrow, but also wanted to add to those who hate Xander for Angel envy, jealousy, being an entitled jerk at times but loving Spike so much who was all these things even worse: why?