zobothehobo
Scooby
Ok, so I've heard people say time and time again that Spuffy is selfish. Most recently in the thread This Year's Girl created about her inability to choose between Spuffy and Bangel because of her ability to see the ups and downs of both equally. ranidann said "And this exemplifies why I love Bangel. Spuffy is selfish; spike would never sacrifice his own pleasure for someone else." And once again, I was overcome with the familiar confusion of "what is she talking about?" I just don't get how Spuffy is so much more selfish than any other love, particularly on Spike's side.
I can sorta see season 6. Buffy used him; he manipulated her to believe she had to. It took me a really long time to see the second, I worked really hard at it. In my latest re-watch, I looked for that and paid special attention to it, and I still only partially see it... But I do see it now.
But what about seasons 5 and 7 (and the soul at the end of season 6)? This is where I get really confused. I've heard people say that because Spike changed with Buffy in mind, because he got his soul to give her what she deserves, he was doing it for selfish reasons because she wanted to be with her... But if you're going to say that, how can you say that not everything anyone ever does for love is selfish? Example: you have a fight with your girlfriend/boyfriend/etc and you feel bad about it... You feel about it, so you apologize in some way. Using this logic, couldn't one say "you apologized so they'd take you back and therefore the apology is selfish." Or how about any time anyone makes any changes to themselves for love. When my mother's husband moved in, he was a jerk. He thought about himself and my mother only. It took a while, but finally after he completely wrecked mother's day last year (to the point I'm dreading this year), my mother stood up and said that was no longer acceptable. That we, her children, mattered too. Almost instantly we saw some changes in his behavior. He stopped treating us like "the help" and the "extras" lying around the house, and started treating us like people. Sometimes he messed up, but he was actively trying to change for my mother. I thought that was just something he should have done anyway, but the fact that he was changing, even if for my mom, meant something. Using the logic applied to Spuffy's love being selfish... you could say that treating me and my sisters well was selfish because he wanted to stay with my mom. That's just such a bleak way of looking at love.
How about the selfishness of Bangel through this logic? The biggest one that's glaring me in the face is season 3. From the beginning of season 3 Bangel with Buffy keeping Angel's return a secret (which I do get... but it is selfish) it was selfish. The only selfless part of Bangel season 3 is when Angel left. And honestly, I think it's a tad debatable (and I think that because I've debated it with my sister). Even the concept of Bangel season 3 though is selfish. I mean after the events of season 2, that Buffy would even continue a relationship with him is selfish beyond belief.
Using the logic of Spuffy being selfish because Spike changed for Buffy.. the changes Angel made to his life, to his lifestyle, just so he could be there in Sunnydale... selfish. Even the fact he was there is selfish. Oh and then he didn't tell Buffy he was a vampire straight away... he lied.
Hell even Angel showing up at the prom (that lovely event voted one of the most romantic gestures on some list a couple days ago) can be seen as selfish because Angel wanted Buffy to be happy.
My point is, all love is selfish if we look at it that way. Every present we buy, every romantic gesture we make can be seen as selfish because we want to be with the other person and/or we want them to be happy. But we do! Spike did! Angel did! Buffy did! And there's nothing wrong with it. That's what happens when you love someone. You want to be close to them and you want them to love you back and most importantly, you want them to be happy. So how is Spuffy so much more selfish than any other love? I honestly don't understand.
Wow, that turned out a lot longer than I expected!!!
I can sorta see season 6. Buffy used him; he manipulated her to believe she had to. It took me a really long time to see the second, I worked really hard at it. In my latest re-watch, I looked for that and paid special attention to it, and I still only partially see it... But I do see it now.
But what about seasons 5 and 7 (and the soul at the end of season 6)? This is where I get really confused. I've heard people say that because Spike changed with Buffy in mind, because he got his soul to give her what she deserves, he was doing it for selfish reasons because she wanted to be with her... But if you're going to say that, how can you say that not everything anyone ever does for love is selfish? Example: you have a fight with your girlfriend/boyfriend/etc and you feel bad about it... You feel about it, so you apologize in some way. Using this logic, couldn't one say "you apologized so they'd take you back and therefore the apology is selfish." Or how about any time anyone makes any changes to themselves for love. When my mother's husband moved in, he was a jerk. He thought about himself and my mother only. It took a while, but finally after he completely wrecked mother's day last year (to the point I'm dreading this year), my mother stood up and said that was no longer acceptable. That we, her children, mattered too. Almost instantly we saw some changes in his behavior. He stopped treating us like "the help" and the "extras" lying around the house, and started treating us like people. Sometimes he messed up, but he was actively trying to change for my mother. I thought that was just something he should have done anyway, but the fact that he was changing, even if for my mom, meant something. Using the logic applied to Spuffy's love being selfish... you could say that treating me and my sisters well was selfish because he wanted to stay with my mom. That's just such a bleak way of looking at love.
How about the selfishness of Bangel through this logic? The biggest one that's glaring me in the face is season 3. From the beginning of season 3 Bangel with Buffy keeping Angel's return a secret (which I do get... but it is selfish) it was selfish. The only selfless part of Bangel season 3 is when Angel left. And honestly, I think it's a tad debatable (and I think that because I've debated it with my sister). Even the concept of Bangel season 3 though is selfish. I mean after the events of season 2, that Buffy would even continue a relationship with him is selfish beyond belief.
Using the logic of Spuffy being selfish because Spike changed for Buffy.. the changes Angel made to his life, to his lifestyle, just so he could be there in Sunnydale... selfish. Even the fact he was there is selfish. Oh and then he didn't tell Buffy he was a vampire straight away... he lied.
Hell even Angel showing up at the prom (that lovely event voted one of the most romantic gestures on some list a couple days ago) can be seen as selfish because Angel wanted Buffy to be happy.
My point is, all love is selfish if we look at it that way. Every present we buy, every romantic gesture we make can be seen as selfish because we want to be with the other person and/or we want them to be happy. But we do! Spike did! Angel did! Buffy did! And there's nothing wrong with it. That's what happens when you love someone. You want to be close to them and you want them to love you back and most importantly, you want them to be happy. So how is Spuffy so much more selfish than any other love? I honestly don't understand.
Wow, that turned out a lot longer than I expected!!!
S
sisterofmercy
Very well said!
S
StarSlayer
[No message]