2009 Golden Globe Nominations

Thanks for posting the winners goldenboy, I was just heading in here to do it 🙂

Okay so my thoughts... Well I loved them, but I always enjoy watching, even if my favorites don't win, which they didn't tonight for the most part 🙁 The night, though, BELONGED to Kate Winslet, and I was SO happy for her. Two awards in one night, and I can't wait to see her films! Her speeches were the only ones that brought me to tears, both times... she was so heartfelt and happy and genuine, it was a true joy to watch 🙂

I was VERY dissapointed that The Curious Case of Benjamin Button didn't pick up any awards, I was really hoping Brad Pitt would take it, I felt he truly deserved it for that role, but oh well. Anna Paquin winning for True Blood I'm really conflicted about. I enjoy the show, I do... but I just don't feel her performance merrited a win... yet, it should have been Sally Field IMO. Colin Farrell's speech was great too, he was so excited he was shaking, it was so cute, AND he looked DAMN good!

Heath won, as expected, it was bittersweet but lovely, I do feel its deserving for an actor that showed so much promise to be recognized for his final work, because had he remained with us there is no doubt he would have racked these awards up in his lifetime.

MY Downey was there and looked GORGEOUS, but I was sad that he got to the red carpet late and I never even got to hear him speak, I had to do with the random times they showed him and his dazzeling smile in the audience :biggrin:

Drew Barrymore, love her to death, but she was really acting so oddly all night, it was a bit off-putting, can't put my finger on it, its like she came across as a bit fake... And Gina Torres was there, as Laurence Fishburne's date... am I the only one that didn't know they were dating? ... Ha! I just googled it, they're married, I really had NO clue, lol.
 
i'm also a little surprised that heath ledger won...i mean, yes, his performance was good and he died and we're all sad about it, but that doesn't mean he was the best actor out of those in his group, or that he should be given the award just because he died and it was his last work. i think philip seymour hoffman, for example, was a thousand times better in his role in the movie "doubt."
 
Very pleased that kate won its well overdue, loved sally hawkins winning i wasnt expecting it at all and i think shes underrated and deserved it, i wanted leo to win best actor, johnny depp looked amazingly hot it was a shame he wasnt nominated, colin farrell with his chewing gum and nervous manerisms made me cringe a lil, loved the thing about catholic guilt though, i was very excited to see drew barrymore loved her since i was a lil girl and she was looking great, overall really enjoyed the show
 
Here are my thoughts:

I'm psyched about Slumdog Millionaire winning so much! It was an incredible movie and deserved every bit of recognition.

Still mad about Neil Patrick Harris not winning. He probably went home and played Ninja Ropes while eating Nathan Fillion's seven-layer bean dip of the gods to cheer himself up.

I haven't seen Mad Men, but I've heard nothing but good things about it and I have to support Connor and Saffron, so I'm glad it won! I really need to start watching it.

Anna Paquin is a solid actress and I love True Blood, but I don't really think she deserved the globe. And for those of you who are saying "Hey, Buffy is so much better than True Blood...how come they never won anything?!", if Buffy had been on HBO, had a different name, and people were as accepting of fantasy/sci fi shows back then as they are now, I think the entire cast and writing staff would be swimming in Emmys and Golden Globes.

HEATH WON! YAY! I teared up a little bit when everyone gave him a standing ovation and Chris Nolan accepted his award. And to you naysayers who are saying he only won because he died, there are plenty of other actors who were nominated for awards posthumously and didn't win. James Dean, anyone?

It's about time Kate Winslet won something...it's long overdue! I'm so happy for her!

Overall, I'm pretty happy with the winners.
 
HEATH WON! YAY! I teared up a little bit when everyone gave him a standing ovation and Chris Nolan accepted his award. And to you naysayers who are saying he only won because he died, there are plenty of other actors who were nominated for awards posthumously and didn't win. James Dean, anyone?

See that last comment I disagree with.
Arguably we live in a far more media/audience conscious world than back then.
If he deserved it or not, there has been a HUGE public outcry for Heath to win and if he didn't, the people who care about the money we put in might be worried about a knock on effect.
 
See that last comment I disagree with.
Arguably we live in a far more media/audience conscious world than back then.
If he deserved it or not, there has been a HUGE public outcry for Heath to win and if he didn't, the people who care about the money we put in might be worried about a knock on effect.

That is a good point, but even if he didn't deserve it quite as much as the other nominees, his performance had to have been pretty special to receive such a strong reaction from the public. If Tom Cruise had died before the Golden Globes and there had been a huge outcry for his victory, do you really think he would have won for his bit part in Tropic Thunder?
 
Mad Men beat Dexter? Blasphemy I say. 😉

I must admit that I've barely seen any of the mentioned shows/movies. I've been busy watching Angel and Buffy!
 
That is a good point, but even if he didn't deserve it quite as much as the other nominees, his performance had to have been pretty special to receive such a strong reaction from the public. If Tom Cruise had died before the Golden Globes and there had been a huge outcry for his victory, do you really think he would have won for his bit part in Tropic Thunder?

Yes because, and you will not hear me say this often, Tom Cruises performance in Tropic Thunder was fracking amazing.

Did he deserve the award for his portrayal?
I don't know, I have arguments for and against.
Would he have been nominated had he lived?
Well The Dark Knights lack of other real nominations, even though it was a great film, suggests probably not.

The fact is we live in an age when a Politician is voted into office and that is largely based on his media friendly profile and not his credibility.

If the public makes a loud enough noise, the people will listen - lest we forget, Hollywood is simply a business and no business ignores the wants of the people who keep them afloat.
 
Yes because, and you will not hear me say this often, Tom Cruises performance in Tropic Thunder was fracking amazing.

Did he deserve the award for his portrayal?
I don't know, I have arguments for and against.
Would he have been nominated had he lived?
Well The Dark Knights lack of other real nominations, even though it was a great film, suggests probably not.

The fact is we live in an age when a Politician is voted into office and that is largely based on his media friendly profile and not his credibility.

If the public makes a loud enough noise, the people will listen - lest we forget, Hollywood is simply a business and no business ignores the wants of the people who keep them afloat.

Tom Cruise was very funny in Tropic Thunder, but it doesn't seem right to compare him to the other supporting actors. They put in months of hard work. Tom put on a fat suit, swore a lot, and danced around Matthew McConaughey for 5 minutes.

I do agree with most of what you're saying, minus the blatant jab at Obama. But still, even though Hollywood cares much more about making money than creating works of art, it doesn't change the fact that Heath Ledger's performance was made iconic not because he died before the world was able to see it, but because of his acting. And I do think that, had he lived, he would have at least gotten a nomination.
 
Tom Cruise was very funny in Tropic Thunder, but it doesn't seem right to compare him to the other supporting actors. They put in months of hard work. Tom put on a fat suit, swore a lot, and danced around Matthew McConaughey for 5 minutes.
Judy Dench, pursed her lips put on a wig and big dress and simply stared at Gwyneth Paltrow for 9 minutes and won an Oscar - whats the difference?
What Tom Cruise did (and I cannot believe I am defending this man) was totally emerse himself into a character that took audience by surprise. I know alot of people didn't realise who it was for quite a while - which had little to do with a 'fat suit' and more to do with the fact he was unrecognisable thanks to acting. People forget that Tom Cruise is actually a pretty decent actor when he is at his best because of his lunatic lifestyle choice.
He was support in the film and as this was for Best Supporting Actor, he fits.
Lest we also forget, the only reason Tom Cruise is in this discussion is because you brought him in, you compared him initially.


I do agree with most of what you're saying, minus the blatant jab at Obama.

Don't make assumptions🙂
That was a generalised attack at more than Obama. The Media Savvy Politician has been around for quite a while.
The biggest recent one in UK history was Tony Blair, and his counter part, David Cameron (I am a Conservative by the way) is also up there in the media profile, lacking the experience, and he is potentially the next Prime Minister.



But still, even though Hollywood cares much more about making money than creating works of art, it doesn't change the fact that Heath Ledger's performance was made iconic not because he died before the world was able to see it, but because of his acting. And I do think that, had he lived, he would have at least gotten a nomination.

You cannot sit there and argue that, just like I cannot argue against it because we have no way to test that opinion.
I personally believe that his performance, though engaging, was not the best of the year and does in no way make his role iconic.

It is rare that films like The Dark Knight (comic book superhero) get nominations in the big ones, (Iron Man was, in my opinion the best film of the year and RDjr's performance was the best of the year and not a single nomination - something many critics were saying on the end of year discussion on BBC2 Newsnight Movie Special) yet this one did - because interestingly the public have demanded it.
 
I wish I could have posted here sooner but my internet went down a week ago and I didn't get back to school until just now! And because of the no internet I didn't realize the globes were last night so I didn't watch them. But...

I'm glad Ledger won, I only watched The Dark Knight a few days ago and I don't think I've seen him in anything else, but it was well-deserved for sure.

YAY FOR WALL-E!! I hadn't seen the other animated films, but Wall-E was so amazing so I'm thrilled.

I also thought that "Down to Earth" from WALL-E should have won, because it's a great song! Haha.

I was surprised that Slumdog Millionaire won so many awards.I haven't seen it, but that was a conscious decision--the previews didn't impress me at all, so I didn't think it would be an impressive movie, but apparently it is! I'll have to see it.

As for the Cecil B. DeMille award, I wasn't alrgely aware of any of Steven Spielberg movies recently, so I was a bit surprised at that, but he's a good director, so good for him! That's an accomplishment.

I was disappointed that Tony Shaloub didn't win for COmedy series, because he does such a good job at Monk. And I officially need to watch 30 Rock because it ALWAYS wins for comedy.
 
Back
Top Bottom