Afghanistan Has Legalized Rape

Revolver

Sir Douche
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
1,874
Location
Cedar Falls, Iowa
Critics assail Afghan law that 'legalizes rape'

KABUL (AP) - A new Afghan law makes it legal for men to rape their wives, human rights groups and some Afghan lawmakers said Thursday, accusing President Hamid Karzai of signing the legislation to bolster his re-election prospects.
Critics worry the legislation undermines hard-won rights for women enacted after the fall of the Taliban's strict Islamist regime.

The law"”which some lawmakers say was never debated in parliament"”is intended to regulate family life inside Afghanistan's Shiite community, which makes up about 20 percent of this country of 30 million people. The law does not affect Afghan Sunnis.

One of the most controversial articles stipulates the wife "is bound to preen for her husband as and when he desires."

"As long as the husband is not traveling, he has the right to have sexual intercourse with his wife every fourth night," Article 132 of the law says. "Unless the wife is ill or has any kind of illness that intercourse could aggravate, the wife is bound to give a positive response to the sexual desires of her husband."

One provision also appears to protect the woman's right to sex inside marriage saying the "man should not avoid having sexual relations with his wife longer than once every four months."

The law's critics say Karzai signed the legislation in the past month only for political gains several months before the country's presidential election.

The United Nations Development Fund for Women, or UNIFEM, said the law "legalizes the rape of a wife by her husband."

"The law violates women's rights and human rights in numerous ways," a UNIFEM statement said.

The strongest criticism came from Canada, a country that has lost 116 soldiers fighting the Taliban and spent up to $8 billion to support the Karzai government.

"The concept that women are full human beings with human rights is very, very central to the reason the international community is engaged in this country," Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said this week in London, where he's attending the G-20 summit.

Canada's Defense Minister Peter MacKay said he will use this week's NATO summit to put "direct" pressure on his Afghan counterparts to abandon the legislation.

The issue of women's rights is a continuous source of tension between the country's conservative establishment and more liberal members of society. The Taliban government that ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001 banned women from appearing in public without a body-covering burqa and a male escort from her family.

Much has improved since then. Millions of girls now attend school and many women own businesses. Of 351 parliamentarians, 89 are women.

But in this staunchly conservative country, critics fear those gains could easily be reversed.

Fawzia Kufi, a lawmaker who opposed the legislation, said several of its articles undermine constitutional and human rights of women as equals and take the country backward.

"All the efforts that were made in the last seven years to enhance women's rights will be undermined," Kufi said.

Karzai has not commented on the law. A spokesman, Waheed Omar, said the president is "aware of the discussion surrounding the law, and is looking into the matter."

Brad Adams, the Asia director for the New York-based Human Rights Watch, said the law is a "dramatic setback for women's rights."

"It directly contradicts the freedoms enshrined in the Afghan constitution and the international conventions that Afghanistan has signed up to that guarantee the rights of women," Adams said.

Safia Sidiqi, a lawmaker from Nangarhar province who condemned the legislation, said she cannot remember parliament debating or even voting on the law and she does not know how it came to be signed by Karzai. She called for the law to be recalled to parliament for debate.

"It is impossible in a two-month session for parliament to pass a law more than 200 pages long," she said of the 263-page law.

Sayed Hossain Alemi Balkhi, a Shiite lawmaker involved in drafting it, defended the legislation saying it gives more rights to women than even Britain or the United States does. He said the law makes women safer and ensures the husband is obliged to provide for her.

As Karzai seeks re-election later this year, he is courting voters in the Shiite community, Kufi said. Women voters are presumed to vote as their husbands do.

"Women's basic freedoms are being sacrificed for the political and electoral gain of a few parliamentarians," Human Rights Watch's Adams said.
 
"preening"? Are you kidding me? What are women, BIRDS?? Who have too...too... show off...and please their husbands? Those pig-headed, asshole, controlling, sexist, jerkoffs that claim to be called "men"?

This article truly makes me ill, seriously. I am so disappointed in humanity right now. I don't even know what to say, I'm so livid. It wasn't even that long ago (Oct 2006) that marital rape was outlawed in India (thank god) but can't Afganistan take the hint?

Guess what folks! This is the 20th century! Women have rights! As in, you know, to their bodies? What a concept! Men are not the lords of women.

I am seriously so pissed right now. Think of all those poor women...
 
R
Revolver
I agree with your outrage but it's actually the 21st century!
G
Giants Rule 04
I agree 100%.
L
luckystar
agreed
It wasn't even that long ago (Oct 2006) that marital rape was outlawed in India (thank god) but can't Afganistan take the hint?
The outlawing of marital rape is still pretty recent (even though long overdue, of course!) progress even in Western countries - even over here in Germany, we finally got the passage "outside of marriage" dropped from the definition of rape in the penal code only as recently as in the 1990s.

It really sucks to have new laws getting passed anywhere on this planet today to make wives the de facto property of their husbands, when in other places finally the right to decide about your own sexuality has started making progress.

Ah well. Just add another item on the list why I think marriage is an outdated institution.
 
Mazikeen
Mazikeen
I totally agree on that last statement.
Are they KIDDING?! A womans body should not belong to anybody but herself!

Also, haven't these people heard of rape being less sexual and more violent? It's about a complete loss of control!!! I'm so pissed right now! Some countries just don't care about women at all, do they???
 
C
charmingslayer
[No message]
Hopefully more than just Canada will put pressure on Karzai. I think NATO has over 50,000 troops in the country so they should have some say. 😛
 
The outlawing of marital rape is still pretty recent (even though long overdue, of course!) progress even in Western countries - even over here in Germany, we finally got the passage "outside of marriage" dropped from the definition of rape in the penal code only as recently as in the 1990s.

It really sucks to have new laws getting passed anywhere on this planet today to make wives the de facto property of their husbands, when in other places finally the right to decide about your own sexuality has started making progress.

Ah well. Just add another item on the list why I think marriage is an outdated institution.

Yeah, it was only made definitively illegal in Scotland in 1989. I can almost understand an archaic piece of law remaining in force for that long - but for new law to be made allowing it? That's disgusting. Human rights should not be used as bargaining chips in politics...
 
Revolver said:
The issue of women's rights is a continuous source of tension between the country's conservative establishment and more liberal members of society. The Taliban government that ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001 banned women from appearing in public without a body-covering burqa and a male escort from her family.

It's sickening. You see it even here, families, and the wife has to wear the full burqa, AND walk BEHIND her husband and family. It makes me mad, but this is their religion, and they choose to follow it, they see nothing wrong with it. Something has to change.
 
It's sickening. You see it even here, families, and the wife has to wear the full burqa, AND walk BEHIND her husband and family. It makes me mad, but this is their religion, and they choose to follow it, they see nothing wrong with it. Something has to change.
Actually, it's not their religion. The Koran (the Muslim holy book) says nothing about women having to even wear a burqa, and it certainly doesn't condone a husband's control over his wife or rape. The laws the Taliban has set against women are so far off from their religious beliefs that it's difficult to even refer to them as radical interpretations of the text.

With that said, this article is just...I can't even find the right words to describe how horrified I am with it. How can they even consider violating basic human rights like that with a clean conscience?
 
Actually, it's not their religion. The Koran (the Muslim holy book) says nothing about women having to even wear a burqa, and it certainly doesn't condone a husband's control over his wife or rape. The laws the Taliban has set against women are so far off from their religious beliefs that it's difficult to even refer to them as radical interpretations of the text.


That make it even more disgusting. I mean, they have completely turned the Koran inside out so that they can justify anything on 'Yeah, it's in the Koran, somewhere..'.

They are not only violating their women, but also that which they claim is holy to them. In fact, what is holy to them is nothing more than their penis.
 
C
ckg927
ANY religion can twist and pervert their beliefs to suit their needs. It's not just Islam that is guilty of it.
I'm pretty sure the 33 million people who weren't involved in the passing of this legislation have a point.

Yeah, but they have to follow it. So it really doesn't matter whether or not they passed it. And come on...how many of those men are really going to ignore it. It's sick. Sick sick people. There's no point to that area being on earth.
 
Yeah, but they have to follow it. So it really doesn't matter whether or not they passed it. And come on...how many of those men are really going to ignore it. It's sick. Sick sick people. There's no point to that area being on earth.

I repeat, it was legal for a husband to rape their wife in Scotland until 1989. We did ok. Judging the many by the actions of the few is neither fair, nor valid. It is sheer ignorance.
 
I repeat, it was legal for a husband to rape their wife in Scotland until 1989. We did ok. Judging the many by the actions of the few is neither fair, nor valid. It is sheer ignorance.

First of all I think that's disgusting and just because Scotland did ok doesn't make it right. How you even know? Obviously there wouldn't be any complaints of husbands raping wives because it was legal! And secondly this is Afghanistan we are talking about, not Scotland. These people are messed to begin with, after all those years with the Taliban and all that crap. The women can't do ANYTHING. It's BS.
 
It's just sick. This is not a man's right or anything. If he wants sex, he buy a doll or something. Rape is so much more than just forcing yourself on someone physically. You're damaging a person mentally as well, and can really screw up a human. Why legalize that????
 
H
Harm
[No message]
Back
Top Bottom