ladydorotea
Scooby
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2009
- Messages
- 722
[MENTION=6758]white avenger[/MENTION]
Regardless of the demon's in question 'code of ethics' , he had no reason to bestow a soul with a happiness clause - he was asked to 'make me as I was' so he either treated it as a straightforward request or as a twisted monkey-paw-style riddle that can be turned upon the subject. We as audience were left with ambiguity and I have no interest to debate this particular point here. By the way, it might very well be that inserting a magical clause actually makes the spell 'more difficult' to perform, because it has to be an active one - continuously monitoring the subject, whereas just slapping a soul on someone with no strings attached is a one time deed.
Btw, Angel's curse was likely effectively preventing him from trying to get a soul permanently - because in order to get it 'in' it has to be 'out' in the ether -and available. Removing the happiness clause without removing the soul first was likely an even more complicated spell than the curse itself. So, effectively Angel would have had to risk getting soulless then relying on the demon to actually keep its word to Angel -- to Angelus, who would have likely be very tough guy to subdue and force the soul back into. Heck, the logistics are a mess here. One need to travel to Africa with a steel cage and a shaman, fight for the soul, then make sure that the demon would keep its word and not renege -- and what % of loosing the soul forever would be worth it ? 30% ? 50% ? Would Angel risk this -- for the sake of his own happiness? Does refusing the risk makes him a coward? The Fang Gang was able to convince him to go on with it when the stakes were preventing the Apocalypses - to get rid of the Beast.
Regardless of the demon's in question 'code of ethics' , he had no reason to bestow a soul with a happiness clause - he was asked to 'make me as I was' so he either treated it as a straightforward request or as a twisted monkey-paw-style riddle that can be turned upon the subject. We as audience were left with ambiguity and I have no interest to debate this particular point here. By the way, it might very well be that inserting a magical clause actually makes the spell 'more difficult' to perform, because it has to be an active one - continuously monitoring the subject, whereas just slapping a soul on someone with no strings attached is a one time deed.
Btw, Angel's curse was likely effectively preventing him from trying to get a soul permanently - because in order to get it 'in' it has to be 'out' in the ether -and available. Removing the happiness clause without removing the soul first was likely an even more complicated spell than the curse itself. So, effectively Angel would have had to risk getting soulless then relying on the demon to actually keep its word to Angel -- to Angelus, who would have likely be very tough guy to subdue and force the soul back into. Heck, the logistics are a mess here. One need to travel to Africa with a steel cage and a shaman, fight for the soul, then make sure that the demon would keep its word and not renege -- and what % of loosing the soul forever would be worth it ? 30% ? 50% ? Would Angel risk this -- for the sake of his own happiness? Does refusing the risk makes him a coward? The Fang Gang was able to convince him to go on with it when the stakes were preventing the Apocalypses - to get rid of the Beast.