Bangel Post NFA?

Definitely agree with this though! You guys are making it hard to not change my mind about my being okay with no more Bangel lol. The more I read about what it could have been, the more I'm disappointed we didn't get it, and wish we could have it now. But I guess for it to work, it would have meant someone other than Joss writing it so.

Yes! Its working! Join the post NFA Bangel cause, its a good cause, there are cookies... or at least cookie dough? LOL.

I have to say I have more faith in Joss than some of you guys do. I think he will shift is attention back to Bangel at some point - although he might just do so to eviscerate it. He won't let Buffy live happily ever after and right now it seems the Spuffy story is looking a bit flowery. Something has to give. I know they make more money off of two titles but are they really making that much money? They don't even market them very well.

Just look at how popular Delena and Captain Swan are compared to Stelena and Swan Thief.

I don't know who any of these people are lol. Is Delena Vampire Diaries? Is this a good show? I heard it sucks. -no pun intended.-
 
IMO a post-Shanshu Angel story or a Bangel post show story or both was absolutely worth exploring. But it needs someone with talent who respects the characters as what they developed into which is not Whedon (see S8) because he doesn't get it. Too blinded by whatever nonsense story he wants to tell.

I heard that Joss was not super involved in Season 8, and didn't he say something somewhere about how it turned into something akin to fanfiction?
 
Yes! Its working! Join the post NFA Bangel cause, its a good cause, there are cookies... or at least cookie dough? LOL.

I LOVE COOKIES, I am considering it 🙂

I have to say I have more faith in Joss than some of you guys do. I think he will shift is attention back to Bangel at some point - although he might just do so to eviscerate it. He won't let Buffy live happily ever after and right now it seems the Spuffy story is looking a bit flowery. Something has to give. I know they make more money off of two titles but are they really making that much money? They don't even market them very well.

Well there's the 2 titles and sure they don't make much more money that way, but they're definitely making more than if it became one title and Spuffy was dropped, in my opinion. But I'd love to be proven wrong 🙂

I don't know who any of these people are lol. Is Delena Vampire Diaries? Is this a good show? I heard it sucks. -no pun intended.-
 

Yes, Delena is from Vampire Diaries. I've only seen 1 season of it so I can't say if it's good. I stopped watching because I didn't really care much for the characters.

Captain Swan is from Once Upon A Time and Jane Espenson happens to be a writer/producer on that show. And guess what? She's also a Captain Swan shipper lol
 
Well there's the 2 titles and sure they don't make much more money that way, but they're definitely making more than if it became one title and Spuffy was dropped, in my opinion. But I'd love to be proven wrong 🙂
I don't get why they are even still being made. If the trend continues, by next issue S11 alone will have lost 1/3 of it's buyers. Which is an awful lot. They started with something like 14.855 and are now down to 10.195, losing a few hundred every issue. Apparently this Spuffy love fest doesn't sell all that well. Which reminds me, yet again, of how little Spuffy's there are. At least those willing to buy (because you can get them free) the comics in order to ensure the love fest continues.

And of course with so little buyers, the large part of fandom (and casual viewers) remains oblivious to what happens there. But I'm supposed to accept them as canon because a few shippers and Spike fans do? Nah, I'll go with the millions of oblivious people and be just as oblivious.
 
Back to the post NFA BANGEL stuff, I have often wondered this. When Buffy and Angel were in a relationship, he was certainly more of a follower* and she called the shots. He has since found his voice, his self confidence, he manned up and told Buffy when she was wrong in Sanctuary and now has now had years of being a leader and calling the shots. Would Buffy even want to be in a relationship with a guy who challenged her? Or would she be more comfortable with someone who lets her get her way, call the shots... someone who is more of a sidekick. (Yeah - I'm talking about Spike, in case you didn't get it) 🙂

*I want to point out that I do think their dynamic did change somewhat in Season 3, where Angel felt to me like he had more equal footing post Amends, he felt more like a partner. I remember one scene in particular that stuck me on subsequent re-watches. During Consequences, Buffy is in the library and she gives her marching orders to the scoobies. She says:

BUFFY
We should split up. I'll take the
docks - chances are, she's there.
Giles - you go to her place. Will -
you and Xander check her haunts.
(firmly)
Take weapons.

And she doesn't issue an order to Angel. Instead he himself throws in "I'll try the airport." See also the partnership between them as they work together in Bad Girls where they conduct strategy together. So I do feel like the dynamic was changing. But I'm interested in this idea that Angel post BTVS would not be afraid to disagree with Buffy.
 
Would Buffy even want to be in a relationship with a guy who challenged her? Or would she be more comfortable with someone who lets her get her way, call the shots... someone who is more of a sidekick. (Yeah - I'm talking about Spike, in case you didn't get it) 🙂
That's one reason why I have doubts about any possible B/A. The way Buffy was developed post-high school makes it less likely. Buffy was never looking for an equal partner anymore, even if it was subconsciously. And one thing is for certain over the course of the show, even her loved ones don't fare well when they go against her. Which is why Spike is so attractive to her in the way he developed, why she was so invested in him in S7 and why she jumped him in the current comics (it sure had nothing to do with love). She wants an eternal cheerleader, someone who sticks with her no matter what and no matter how she treats them. Basically Buffy's life has enough bad shit happening, she rather have an easy love life. Hence, she seems to prefer an easy partner who lets her wear the pants and who she can treat either great or like crap but no matter what, they don't leave her.

It's one reason why her and Riley didn't work out. He was always looking to be a (equal) partner and Buffy just wouldn't let him. Granted there were several reasons for that, but by S5 there was so much going on in Buffy's life that she simply didn't have the energy for an equal romantic relationship.

Angel would definitely be an equal partner and insist on being treated as such. Their different morals and leadership styles would create problems. When Buffy's ego gets out of hand, Angel would put his foot down. When Angel makes a decision without consulting with her, she'd be pissed and complain about not being treated as an equal partner. Basically Bangel post-NFA would be extremely complicated and hard to pull off. But with a good writer it's totally possible. And if non-professional fanfic writers can create great stories, it makes you wonder why professionals are so lacking in talent.
 
That's one reason why I have doubts about any possible B/A. The way Buffy was developed post-high school makes it less likely. Buffy was never looking for an equal partner anymore, even if it was subconsciously. And one thing is for certain over the course of the show, even her loved ones don't fare well when they go against her. Which is why Spike is so attractive to her in the way he developed, why she was so invested in him in S7 and why she jumped him in the current comics (it sure had nothing to do with love). She wants an eternal cheerleader, someone who sticks with her no matter what and no matter how she treats them. Basically Buffy's life has enough bad shit happening, she rather have an easy love life. Hence, she seems to prefer an easy partner who lets her wear the pants and who she can treat either great or like crap but no matter what, they don't leave her.

It's one reason why her and Riley didn't work out. He was always looking to be a (equal) partner and Buffy just wouldn't let him. Granted there were several reasons for that, but by S5 there was so much going on in Buffy's life that she simply didn't have the energy for an equal romantic relationship.

Angel would definitely be an equal partner and insist on being treated as such. Their different morals and leadership styles would create problems. When Buffy's ego gets out of hand, Angel would put his foot down. When Angel makes a decision without consulting with her, she'd be pissed and complain about not being treated as an equal partner. Basically Bangel post-NFA would be extremely complicated and hard to pull off. But with a good writer it's totally possible. And if non-professional fanfic writers can create great stories, it makes you wonder why professionals are so lacking in talent.

I think all the reasons you just stated, is why their relationship would be so complex and interesting, of course if the writers could pull it off. Funny how writers always get stuck on writing the terrible, toxic, full of sex relationships, but can never seem to write a beautifully complex relationship like Bangel; at least not for long. I feel like what we got of them was good, but it could have been better and it could be even more intense and intriguing post NFA due to all of the changes they have went through.
 
That's one reason why I have doubts about any possible B/A. The way Buffy was developed post-high school makes it less likely.

I think all the reasons you just stated, is why their relationship would be so complex and interesting,

Yeah I think ultimately it comes down to is Buffy so changed that she would no longer be interested in a relationship that challenged her? But you know, what we 'want' isn't always the same as what we 'need' and I think Buffy would benefit from someone who would keep her on her toes.

Also how boring is it to be with a "yes" man?

It's one reason why her and Riley didn't work out. He was always looking to be a (equal) partner and Buffy just wouldn't let him.

It's funny because I really think that Buffy wanted a partnership with Riley especially in Season 4. You saw her talking strategy with him, discussing tactics, joining the initiative, going out and demon hunting with him. I think the problem is Riley couldn't hang and then he would constantly bring up how she was stronger or how she would do things differently (the Slayer v. the Military way) and then by Season 5 he is juicing up and everything went downhill from there. After Riley, she seems to decide she is on her own. Spike is (in her mind) her strongest ally but never an equal.
 
Also how boring is it to be with a "yes" man?
I'd be bored out of my mind. But I'm not Buffy.

It's funny because I really think that Buffy wanted a partnership with Riley especially in Season 4. You saw her talking strategy with him, discussing tactics, joining the initiative, going out and demon hunting with him. I think the problem is Riley couldn't hang and then he would constantly bring up how she was stronger or how she would do things differently (the Slayer v. the Military way) and then by Season 5 he is juicing up and everything went downhill from there. After Riley, she seems to decide she is on her own. Spike is (in her mind) her strongest ally but never an equal.
What you described is 'fighting partner' or 'work partner'. Sure Buffy let Riley be that. But she lets all guys be that to a degree (Angel, Riley, Spike). But she never let Riley be a life partner. She kept secrets about her past even after the slayer reveal, she never leaned on him, she never let herself be vulnerable enough to break down. These are things she allowed herself to be with Angel, even after they broke up. There was a part of her that Riley simply couldn't reach because IMO Buffy wasn't in love with him.
 
What you described is 'fighting partner' or 'work partner'. Sure Buffy let Riley be that. But she lets all guys be that to a degree (Angel, Riley, Spike). But she never let Riley be a life partner. She kept secrets about her past even after the slayer reveal, she never leaned on him, she never let herself be vulnerable enough to break down. These are things she allowed herself to be with Angel, even after they broke up. There was a part of her that Riley simply couldn't reach because IMO Buffy wasn't in love with him.

True, although I think she bosses Spike around in a way she did not do with Riley. I think its a measure of respect that I never saw her have with Spike.

I just finished re-watching intervention and its relevant that Buffy says:

------
BUFFY: I'm starting to feel like ... being the Slayer is turning me into stone.
.....
BUFFY: Just ... think about it. I was never there for Riley, not like I was for Angel. I was terrible to Dawn.
GILES: At a time like this-
BUFFY: No.
GILES: You're bound to feel emotionally numb.
BUFFY: Before that. Riley left because I was shut down. He's gone.
------

She admits that she never let Riley in but I find it annoying that she attributes that to her being too slayer-ish. She "wasn't there" for Riley because she didn't love him. She wanted to and tried but you can't force it and she needs to stop beating herself up about it. But I do wonder if she even has that ability to be vulnerable anymore with anyone. I feel like she was vulnerable with Angel in Forever, she talked with him all night about her fears and her concerns in a way she hadn't confided in very many people. So she was able to be open with him up to Season 5. But then she went and died and God knows what came back...
 
True, although I think she bosses Spike around in a way she did not do with Riley. I think its a measure of respect that I never saw her have with Spike.

I just finished re-watching intervention and its relevant that Buffy says:

------
BUFFY: I'm starting to feel like ... being the Slayer is turning me into stone.
.....
BUFFY: Just ... think about it. I was never there for Riley, not like I was for Angel. I was terrible to Dawn.
GILES: At a time like this-
BUFFY: No.
GILES: You're bound to feel emotionally numb.
BUFFY: Before that. Riley left because I was shut down. He's gone.
------

She admits that she never let Riley in but I find it annoying that she attributes that to her being too slayer-ish. She "wasn't there" for Riley because she didn't love him. She wanted to and tried but you can't force it and she needs to stop beating herself up about it. But I do wonder if she even has that ability to be vulnerable anymore with anyone. I feel like she was vulnerable with Angel in Forever, she talked with him all night about her fears and her concerns in a way she hadn't confided in very many people. So she was able to be open with him up to Season 5. But then she went and died and God knows what came back...

Well s6 buffy was numb and s7 buffy was very cold (which is worst for me than numb) so I agree with this.

That said, I still feel like we got glimpses of that feeling oriented buffy in Chosen, so I'm inclined to think that Angel really does bring that out in her. Whether it's written that way or SMG is the one playing it that way, I'm not sure. But I think the cookie dough speech when compared to how difficult it seems for Buffy to express herself with Spike in Touched, and even after that, shows that Angel really does bring out the real, in touch with her emotions Buffy.
 
She admits that she never let Riley in but I find it annoying that she attributes that to her being too slayer-ish. She "wasn't there" for Riley because she didn't love him. She wanted to and tried but you can't force it and she needs to stop beating herself up about it.
IMO it's all about the theme of 'darkness' and the Spuffy setup. Buffy has to go dark to be with Spike. That's the only way to get Spuffy, she has to either be dragged down to his level or be destroyed as she is. And in keeping with the darkness theme, which has been there since Season 1 but Whedon didn't want to explore (only flirted with in the Angelus arc) until Buffy was old enough to be sodomized and cornholed by Spiky, Buffy had to attribute the failure of her relationship with Riley to her slayerness. To that 'darkness' in her. Of course that's a bunch of BS but Whedon has been pushing Buffy there since S4 and then really got it going in S5.

But I do wonder if she even has that ability to be vulnerable anymore with anyone. I feel like she was vulnerable with Angel in Forever, she talked with him all night about her fears and her concerns in a way she hadn't confided in very many people. So she was able to be open with him up to Season 5. But then she went and died and God knows what came back...
Buffy absolutely has the ability to be vulnerable. She did with Angel plenty of times up to and including EoD/Chosen. She did with Giles from time to time. People always say she did with Spike but I disagree. First off, Spike usually walked in on her being vulnerable. Like when she cries on the steps of her house about her mom or in Touched. S6 is harder to pinpoint but she seems to be telling him things just to get them out (like the Heaven reveal), knowing it won't get back to her friends. He's more a sounding board then her looking to be vulnerable.

I've always understood Buffy better than some viewers in that I'm similar in my 'introverted-ness'. Buffy prefers to work things out herself and in herself. She doesn't like sharing all day about her feelings. You can't push her to open up and the more you push the more she closes up. She doesn't have many people in her life she opens up to or lets herself be vulnerable with. I'm the same way in that regard. It's why I could never be friends with Xander and Willow and why they were totally the wrong friends for Buffy IMO.

The thing about Angel (and Oz btw) is that he lets Buffy just...be. He doesn't pressure her to open up to him one way or the other. He lets her know he's there if she wants him but he doesn't put any expectations on her in terms of when and how to share. It's no coincidence that Buffy was more likeable and easier to understand (for some viewers) during the years that Angel was there. Because he was the 'mirror to the inner Buffy'. Buffy closed herself off more and more to the point where in S7 even some of the most hardcore Buffy fans where at a loss as to what was going on with her/inside her.

The show never gave Buffy an 'Angel replacement', in that a person who has no expectations of her so she feels comfortable enough to open up. They could have made Willow that, post High School. Or if Riley wasn't going to be it, why not Tara (ala S6)?

Everyone else in her life had expectations of her or put pressure on her. Willow and Xander overshared by nature due to their home lives so they expected Buffy to do the same. And when she didn't that often was not pretty (Scoobie friendship is such an awesome messed up catch-22). Buffy just wants to work out her problems and they constantly want her to share. Her mom and Giles also have expectations of her, as daughter and slayer/sort of daughter. So do Riley and Spike with their romantic expectations.

Angel let Buffy just be which allowed her to breathe and in turn be vulnerable and open up. I'm not sure if that would still be the case post-NFA though, largely because Angel is now more his own person. Sure we still had that dynamic in 'Forever' but NFA is 3 years later. If only we had gotten to see the S6/3 meeting after Buffy came back.
 
Mylie
Mylie
Omg yes that damn meeting!!! I want it!!!!
IMO it's all about the theme of 'darkness' and the Spuffy setup. Buffy has to go dark to be with Spike. That's the only way to get Spuffy, she has to either be dragged down to his level or be destroyed as she is. And in keeping with the darkness theme, which has been there since Season 1 but Whedon didn't want to explore (only flirted with in the Angelus arc) until Buffy was old enough to be sodomized and cornholed by Spiky, Buffy had to attribute the failure of her relationship with Riley to her slayerness. To that 'darkness' in her. Of course that's a bunch of BS but Whedon has been pushing Buffy there since S4 and then really got it going in S5.


Buffy absolutely has the ability to be vulnerable. She did with Angel plenty of times up to and including EoD/Chosen. She did with Giles from time to time. People always say she did with Spike but I disagree. First off, Spike usually walked in on her being vulnerable. Like when she cries on the steps of her house about her mom or in Touched. S6 is harder to pinpoint but she seems to be telling him things just to get them out (like the Heaven reveal), knowing it won't get back to her friends. He's more a sounding board then her looking to be vulnerable.

I've always understood Buffy better than some viewers in that I'm similar in my 'introverted-ness'. Buffy prefers to work things out herself and in herself. She doesn't like sharing all day about her feelings. You can't push her to open up and the more you push the more she closes up. She doesn't have many people in her life she opens up to or lets herself be vulnerable with. I'm the same way in that regard. It's why I could never be friends with Xander and Willow and why they were totally the wrong friends for Buffy IMO.

The thing about Angel (and Oz btw) is that he lets Buffy just...be. He doesn't pressure her to open up to him one way or the other. He lets her know he's there if she wants him but he doesn't put any expectations on her in terms of when and how to share. It's no coincidence that Buffy was more likeable and easier to understand (for some viewers) during the years that Angel was there. Because he was the 'mirror to the inner Buffy'. Buffy closed herself off more and more to the point where in S7 even some of the most hardcore Buffy fans where at a loss as to what was going on with her/inside her.

The show never gave Buffy an 'Angel replacement', in that a person who has no expectations of her so she feels comfortable enough to open up. They could have made Willow that, post High School. Or if Riley wasn't going to be it, why not Tara (ala S6)?

Everyone else in her life had expectations of her or put pressure on her. Willow and Xander overshared by nature due to their home lives so they expected Buffy to do the same. And when she didn't that often was not pretty (Scoobie friendship is such an awesome messed up catch-22). Buffy just wants to work out her problems and they constantly want her to share. Her mom and Giles also have expectations of her, as daughter and slayer/sort of daughter. So do Riley and Spike with their romantic expectations.

Angel let Buffy just be which allowed her to breathe and in turn be vulnerable and open up. I'm not sure if that would still be the case post-NFA though, largely because Angel is now more his own person. Sure we still had that dynamic in 'Forever' but NFA is 3 years later. If only we had gotten to see the S6/3 meeting after Buffy came back.

The network cheated us out of seeing the meeting between Buffy and Angel after she was back. It is too bad because Bangels have to imagine what it might have been like and it might not have been what truly happened.
 
True, although I think she bosses Spike around in a way she did not do with Riley. I think its a measure of respect that I never saw her have with Spike.

I just finished re-watching intervention and its relevant that Buffy says:

------
BUFFY: I'm starting to feel like ... being the Slayer is turning me into stone.
.....
BUFFY: Just ... think about it. I was never there for Riley, not like I was for Angel. I was terrible to Dawn.
GILES: At a time like this-
BUFFY: No.
GILES: You're bound to feel emotionally numb.
BUFFY: Before that. Riley left because I was shut down. He's gone.
------

She admits that she never let Riley in but I find it annoying that she attributes that to her being too slayer-ish. She "wasn't there" for Riley because she didn't love him. She wanted to and tried but you can't force it and she needs to stop beating herself up about it. But I do wonder if she even has that ability to be vulnerable anymore with anyone. I feel like she was vulnerable with Angel in Forever, she talked with him all night about her fears and her concerns in a way she hadn't confided in very many people. So she was able to be open with him up to Season 5. But then she went and died and God knows what came back...

Buffy bossing Spike around I don't have a problem with. He was a arch enemy for a long time, and it makes sense that she wouldn't just treat him as one of the good guys straight away. It also adds to Spike's arc that he has to overcome those moments and win the respect of Buffy and to a lesser extent the other Scoobies. Plus those scenes are fun😛
 
GwenRaiden
GwenRaiden
This is the Bangel forum, btw.
LOL. Love how you guys only focused on my last sentence (which I only edited in btw) but no comments on the rest of my long reply.😵
 
LOL. Love how you guys only focused on my last sentence (which I only edited in btw) but no comments on the rest of my long reply.😵

Sorry, I agreed with everything and was just going to like your post and then I saw the last part and !!!!! I cannot think coherently when it comes to this. All my brain can form is : I WANT IT. I NEED IT.
 
LOL. Love how you guys only focused on my last sentence (which I only edited in btw) but no comments on the rest of my long reply.😵

My deepest apologies to not replying to your entire post; I did like it. After I read the part about the un-aired Bangel meeting the rest went out of my head. I can't not stop thinking about what never was.
 
IMO it's all about the theme of 'darkness' and the Spuffy setup. Buffy has to go dark to be with Spike. That's the only way to get Spuffy, she has to either be dragged down to his level or be destroyed as she is. And in keeping with the darkness theme, which has been there since Season 1 but Whedon didn't want to explore (only flirted with in the Angelus arc) until Buffy was old enough to be sodomized and cornholed by Spiky, Buffy had to attribute the failure of her relationship with Riley to her slayerness. To that 'darkness' in her. Of course that's a bunch of BS but Whedon has been pushing Buffy there since S4 and then really got it going in S5.

When your character has to arc so much to make a relationship fit them, I think that should be a clue something is wrong. When Buffy had to become dark and depressed and detached to let Spike screw her into depression, then become cold and distant so he could ....do whatever he did in Season 7, that to me indicates the relationship probably should not have been, it was a forced situation. When Angel had to turn into a smiling dork and Cordy had to turn into some mother hen mother Theresa to make the relationship believable, it means it should not have happened to begin with....

That being said, I liked the Season 5 arc, I liked Buffy exploring her darkness, but I would have liked to see her concur that darkness and she never does instead she just slips further and further into a hole with Season 6 and then in Season 7 she never recovers. She never finds her strength and to me she remains lost.

Angel let Buffy just be which allowed her to breathe and in turn be vulnerable and open up. I'm not sure if that would still be the case post-NFA though, largely because Angel is now more his own person. Sure we still had that dynamic in 'Forever' but NFA is 3 years later. If only we had gotten to see the S6/3 meeting after Buffy came back.

By Season 7 Buffy is basically a cold hearted bitch. She doesn't smile. She is more slayer than woman. She has not found her balance. In EoD/Chosen when Angel comes we get just a small little glimpse of a smile and the old Buffy for a hot flash of a second then she shuts it all down and she is hardened again. I think if they got back together Angel would have to work hard to remind her that she isn't JUST a warrior, she isn't just a fighter, she is also a human, a woman.

Spike tries I think to get through to Buffy to let her guard down in touched. And again, I don't know if I'm biased, I don't know if its SMG's acting, or what but I don't see anywhere in that scene where his words (however sweet they were) got through to her. She still looked cold and distant. He may as well have been a stuffed animal she was cuddling with:
touched.jpg

Sure Spike helped her through this tough time, by being there and giving her a hell of pep talk. But the Buffy that walks back into her house in EoD is the same exact person, cold distant, she seems confident in her plan but not in herself. She still doesn't feel like Buffy. Could Angel have gotten through to her? Or is she just a lost cause doomed to walk around all mopey and depressed.

God who would have thought Buffy would turn into such a brooder. She and Angel would at least have that in common now.
 
My deepest apologies to not replying to your entire post; I did like it. After I read the part about the un-aired Bangel meeting the rest went out of my head. I can't not stop thinking about what never was.
No need to apologize. I was kidding. I just found it funny that everyone zeroed in on that when I added it after I already hit the reply button and edited that post.

When your character has to arc so much to make a relationship fit them, I think that should be a clue something is wrong. When Buffy had to become dark and depressed and detached to let Spike screw her into depression, then become cold and distant so he could ....do whatever he did in Season 7, that to me indicates the relationship probably should not have been, it was a forced situation. When Angel had to turn into a smiling dork and Cordy had to turn into some mother hen mother Theresa to make the relationship believable, it means it should not have happened to begin with....
Oh absolutely. I can't stand when shows do this to get two people together. Either two people work as the characters they are or you get a dishonest story/relationship. This is true of both Spuffy and Cangel. Buffy had to be put through the ringer not because it was part of her journey (since Joss always hands her deus-ex-machinas to exempt her from making the choice post-Becoming), but just so she could be pawned off to Spike. The template of the early Seasons was completely inverted (along with canon and mythology but whatever). Angel had to show every day that he was a good guy and therefore it was ok for him to be with Buffy. Spike didn't have to do that, he was allowed to stay the same and Buffy was dragged down to his level to pull their ship off. She had to be turned inside out and upside down to make the story work. The Scoobies also had to be turned into absolute douchebags. All this just to get her onto Spike's penis. And people insist this show is feminist, pft. Buffy, the strong and admirable yet flawed person had to be turned into a depressive weakling and cold heart-ed megalomaniac with a superiority complex that spend most of her time whining. All for a guy/relationship. Urgh.

That being said, I liked the Season 5 arc, I liked Buffy exploring her darkness, but I would have liked to see her concur that darkness and she never does instead she just slips further and further into a hole with Season 6 and then in Season 7 she never recovers. She never finds her strength and to me she remains lost
My issue is the timing with it. The 'darkness' theme had been there since S1 (hello Master) and really came out in S2 with Angelus. Of course both Buffy the show and character were too young to explore it then. S3 tried to shift it to Faith except Faith's darkness was all about her human issues and nothing to do with some kind of slayer darkness. S4 really was too light and funny and bright for the topic. S5 felt like overkill, nvm what came after. From Dracula (URGH wtf you don't belong in this verse...stupid monks stop reading trash and insert it into this reality, morons), to death wish, to Riley letting himself be suck, to Spike...too much too sudden. As usual I just blame it on the monks.

By Season 7 Buffy is basically a cold hearted bitch. She doesn't smile. She is more slayer than woman. She has not found her balance. In EoD/Chosen when Angel comes we get just a small little glimpse of a smile and the old Buffy for a hot flash of a second then she shuts it all down and she is hardened again. I think if they got back together Angel would have to work hard to remind her that she isn't JUST a warrior, she isn't just a fighter, she is also a human, a woman.

Spike tries I think to get through to Buffy to let her guard down in touched. And again, I don't know if I'm biased, I don't know if its SMG's acting, or what but I don't see anywhere in that scene where his words (however sweet they were) got through to her. She still looked cold and distant. He may as well have been a stuffed animal she was cuddling with:
touched.jpg
There was enough space between them that Dawn could have fit in, just saying.

I don't blame SMG for a) not being allowed to show more range when playing Buffy (she was fine as The First so it's not her acting) b) having become so disconnected from the character she might as well be playing a stranger. After all it took them forever to shoot that 'i love you, no you don't' scene because SMG had no clue as to Buffy's feelings anymore.

Or is she just a lost cause doomed to walk around all mopey and depressed.
If that was what Whedon, Marti & Co. were trying for then they succeeded. If not then they are terrible at what they do. And I don't think that was supposed to be Buffy in S7. But intention and execution are two different things.

God who would have thought Buffy would turn into such a brooder. She and Angel would at least have that in common now.
Buffy isn't a brooder. Never will be. To be one you have to be self-aware of your mistakes and self-reflective of your life and choices, none of which applies to Buffy.
 
Back
Top Bottom