Buffy gets a reboot! It's official.

And the thing is it opens Buffy up to a whole new demographic. I mean 7, 8 or 9 year olds (to whom this is geared) really shouldn't be watching the TV show or reading the comic.

This is for older fans. Specifically older fans with kids or nieces or nephews whom them want to indoctrinate in the mythology. I know @Nix wanted to get her daughter involved in Buffy but for a long time wondered if she was too young, this would be a perfect way to bridge the gap.

Plus, the idea of Buffy being in this age- with text messaging, etc, could really spin the thing differently.

I do think this book is great for younger kids, and we should get them indoctrinated into loving Buffy at a young age.

There are things on the early seasons that a younger child perhaps shouldn't see, or that could be seen differently from today's perspective. Making the Watcher female seems right - seeing a middle aged man getting close to a 12 year old girl just looks suspect nowadays, sadly. It would also appear 'Willow' is a character of colour, which I like. Also seems Xander has been replaced by Oz, or an amalgam of the two, which seems a bit odd but I'm happy to go with it.
 
I'm not against this either and it could get a new generation into Buffy. Its just different to the show.
 
Also seems Xander has been replaced by Oz, or an amalgam of the two, which seems a bit odd but I'm happy to go with it.
Well, Xander really wasn't 'different' this is about accepting people's differences, etc. What the show was initially about and then lampooned when they made the trio the villains, but I digress... I think having this "xander" be an other fits the narrative well. Especially if the vampires turn out to be the cool kids and jocks & especially if they are the adults
 
This might be good material for young learners of English as a second language. I will mention it to my teacher friends.
 
this just looks dumb. why are they trying to attract younger readers- i mean, 12yr olds?? the older teen like how buffy started should be the target audience to really kick up a revival, not this childish crap. buffy was always centered on young adult themes, not children, sobthat it was relatable. if im going to introduce a child to buffy, id want them to know the actual characters and the actual story, i cant wrap my head around this direction.
 
This is just a licensed product, not a canon reboot. I'm kind of two minds on this. On the one hand it might get a new generation of fans interested in Buffy. On the other hand, if they then "graduate" to watching the actual series, it won't be the Buffy they know.

I don't imagine it will make much more difference than the High School Years mini-graphic novels did, though.
 
The premise of this makes no sense. How the hell - yes, HELL - is a 12 year old Buffy supposed to fight adult vampires anyway?😕

Or is she only going to kill ones in her own age-group....?
Not to jump to the defence of this, since as I've said it looks rubbish, but a 12 year old can be as magically enhanced by slayer strength and speed as a 15 year old or 30 year old.
 
Wait..... kids can't read the word Hell these days!? 😵

I may be wrong, but I believe 'Hell' is considered much more of a cuss work in America than it is over here. Even Mayor Wilkins called it H E double hockey sticks... 😉

As for making fighting Vampires suitable for 10-12 year olds......Well maybe instead of draining their victims blood & killing them the Vamps just give you a nasty hickey....
But it's okay kids, Buffy's here & she's going to give those Vamps a long timeout on the naughty step.....!
 
I may be wrong, but I believe 'Hell' is considered much more of a cuss work in America than it is over here. Even Mayor Wilkins called it H E double hockey sticks... 😉
Yeah it seems to be.

I half expect this book to have a sticker somewhere saying it's endorsed by some nutty parental censorship organisation.
 
Thought Buffy's watcher before Giles was Merrick? Wish they wouldn't go off canon. 🙁 Heckmouth though........
 
This is just a licensed product, not a canon reboot. I'm kind of two minds on this. On the one hand it might get a new generation of fans interested in Buffy. On the other hand, if they then "graduate" to watching the actual series, it won't be the Buffy they know.

I don't imagine it will make much more difference than the High School Years mini-graphic novels did, though.

Yes this doesn't reboot canon, Joss' name isn't near it from anything I've seen. Personally I think it looks pretty terrible and I think the target audience would either be still too young to watch the show or would find the show is too disjointed from what they have come from to enjoy it as they should.

The High School Years at least has Joss' involvement and they were made as canon compliant additions to slot in. Sure they didn't have impact because they weren't going to disrupt canon with them, but they were passable extra stories which supported main themes of the season and almost presented as introductory teasers for the show. This middle school thing is just not compliant to canon and seems pretty random to me. I can't imagine even getting the first of these.
 
This is for older fans. Specifically older fans with kids or nieces or nephews whom them want to indoctrinate in the mythology.

If I want to get my nephew into Buffy, I'll wait until he's older and let him watch the real thing (though only Seasons 1-3). He already knows the names of some of the characters via the Sims 3.

This comic looks crap. Ignoring the art and how irritating the "Buffy" character is, my first main issue with it is that it shows Buffy not wanting to wear a bike helmet. Children should be taught how to keep themselves safe, which includes wearing a helmet whilst bike riding, not have the main character act like it's the worse thing in the world just because she doesn't want "helmet hair". What's next, Buffy doesn't want to look both ways crossing the street because it gives the wind a longer time to blow her hair about? My other issue with it is how it's basically ticking boxes in order to be PC.

Giles is now a woman because how dare he remain male. Willow is now black because you can't have too many white characters. Xander is now a werewolf wearing flip flops with a camera that makes him look like a junior "reporter" because you've got to have that "wacky" sidekick. Though they may have different names, these are this comic's version of Giles, Willow and Xander. (And before anyone jumps on me, there is nothing wrong with having a black character in a story. However, when a beloved character's skin colour is only changed just so that a box can be ticked, then it becomes annoying. I'd be saying the same thing if they turned James Bond into a woman because that would be box ticking as well. Therefore when I say it's annoying that they turned Willow black, it's not about her being black, but about the fact that it's box ticking. It wouldn't surprise me if the Xander character ends up in a wheelchair because then they can tick another box there as well or maybe he too will decide that he'd prefer to be female so they can add another tick to the gender box and get rid of any male character all together. Gender, Race, Disability, 3 boxes ticked with the Scooby gang alone, add in religion and yet anther box is ticked.

Buffy may have it's light-hearted moments, but it is not a light-hearted show. The main character is stuck with a destiny which means that she could die any day and there is nothing she can do about it. The show villains were good because they posed an actual threat. Buffy is not a kids show and should not be turned into such. "Heckmouth" really shows how much of a load of bollocks this comic really is. They can't even be honest about the whole premise that Buffy's town is built on top of a HELLmouth.

If you're going to get younger relatives into Buffy, do it properly with the real thing, don't pass them off with this crap.
 
Especially if the vampires turn out to be the cool kids and jocks & especially if they are the adults

Mona the Vampire did a decent job with that kind of premise where the "monsters" weren't actually monsters but ordinary people and it was Mona's imagination.


Making the Watcher female seems right - seeing a middle aged man getting close to a 12 year old girl just looks suspect nowadays, sadly.

Yep because only men pose a danger to children apparently. A stereotype that contributes to why childcare is a predominantly female profession.
 
Seriously, why can't they just make the damn animated series?! If they want to reboot it and kind of start from the beginning and appeal to younger demographic, why not just make the animated series that was intended to be for kids and adults alike?! Not to mention, this "reboot" changes all of the characters?... this is a joke right?
 
Yep because only men pose a danger to children apparently. A stereotype that contributes to why childcare is a predominantly female profession.
Especially since you can read up on all the misconduct of female teachers which is running rampant. But we don't talk about that in media because it would tarnish all that 'feminism' stuff. Can't have anything interfere with that 'all men are evil' stuff.
 
Back
Top Bottom