Buffy the Vampire Slayer - 1950s Super Panavision 70

NileQT87

Billowy Coat, King of Pain
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
719
Age
39
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
So, I recently stumbled upon a series of A.I. videos in the style of '50s Panavision trailers, and low and behold, two creators of them have done this to Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Some of these would be actually awesome and more interesting to make into period piece reboots than updating and recasting everything always into an achingly tedious modern setting with all the wrong instincts on how to modernize it. Boom! showed quite clearly how that can go terribly wrong fast. Also, focus on writers' pet favorites that don't always align with who the main characters actually are.

Two versions of it (one looking like the original cast and the other an imaginary '50s-looking cast):

I'd actually watch a '50s Buffy the Vampire Slayer. I think it would actually work really well, as the character archetypes would be quite easy to make into their retro counterparts (Scooby Doo is from the '60s-'70s, after all, and Anne Rice--the Fanged Four owe their biggest debt to her--first published in 1976--and these trailers have shades of Nancy Drew, which is obviously far older than those). I'd even love to see treatments of the same basic story/characters dropped into other eras and adapted accordingly.

The original '90s setting (both 1992 and 1997) already feels a bit distant already. The high school years as is couldn't be made believably in a post-Columbine setting at all. It's Zero Tolerance policy violations everywhere with a whole arsenal of medieval weaponry in the school library. Two episodes were already held back for months because one depicted what seemed to be a school shooter that was really a suicide attempt which Buffy talked down scheduled to air a week after Columbine and the other had the students rising up to fight the Mayor and blowing up the school! The fact that there aren't any cell phones ("If the apocalypse comes, beep me.") changes the way characters act when they're in danger and the believability that the vampire slaying and monster hunting isn't being filmed and photographed all over social media. Hard to have "Sunnydale Syndrome" where the town seems oblivious to living on a Hellmouth in the age of social media.

Or better yet, a historical Tales of the Slayer that doesn't need to trample on the '90s-'00s canon (all 254 episodes of Buffy and Angel) at all and gets around the nasty idea of recasting and rebooting the whole thing by throwing the original away. So much room for period pieces baked in to the mythology already.

The Buffyverse is explicitly multiversal, so this actually might not be a terrible way to reboot it. Rather than trying to cater to a young, hip modern audience, aim for something a bit more high-concept like this alternate universe where the story is adapted to another time period. And the period drama of it all could actually be the selling point for people who would otherwise never watch a YA show. We've seen the shows do little period pieces with all the flashbacks, so imagine the main drama adapted to the time period it's set in.
 
Last edited:
The issue seems to be that it is "Buffy" that is the most valuable part of the franchise. So, it looks like Di$ney is most interested in Buffy herself, not AUs or other time periods. Slayers explored an AU and was cancelled after one season, despite being successful from everything I can tell. I would rather AUs and period pieces than a reboot, but a reboot seems the most likely thing to happen.
 
This is the one way you could do both a total recast using the character names the studio actually cares about while also sneakily being an alternate universe with a high-concept idea that doesn't trample on the original, as it still exists. It's also a way to send it back to the start with the core show elements (Sunnydale included!), characters back from the dead and the main character still in the target demographic--not to mention her love interests (given the actors are 47, 55 and 62 now). Also without the baggage of 254 episodes that the studio is probably not loving when trying to find a new audience that wasn't born when they aired.

Imagine this alternate Buffy meeting up with Buffy as played by SMG in her 40s, perhaps having retired along with a Shanshu'd Angel, to witness an alternate version of herself who had a happy ending at a time when hers maybe seems bleak. But her story is ultimately not going to be the same exact one, even if it begins with all the same recognizable core elements.

Sort of like The Winchesters actually being an alternate universe, but that died because of Nexstar canceling nearly everything left from the old CW to chase cheap reality shows and Canadian imports for the elderly demographic that apparently was watching all those YA dramas (though Supernatural's increasingly middle-aged leads weren't exactly YA material anymore!). The Winchesters also had the problem of John and Mary (not to mention Samuel Campbell--who got a bit of an upgrade and certainly more hair from Mitch Pileggi to Tom Welling) not being the most sympathetic characters to make a '70s alternate universe origin story out of, even if Dean and Baby showed up at the end only to be taken back to Heaven by Jack. Still, it had the main universe interacting with alternate versions of established characters.

Slayers failed because it didn't have the leads and very few of the actors were playing their original roles as they were. Some of the characters were in name only.

Boom! likewise changed so much of the mythology, world building and characters to the point where the only things recognizable were the drawings (sometimes). And of course, they relied way too much on the audience to fill in the gaps on all the relationships they didn't bother to establish and focused on all the wrong characters while trying desperately to excise anything from the story that could possibly offend someone. Even the popular school bullies had to be sickeningly nice and supporting all the right causes in the Boom! version where redemption for even characters like the original Cordy can't exist (not to mention so much of what Xander said), much less the characters with far more baggage. Kind of defeats the point of even a character like Cordy coming onto Angel's show and thinking she had something to atone for just like Angel and Doyle.

Screw it. You've got immortal vampires in the mix. The people who are offended by age gaps just need to stay offended and recognize that the story will never be for them. And forget having another Angel with a spinoff if you're not willing to actually tell his story with Buffy or try to minimize him in favor of having the love triangle (which never happened at the same time--it was never Twilight or The Vampire Diaries) too early.
 
Last edited:
Anyway, I just thought those A.I. trailers, as disturbing as the technology can be used wrongly with, are an interesting proof of concept that doesn't cater to any of the worst reboot trends and makes it a bit more interesting.

It also proves that there is still interest in the property that two different YouTubers who don't just make Buffy videos took a stab at the same reimagining.
 
Those AI trailers were cute, I really like the 50’s style concept to the show! (They both did Angel and Giles dirty though, lol)

That said, I lost all interest in The Winchester’s as soon as I heard it was an AU show. I spent 15 seasons invested in SPN, why would I want a new show that ignores the majority, if not all, of that and just cashes in on familiar character names?

So, I guess I’d feel the same here. It’d probably be like the new Sabrina for me. I’d dig the aesthetic, but ten minutes in the crappy dialogue would have me turn it off forever.

I’ve no doubt there is genuine interest in the franchise though.

Wasn’t Slayers just an audiobook thing? Cause that feels more aimed at the hardcore fans than actually trying to reach a new audience, to me.
 
To continue from the post written by HowiMetdaSlayer. I consider that the two attempts as shown by NileQT87 are sufficient to make sure I would have disliked the show.
Buffy has a dagger? I would never have considered a wooden stake to be a dagger, would our hero Mr. Pointy have chosen Mr. Pointy as his username if it was a dagger?
Xander is a nice guy, really in what universe.
Where is Darla, call me biased if you want but where is the cutest of all cute vampires, Darla?

My memories of the TV show are far better than those crap attempts.
 
Last edited:
NotASlayer
NotASlayer
What about Dru? If your definition of cute runs to "somewhat insane."
The issue seems to be that it is "Buffy" that is the most valuable part of the franchise. So, it looks like Di$ney is most interested in Buffy herself, not AUs or other time periods. Slayers explored an AU and was cancelled after one season, despite being successful from everything I can tell. I would rather AUs and period pieces than a reboot, but a reboot seems the most likely thing to happen.

At this point I’d just like for something to happen whatsoever. BtVS comic omnibus/re released through Marvel, a proper remaster of the show, giving the animated series a shot a la X-Men 97’, just anything. I’d even take a Buffy skin in Fortnite. Just give us something to remind everybody the show even exists. Either that or license it out to people so we can get licensed games or new comics that are worth reading or just anything, really.

Instead the franchise is languishing with good (if horrendously marketed) novels, atrocious comic books from BOOM!, and absolutely nothing else of substance.

Granted, this is just a huge issue with Disney at the moment anyways. Star Wars is continually slanting towards less and less live action or animated content, for example. The only franchise they’re bothering trying to do anything with at the moment is Marvel, which feels like it’s on its way out the door (outside of the comics)
 
At this point I’d just like for something to happen whatsoever. BtVS comic omnibus/re released through Marvel, a proper remaster of the show, giving the animated series a shot a la X-Men 97’, just anything. I’d even take a Buffy skin in Fortnite. Just give us something to remind everybody the show even exists. Either that or license it out to people so we can get licensed games or new comics that are worth reading or just anything, really.

Instead the franchise is languishing with good (if horrendously marketed) novels, atrocious comic books from BOOM!, and absolutely nothing else of substance.

Granted, this is just a huge issue with Disney at the moment anyways. Star Wars is continually slanting towards less and less live action or animated content, for example. The only franchise they’re bothering trying to do anything with at the moment is Marvel, which feels like it’s on its way out the door (outside of the comics)

Disney seems to be treating a lot of their IPs as cash cows at best, and with cash cows you regularly just milk them for their existing content rather than investing in new. I found the treatment of Slayers as really strange; the IP was licensed to Amazon who actually did something to it at no cost of time or effort to Disney, and had, from every indicator, done well enough to get a second season, yet it was cancelled because... it might cause confusion with a non-existent reboot?

I think Disney needs to stop acquiring IPs and start really doing things with the ones they already have.
 
Back
Top Bottom