AbraxasP3
Townie
Welcome to the hellmouth
This episode is awesome and classic for a lot of obvious reasons. I definitely think it was Joss' way of showing what he wanted Buffy the series to be - a perfect balance of qualities...not completely devoted to slapstick and one-liners that were only stupid comedy. It was a fantastic start for a fantasy show wanting to be taken seriously. I definitely believe that a series modeled directly after the movie would have been absolutely terrible.
Having said that, I thought I would comment on Buffy the character & Sarah's portrayal.
I haven't read much in the way of developing the show - but I can guess that Joss had some preliminary ideas & the rest was probably knowing exactly what he didn't want it to be after seeing what they did to his script for the movie.
What I'm wondering is how much of the portrayal of Buffy in episode 1 was Sarah - how much of it was Joss?
The reason I'm curious is because in my opinion, Sarah's performance is really...spot on as far as the character of Buffy. Her movement, her acting style, her reactions = spot on.
I wonder if Joss choreographed Sarah's movement, speech pattern, etc?
Anybody know?I would like to think that Sarah had a pretty good amount of input due to most of her acting being really fluid & appropriate as far as comedic timing.
For example, Buffy's first real jaunt into the library to discuss the dead body in the locker - How much of that was Sarah?
---------- Post added at 01:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 AM ----------
The obvious answer might be that they both had a little input -- but I'm really curious as to what others have to say on this.
Like I said, I don't know that much about development or production itself, but maybe Sarah was only offered more creative choices as the seasons went on? I guess it's also a question as to how Joss works on a series.
This episode is awesome and classic for a lot of obvious reasons. I definitely think it was Joss' way of showing what he wanted Buffy the series to be - a perfect balance of qualities...not completely devoted to slapstick and one-liners that were only stupid comedy. It was a fantastic start for a fantasy show wanting to be taken seriously. I definitely believe that a series modeled directly after the movie would have been absolutely terrible.
Having said that, I thought I would comment on Buffy the character & Sarah's portrayal.
I haven't read much in the way of developing the show - but I can guess that Joss had some preliminary ideas & the rest was probably knowing exactly what he didn't want it to be after seeing what they did to his script for the movie.
What I'm wondering is how much of the portrayal of Buffy in episode 1 was Sarah - how much of it was Joss?
The reason I'm curious is because in my opinion, Sarah's performance is really...spot on as far as the character of Buffy. Her movement, her acting style, her reactions = spot on.
I wonder if Joss choreographed Sarah's movement, speech pattern, etc?
Anybody know?I would like to think that Sarah had a pretty good amount of input due to most of her acting being really fluid & appropriate as far as comedic timing.
For example, Buffy's first real jaunt into the library to discuss the dead body in the locker - How much of that was Sarah?
---------- Post added at 01:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 AM ----------
The obvious answer might be that they both had a little input -- but I'm really curious as to what others have to say on this.
Like I said, I don't know that much about development or production itself, but maybe Sarah was only offered more creative choices as the seasons went on? I guess it's also a question as to how Joss works on a series.