In Buffy 5, The Chain, we we see this image.
![]()
There's a disturbing entry in Wikipedia concerning the upcoming IDW maxi-series Angel: After the fall. The consensus seems to be that series will be considered canon. The previous IDW Angel comics were not considered canon. Wikipedia tells us a character from the previous non-canon Angel series will appear in the upcoming canon one. They suggest this now transfers canon status to what we previously thought of as non-canon.
Up until this point, what has always added power to the whole idea of a canon Buffy is the idea Whedon is in control of what is and isn't canon. Is he losing that control? Will the line between what is and isn't canon in the Buffyverse become so fuzzy we can no longer distinquish what Buffy canon is?
Wikipedia is problematic because it can be edited by anyone. So we could go in and change that to say 'it may or may not be canon' 😉 There's a scandal over here in Australia (it's an election year) because people in the Prime Minister's office have been changing the details of certain events to suit themselves.
But anyway your post seems very post modern N4H, lol reminds me of being at university. Everything means something, or everything means nothing, and it's all the same, etc. Still I also think finding out what is canon is important to the continuity of the Buffyverse, it's something not many series have. And this doesn't mean we're loosing sleep over it 😉
Also I kept that image of the slayer line in the quote because I noticed something while rereading the comic the other day. The scythe (I forget it's proper name) is only featured with slayers after the first, and not with the Buffy decoy.