Computer Virus

Veyron

Scooby
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
525
Age
59
Location
Newcastle on Tyne UK
Black Thorn
Experts are warning that hackers have yet to activate the payload of the Conficker virus. The worm is spreading through low security networks, memory sticks, and PCs without current security updates.

Experts say users should have up-to-date anti-virus software and install Microsoft's MS08-067 patch. The patch is known as KB958644.

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-067 Critical: Vulnerability in Server Service Could Allow Remote Code Execution (958644)

Users are using weak passwords - 12345, QWERTY, etc - then the virus can crack them in short order - you have been warned.

According to Microsoft, the worm works by searching for a Windows executable file called "services.exe" and then becomes part of that code.

It then copies itself into the Windows system folder as a random file of a type known as a "dll". It gives itself a 5-8 character name, such as piftoc.dll, and then modifies the Registry, which lists key Windows settings, to run the infected dll file as a service.

Once the worm is up and running, it creates an HTTP server, resets a machine's System Restore point (making it far harder to recover the infected system) and then downloads files from the hacker's web site.

Most malware uses one of a handful of sites to download files from, making them fairly easy to locate, target, and shut down.

But Conficker does things differently.

Anti-virus firm F-Secure says that the worm uses a complicated algorithm to generate hundreds of different domain names every day, such as mphtfrxs.net, imctaef.cc, and hcweu.org. Only one of these will actually be the site used to download the hackers' files. On the face of it, tracing this one site is almost impossible.

There was a new variant released less than two weeks ago and that's the one causing most of the problems, the replication methods are quite good. It's using multiple mechanisms, including USB sticks, so if someone got an infection from one company and then takes his USB stick to another firm, it could infect that network too. It also downloads lots of content and creating new variants though this mechanism.

Microsoft says that the malware has infected computers in many different parts of the world, with machines in China, Brazil, Russia, and India having the highest number of victims.
 
S
StuckinTraffic
Thanks for the PSA!
Hopefully I won't get into trouble for bumping my own thread, but it's an important subject that everyone should read and do something about if they haven't already.
 
I'd recommend AVG free. Least resource intensive of all the antivirus programs ive dealt with. Dont even consider Norton or Mcafee.
 
Sweetescape
Sweetescape
Mcafee works fine for me :)
I'd recommend AVG free. Least resource intensive of all the antivirus programs ive dealt with. Dont even consider Norton or Mcafee.

Seconding that motion. Norton seriously screwed up my old computer and it took forever to straighten it out! AVG is great!
 
sweetescape agrees: Mcafee works fine for me 🙂

Tell you what, if you were to do a quick test, download aquamark or 3dmark or whatever with Mcaffee installed vs AVG ...you will be amazed at just how much resources and being stolen by Mcafee or Norton. You may not notice it since youve had for a while but ive been called out to fix peoples 'slow computer' problems so many times solely due to these two software packages. (ohh.. this is my side job btw, Derby Computer Services - Home
 
my password is letters, numbers, and symbols.
I also heard on the radio you need to change your password every 90 days.
 
AVG free is excellent...but seriously people...get a Mac 😉
 
S
Silum
pay twice for half the performance for a little more stability? Ill pass
AVG free is excellent...but seriously people...get a Mac 😉

As much as I like Mac's they're also under threat these days - hackers, virus makers and the like are attacking Mac's too - sure the attacks aren't as prevalent as they are on PC's, but they do happen.

Plus there are a lot of games that won't ever appear on the Mac so that's one reason why I didn't get one when I decided to spend the £1,500 I spent on my PC. Sure Mac's are great for music and graphics creation, but as I don't do either getting one wouldn't be a cost effective home computer for me.
 
Back
Top Bottom