This is one of my favorite plots -- kids separated by his/her parents, an unplanned pregnancy that he doesn't find out about, and a death when it's almost too late.
And they did it well -- I almost cried until MacLachlan's Angel started playing and I started having Buffy/Angel flashbacks.
However, there was nothing new or original about it. He was a soldier, which was supposed to make it timely. His eventual death of a wound received in battle was, I suppose, an attempt at a statement (although Sherman's "War is hell" is still my favorite).
Over-protective papa wanting better for his progeny. This works really well in historicals, because it's really hard to completely cut off communication lines like that these days. So, the future Rhodes Scholar doesn't have an email addy where she can be reached by a determined military man? He can't send her a certified letter, for her hands only? He never once had access to a satellite phone? And papa actually moved because his daughter got knocked up and he didn't want anyone to know. How . . . Victorian. Or at least early to mid twentieth century. By moving, he went to a lot of expense to avoid this guy.
And, of course, because this is "real life" and not a romance novel, "Soldier Boy" dies in the end. And because it is television and not real life, he does it to the strains of Sarah MacLachlan. I wonder if he'll haunt her because she didn't promise him that she would move on.
I get why she didn't. She was whistling in the dark -- if she didn't make the promise he asked her to, he wouldn't die. That, more than anything else, made me want to cry. I knew, at that moment, he wouldn't survive. And I wanted him to! He has a kid, and a girl that he might be in love with, and a deathbed request that she didn't aquiesce to! It's not fair!
Tru wasn't supposed to save his life, just fulfill his last wish. And he didn't say "Help me," I don't think. He said something else, didn't he?
She doesn't save the heroes, does she? The firefighter died, and the soldier. Maybe because they are "doing their jobs"? Or maybe the writers haven't realized that they are killing off the heroes and just figure it's easier to do in a character in when it's one of the hazards of the profession. I like to think that there is a deeper meaning than that. Maybe.
I really did like this episode. It was just something that I would have written when I was fourteen. Actually, they improved (greatly) a story that I did write when I was fourteen. I'm sure that had something to do why I liked it.