I don't see why people make such a big deal about buffy characters being in a buffy comic. They say that Amy, Warren, Riley, Ethan Rayne, and Oz are all "cameos" put in for shock value, but I just don't agree with that.
The problem isn't that the cameos are the shock factor, the cameos are annoying because of how many there are. Think about it...whos left? You're already on to the B-list cameos now.
Warren was in the show heavilly in s6, and appeared as the first in s7. Why not see him one season later?
'Cause he's dead for one!
😛
I'd also like to add that I don't think people would say anything about the old characters being in s8 if the show was televised and aired months after s7. There's no reason why Buffy characters shouldn't be in a Buffy comic, and I'm getting a little tired of all the whining about it.
Sorry if your getting tired, though you don't have to listen to me. Interestingly, I've hardly heard this discussed at all. Though I don't frequent the S8 forum to be fair.
I will definately disagree with you if you think the mass of characters we have seen in the comic would work on screen. The comic relies on people understanding the show
almost entirely. You imagine how much backstory would be needed for all these different characters? Or how silly it would all seem seeing a massive reunion of most all characters, Buffy and Angel combined? Oz, Rayne, Warren, Amy, Riley, Dracula,
Spike, Angel, Faith, Fray, Kennedy, Rona, Andrew, (lets not count the flashback with all the old scoobies back), Robin Wood, and ohh, Harmony. Not a bit much??
Dont get me wrong either, I love the comic. As its own entity. More and more, everyday I separate it from what I see as the show, and I'm ok with that, it works much better when you appreciate it as a wilder version of Buffy and not a continuation. The two simply can't mesh it seems... robo dawn, giant dawn, and talking trees is my reasoning.