brinkster130
Riley's BFF
I believe in both; but I don't have even the slightest idea what either of them would look or feel like. IMO opinion life is just far to complex for it to just end with us rotting in the ground.
"When adults say, "Teenagers think they are invincible" with that sly, stupid smile on their faces, they don't know how right they are. We need never be hopeless, because we can never be irreparably broken. We think that we are invincible because we are. We cannot be born, and we cannot die. Like all energy, we can only change shapes and sizes and manifestations. They forget that when they get old. They get scared of losing and failing. But that part of us greater than the sum of our parts cannot begin and cannot end, and so it cannot fail."
I do tolerate his opinion, but i have watched quite alot of Richard Dawkins, and he is quite pushy and 'know it all' with his 'opinions'. Even though, he knows no more than Anyone else that has ever lived.
You know I'm a fan of Dawkins and I do love reading his books and listening to him speak, but even as an atheist myself I have to say that he does come across as a bit of a pushy know it all a lot of the time, which personally I find rather annoying.
As for the question, no I don't believe in heaven and hell. Sometimes I wish I did, it seems to give comfort to some, but it just goes against everything that makes sense in my head so I can't wrap my mind around it. The whole construct of the afterlife is ultimately too 'man-made' for me. One can never know of course 😉 but even if Blaise Pascal himself gave me his wager I'd still fall on the side of not believing. It's just not in me.
The complexity of the human body needs the complexity of the human mind. Meaning, Humans needed to be designed, and if humans didnt exist, then the universe couldnt exist.
The complexity of the human body needs the complexity of the human mind. Meaning, Humans needed to be designed, and if humans didnt exist, then the universe couldnt exist.