First Dune reviews

Skanky Vamp

Sniffin' the Slayer
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
26,460
Black Thorn
Sounds a lot like the Blade Runner reviews...
from uproxx


Dune is one of the most-anticipated movies of the year — and apparently one of the biggest disappointments. Or it’s a modern-day masterpiece. Either way, you will have a strong response. Denis Villeneuve’s adaptation of Frank Herbert canonical novel, starring Timothée Chalamet, Rebecca Ferguson, Oscar Isaac, Josh Brolin, Stellan Skarsgård, Dave Bautista, Zendaya, Charlotte Rampling, Jason Momoa, Javier Bardem, and some space-worms (good cast imo), premiered on Friday at the Venice International Film Festival, where it was greeted with:

“Here is a film consumed by dreams from even before the moment it starts (you’ll see what I mean), but also one so arch and full of empty spectacle that it keeps your imagination on a tight leash,” “Villeneuve’s film is somehow plodding and hurried at once, flurries of exposition and table-setting ringing around set-piece monoliths”
“endlessly beguiling and just out of reach: a dazzling high-toned space opera written on sand"


But other reviews:
"This is how people seeing 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY back in 1968 for the first time must have felt. The grandeur of this thing is off the charts."
"DUNE Part One is remarkable, stunning, immersive & a truly masterful cinematic achievement. Villeneuve simultaneously created one of the most intimate yet large scale productions I've ever seen."
"I know you’re used to people raving about a movie on social media after it premieres. But trust me when I say Denis Villeneuve's Dune is a masterpiece not just of science-fiction but of cinema. "


I know people talked about how beautiful and boring Blade Runner 2049 was, and I think some of the same things were said about the Arrival. So it looks like Dune is in the same boat. Will be interesting to see it. I just hope we get the second half of the book!
 
I've been somewhat concerned about all of the hyperbolic reviews I've seen online. My thought was, "They're really overdoing the praise here, and I hope people won't end up being disappointed."

I have a feeling it's quite good, though. The casting was PERFECT (unlike the original film, with the exception of Kyle MacLachlan) and Timothee has a wonderful presence for one so young. Then again, Kyle was the same age when HE was cast. (It's just that Timothee seems alot younger than he actually is)

Dune is one of those things (like Doctor Who and Farscape) which is a part of me. Naturally, I take an interest in it.
 
Looks great. Currently sitting at 85 on Rotten Tomatoes.

Dune is my favorite novel and Denis Villeneuve is my favorite director, so hopes are extremely high for me. As soon as I heard he was going to adapt Dune I went out and bought the book. I have since read all six original Frank Herbert Dune novels and his short story, and have started working through the massive expanded universe written by his son Brian Herbert and Kevin Anderson (they've written two sequels, two books set in between the originals, 10 prequels (with another coming next year), and about a dozen short stories and counting). The expanded stuff is nowhere near the quality of the original six books but they're interesting so far and still much better than a lot of expanded universe science fiction (there are some Star Trek and Star Wars books out there that would make a sixth grade creative writing class seem like Shakespeare by comparison).

In my opinion Arrival and Blade Runner 2049 are two of the greatest science fiction films of all time, and Villeneuve said that he made those two movies specifically to prepare him to direct his dream project, Dune.

It was a smart move to only adapt the first half of the novel with this movie. There is no way to do the story justice with one film, and the five hour Sci-Fi Channel miniseries from 2000 just didn't have the vision or budget.
Post automatically merged:

The casting was PERFECT (unlike the original film, with the exception of Kyle MacLachlan)
Kyle MacLachlan was HORRIBLE in the original film. It was like he never even took a single acting lesson before he stepped into the role.

I mean the entire movie sucks badly but MacLachlan's acting was a low point for sure. He has improved since then but that was one of the most wooden performances by a lead actor in a big budget movie I can recall. Keanu Reeves on horse tranquilizers has more emotional range.
 
Back
Top Bottom