From buff to 'Buffy'

Buffy Summers

Yataro
Staff member
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
35,079
Location
The City of Angels
Sineya
From buff to 'Buffy'

Girls with guns and goofy geeks are teaming up to redefine the action hero

By Kevin Forest Moreau

Sylvester Stallone returns to the multiplex this weekend with "Rambo," reprising a character absent from the big screen since 1988. The shirtless soldier isn't likely to receive the same pop-cultural welcome he got during the waning days of the Reagan era: The film wasn't screened for critics locally, suggesting that its studio anticipates bad reviews that could hurt ticket sales.

But John Rambo and other cinematic action icons like him face a far larger problem than scornful critics: They're being swept into irrelevance by a tide of new American heroes, like the retail drone turned reluctant spy of NBC's "Chuck," admired more for their technical skills and a general lack of testosterone. And two new television series based on popular properties"”"Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" and "Bionic Woman""”are spearheading a resurrection of the strong, hard-hitting and sexy action heroine"”action figures who are tougher, less cartoonish, more relatable and just more believable than their beefed-up male counterparts.

So how is it that these two phenomena are occurring at the same time, and what does their confluence say about our current culture?

"In the end, I think they're both two sides of the same coin, two sides of cultural responses to American life in the aftermath of the success of feminism," says Ted Friedman, an associate professor of communication at Georgia State University.

"The term in critical theory that's used to describe this is post-feminism," he continues. "We live in an era defined by the successes that women have had. All those changes are going to be reflected in our media images. And if one side is images of powerful women, then you also have a rethinking of what it means to be male."

In an era when a woman may very well be the next president, "it makes sense that we reexamine action heroes," he says. "Action heroes are often a reflection of American identity. John Wayne and Sylvester Stallone became icons of American-ness. And it's interesting that a woman could step into those shoes."

CHANGING OF THE GUARD

Those shoes wouldn't be available for heroines to step into if the public wasn't palpably hungry for something different from the action-movie formula that's held sway for decades. Big-budget, explosion-filled spectacles"”a great number of them produced by Jerry Bruckheimer ("Bad Boys," "The Rock")"”have become the norm, and the general public regards them as little more than junk food. The sudden reappearance of Indiana Jones, John Rambo and "Die Hard" cop John McClane isn't a coincidence: Studios are increasingly turning to bygone franchises to attract more viewers to a creatively teetering form.

This recent revival of aged action heroes suggests that the icon itself is becoming an anachronism. From "Napoleon Dynamite" and "The 40 Year Old Virgin" to the arrested adolescent males of "Knocked Up" and the actual adolescents of "Superbad," the aggressive macho-man stereotype is being supplanted by a kinder, gentler"”and dorkier"”kind of protagonist: the geek. Michael Cera ("Juno," "Superbad," "Arrested Development") is the new geek sex symbol: moon-faced, skinny-legged, sweet and socially awkward.

Last year's "Live Free or Die Hard" served as a kind of passing-of-the-torch ceremony for these two archetypes, with Bruce Willis' surly McClane grudgingly sharing the stage with Justin Long's young, wisecracking hacker (call them the alpha male and the beta male). It was a textbook lesson in the changing of the guard: McClane solved problems with his gun and his fists; Long's Matt Farrell solved his by text-messaging with a shadowy figure named "Warlock," who turned out to be Kevin Smith, operating from his mom's basement.

"The argument I've heard the most, which seems pretty persuasive, is that it [the rise of the geek] has to do with the rising influence of technology and the rise of hackers," Friedman says. "When I was in high school, to be a nerd or a geek was just shameful and not valued." Whereas today, "the sensibility of these kids is more appreciated and respected."

This social shift isn't lost on Hollywood, which has responded not only by paying more attention to the growing geek base"”soliciting them at comic-book conventions, churning out ever more comic book- and video game-based properties"”but also by placing geeks front and center in movies and on TV. The 2007 fall season alone introduced "Chuck" and "Reaper," both featuring somewhat geek-like protagonists, as well as the sitcom "The Big Bang Theory," featuring two über-brainy nerd stereotypes. And then there's the geek-as-action hero, a line stretching from Tobey Maguire's Spider-Man to Masi Oka's Hiro on NBC's "Heroes."

"The embrace of some of these [programs] shows that at least there's room for more cultural characters than the old geek-nerd cliché"”four-eyed weaklings being pushed around by big guys at the beach," says Friedman. "I doubt that's gone away, but it allows for a wide range of representatives onscreen. You could say it's an extension of gays, African-Americans and other groups seeing themselves onscreen more: a diversification of the cultural landscape."

That diverse landscape isn't just home to twentysomething underachievers who work at big-box retailers and have fantastic adventures. It's also home to the kinds of women those characters are apt to fantasize about: tough-as-nails heroines who can hold their own in a firefight, best their male counterparts in hand-to-hand combat and save the day while looking hot in tight pants and curve-hugging tops.

"Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" debuted on Fox on Jan. 13"”a mere five days, for what it's worth, after Sen. Hillary Clinton won the New Hampshire primary. The series follows in the combat-boot footsteps of 1991's "Terminator 2: Judgment Day," with Lena Headey filling in for Linda Hamilton as the butt-kicking mother of John Connor (Thomas Dekker), the future revolutionary leader constantly targeted by homicidal androids from the future. Headey made her tough-gal bones as Queen Gorgo of last year's hit movie "300," and she blazes through this "Terminator" with all the precision and emotion of a Spartan warrior facing the Persian hordes.

And she's not the only fatal femme on the show: Summer Glau ("Firefly") costars as a terminator named Cameron (a nod to the director James Cameron"”more on him later), who serves as John Connor's bodyguard (and the object of a few lingering glances). The two-part pilot established a geek's ultimate scenario"”two attractive women (OK, one woman and one cyborg) fighting on behalf a young social outcast.

"Terminator" follows on the heels of last fall's "Bionic Woman," based on the '70s "Six Million Dollar Man" spin-off, starring voluptuous British actress Michelle Ryan as twentysomething hottie Jaime Sommers, who becomes a kind of terminator herself when a quasi-governmental agency gives her cybernetic enhancements after a horrible car crash. While Sommers isn't nearly as steely as Headey's Connor, she's just as capable as Cameron of crashing through walls and high-kicking her opponents into submission.

These new (albeit recycled) heroines are the latest in a recent line of tough female pop-cultural icons that includes Kara "Starbuck" Thrace from "Battlestar Galactica" (Katee Sackhoff, who also has a role on "Bionic Woman"); Sydney Bristow ("Alias"); the now-canceled "Veronica Mars" (played by "Heroes" actress Kristen Bell, the current queen of geek pin-ups); Milla Jovovich in the "Resident Evil" flicks; and the toughest, sexiest and unlikeliest take-no-prisoners heroine of all: Buffy Summers of the cult hit series "Buffy the Vampire Slayer."

"Female heroines like Buffy don't have perhaps the same element of unreality that male superheroes do," says Andrea Wood, a post-doctoral fellow at Georgia Tech who specializes in modern media and gender/sexual issues. "They retain a very strong hold on their humanity and have vulnerabilities. They sometimes crack under the pressure they're dealing with, but still manage to save the day, as it were. What's important to me as a scholar of popular culture is the fact that these characters do uphold sort of feminist principles"”empowered women in charge of their lives, in charge of their sexual agency."


DOUBLE STANDARD

If it's easy enough to trace the rise of the geek in modern culture, pinpointing the birth of this action-heroine renaissance is a little more complicated. We know that the two newest additions to the party come from franchises stretching back to the '80s and '70s. But where did the demand for these buff babes come from?

"I think there's a very real possibility that some women are dissatisfied with current male leadership," says Wood, pointing to the role of women voters in Clinton's New Hampshire win, "and maybe looking toward both realistic and fantastic representations of female leaders."

There is, no doubt, some validity to that theory. But given the sex appeal of these rock-hard heroines, it's safe to wonder if there aren't other factors at work.

"It's relevant to consider how female heroines do still tend to prescribe to ideals of femininity," says Wood. "They're generally white, thin, beautiful and heterosexual, for the most part, while male heroes don't have to be attractive. There's still a double standard at work."

That double standard is as old as female action heroes themselves. From '70s Blaxploitation flicks like "Foxy Brown" and "Cleopatra Jones" to "Halloween" and other horror movies, heroic female exploits have gone hand in hand with heroic female exploitation. And the original 1992 "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" movie was more a vehicle for nubile Kristy Swanson to dress up in a cheerleader outfit than a feminist manifesto.

Even the mother of all superheroines, Wonder Woman, wasn't immune. Decades before Lynda Carter battled evildoers in skimpy Amazonian garb in the '70s TV show, the comic-book heroine was subjected to mistreatment on a regular basis. Her creator, psychologist William Moulton Marston, was notorious for including scenes of female bondage in almost every issue.

"What are the consequences of these kinds of images?" Friedman asks. "Are you producing titillating images and these strong women are just an excuse?"

It may not be that simple. While most creators doubtless feel a responsibility to present positive examples of feminine power and accomplishment, Friedman believes they're torn between that impulse "and what always exists in this culture: the tendency to sexualize women and reduce them to their sexuality."

The solution to that tension, he says, is simple: "to have strong, assertive female characters but to milk the [idea] of exploiting sexuality and titillating male viewers."

For proof, he points to examples as diverse as the "Charlie's Angels" movies and Jennifer Garner in "Alias." "The women are allowed to kick serious ass," he says, "but clearly what makes it go down easy for American audiences is that they're wearing these skimpy outfits.

"Ideally, there's a way to come up with images of strong, powerful women that incorporate images of their sexuality that are sexy but not exploitative," he says. ""˜Buffy' is the absolute best of all these examples," he says, "in the way it was savvily able to play it both ways. She was a pretty explicit feminist but also had sex appeal."

Wood agrees, noting that some of Buffy's antecedents erred on the side of not being sexy enough, at least for some audiences.

"When you talk about Linda Hamilton in the "˜Terminator' films, there's an interesting contrast between the first and second movies," she says. "In the first one, she's vulnerable, fairly inept, relies on the male character. In the second one, she's almost asexual, if you will, not an object of desire nor a desiring object. There was a lot of talk at the time the film came out that wasn't actually ideal in the cultural consciousness to have a woman like that be so physically buff "¦ Whereas if we look at characters like Buffy and some of the other current female lead characters, they tend to embody a more noticeable femininity both in their appearance and their clothing aesthetic."

BLAME JAMES CAMERON

It's worth noting, perhaps, that both "Terminator 2" and "Aliens""”which more than its predecessor established Sigourney Weaver's Ripley as a new kind of action heroine"”were directed by James Cameron, who also first introduced the mass public to Jessica Alba with the series "Dark Angel."

"I think James Cameron was a director who really demonstrated the extra edge and interest that having a female action hero rather than a male action hero can have," Friedman says. "We're so used to the clichés of a strong male action hero that Cameron found a way to do something what that character type that was explicitly feminist and also presented a different approach, like Sigourney Weaver being a surrogate mother in "˜Aliens.'"

But with 1998's hit "Titanic," Cameron also bears some of the blame for the current shift in our perception of leading men: what Friedman describes as "the rise of sensitive, if not androgynous, then at least metrosexual action heroes like Leonardo DiCaprio." As Leo and other nontraditional action stars like Tobey Maguire came to prominence, he says, "you saw the beginnings of a new icon of masculinity that was less about brute strength and hyper-masculine fantasy."

It's that new definition of masculinity that unites such seemingly polar opposites as Headey's no-nonsense Sarah Connor and geeks like"”well, like her son John. Both the butt-kicking babes and the charming geeks are asserting themselves in the cultural landscape by embracing those parts of their personas that don't conform to the macho-man stereotype, while at the same time retainingnough ingenuity and physical aptitude to avoid charges of wimpiness"”and, in the ladies' case, rocking a sweat-soaked tank top.

"Both male and female viewers are looking for stories and characters that challenge traditional gender assumptions and challenge our traditional notions of what a hero is," Friedman says. "As contemporary gender roles have changed"”and I put this all in the context of changes wrought by feminism: women entering the workplace, having more and more parity, earning more than men"”you have a sort of redrawing of the lines of power in a way I think is ultimately healthy for both women and men." SP

Source: From buff to 'Buffy' > SundayPaper.com > The Sunday Paper :: All you need to know.


Courtesy of Whedonesque.com
 
Very interesting. Thanks for posting. I enjoyed the part about Buffy: "and the toughest, sexiest and unlikeliest take-no-prisoners heroine of all: Buffy Summers of the cult hit series “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.”
 
I'm usually a little wary when people claim that the feminist movement has "succeeded" or is "over." After all, human nature being what it is, men (as a group, not necessarily specific men) are going to try to dominate women physically, emotionally, and politically. I think Feminism is a never-ending struggle against our very nature. When people say it's "over," they're saying we can quit fighting, and to me, that's the way back into the Victorian era.

Just my 2 cents.

Overall, though, very well-thought-out article.
 
Yeah, thanx for curious article.
Hm, regarding Buffy and Feminism, recently I came across and article where author gradually explains why exactly Buffy isn't a feminist.

Edit:

I didn't gave a link at once - had to look for it again.

So here's the source:

Buffy The Feminist Slayer
 
Kean
Kean
Do you have a link?
Thanks for that link, UG; I didn't have time to read all of it yet, but it looks very interesting and like something I might be able to use for my thesis (which is the basis of all my value judgments these days ::huh1:🙂.
 
Back
Top Bottom