Harry Potter

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont get the "oh the writing sucks" writibg doesnt have to be amazing to still enjoy a book.

I agree but it seems to depend on what you compare to. Most people on the boards might agree with this statement. At least until it comes to Twilight. Then i's perfectly fine to complain about the bad writing. So I guess all people got their limits. I wonder there the line for being a snob goes...
 
Finished the first book yet Nix?

Decided to read HP and the half-blood prince before the movie comes out. That way I can complain so much more about all the things I don't like in comparision to the book. As always I'll probably be a bit disappointed the first time I watch it but hopefully I've gotten better to see it just as a movie and not only compare it to the book. At least the movie got good reviews in swedens "biggest" (but not most serious) newspaper, 4 out of 5.

Having finsished Harry, a history last week and now started on this the reminder of how much of the "bad" sides of being a teenager. Now I don't mind it much but the first time around it was something else. I know I questioned if I was gonna like the rest of the series after reading
the order of the phoenix
Even if signs showed before. And now I think that's my favourite book. Guess that just shows that I don't always like change. 😉
 
I used to be the type that would say "Oh, that is NOT in the book!!" and complain about everything they missed like Peeves & S.P.E.W but that died down...until this film. I see a fire at the Burrow in the preview and that does not happen. >:| And that just angered me for some reason.
 
HAHA I'm such a HP buff, and I sit there and go, 'not like the book!' All the way through. But the images and graphics and Emma Watson make me slightly happy.
 
D
DayVBayB
[No message]
I used to be the type that would say "Oh, that is NOT in the book!!" and complain about everything they missed like Peeves & S.P.E.W but that died down...until this film. I see a fire at the Burrow in the preview and that does not happen. >:| And that just angered me for some reason.

Now that you've seen it in context, did it bother you? I know that I still can't get over Faramir's character in LotR despite the fact I know and understand exactly why they made the changes. Did the changes to HBP fit?
 
I used to be the type that would say "Oh, that is NOT in the book!!" and complain about everything they missed like Peeves & S.P.E.W but that died down...until this film. I see a fire at the Burrow in the preview and that does not happen. >:| And that just angered me for some reason.

Right there with you! I was looking at that scene thinking A.) it was totally unnecessary and was only used to have a cool looking shot and B.) The Burrow is very much needed for the wedding in the next one!

I suppose the wedding won't happen though since Bill and Charlie have barely got so much as a mention in the films.
 
I suppose the wedding won't happen though since Bill and Charlie have barely got so much as a mention in the films.
It feels pretty certain that it won't. Considering what happened in the last book and how this movie was it seems there'll be quite a few changes.
 
Now that you've seen it in context, did it bother you? I know that I still can't get over Faramir's character in LotR despite the fact I know and understand exactly why they made the changes. Did the changes to HBP fit?

Whoa...What did they change about Faramir?


And about the Harry Potter thing. I hated that they left Peeves out. I always thought he played an important part somehow. And one thing is to leave things out, but to put things into a movie that wasn't in the book bugs me. OK so it might help the movie or whatever, but by doing that you kinda ruin what the author made! Doesn't matter how much you changed, it's the princip. They might as well go "We don't really need this character or this magic creature."
 
Whoa...What did they change about Faramir?

LotR
They made Faramir a much weaker character. In the book, he was the one that said "If I saw the ring lying by the side of the road, I wouldn't pick it up", IIRC. He was a nice opposite to Boromir who was consumed by his lust for power to save Gondor. In the films, Faramir was also almost consumed by it, but for the reason of gaining his father's approval. That's why he took them on that strange diversion to Osgiliath that doesn't happen in the book. He was more concerned with personal glory to show to Denethor than the fate of Middle Earth. It was a nice enough little character arc, and it was pretty necessary to have something more for Sam and Frodo to do to balance the movie out, but it turned Faramir from a wonderfully selfless character, who was a perfect match for Eowyn later on, into a much weaker one. And I liked the old Faramir!

Oh, right, you just wanted me to say "He took the Hobbits to Osgiliath when he let them go in the book", didn't you?
 
P
Perny
Actually I wanted a detailed explanation. I happen to like Faramir and the whole triology. But I don't own the books so I've never read them
Oh, and if you can, you should watch the director and screenwriter's commentary on the Extended version of the Two Towers. They explain so well why changes have to be made when translating from book to film. It always used to annoy me until I listened to them explaining, and it makes a lot of sense. Also, I enjoyed listening to Jackson, Walsh and Boyens for 12 hours across all three films almost as much as I enjoyed watching the films themselves. They are so funny.

LotR Commentary said:
Fran Walsh: Oh, that's a lovely landscape. Where did you go to film that one Peter? It's beautiful. Was that on the North Island?
Peter Jackson: That's a matte painting dear. It's on a wall in the studio.
Fran Walsh: Oh. It's still lovely.
 
P
Perny
Also...Thanks :D
sk
sk
Good to hear that I'm not the only one. Great commentaries overall on LotR
SNLharry1.jpg
 
How do you know that wasn't the picture I intended to post just to expose that you've been living in a box, CoTA?
I didn't think you would be that cruel. Well i hope you're happy, you've exposed to everyone on the board that will read a thread about Harry Potter, that i live in a box. I'm close to tears right now, and not even my cool haircut and stubble can cheer me up. You bastard, Revolver, you bastard.
 
M
Miss Universe
Love yer sig.
L
Lemon
[No message]
I didn't think you would be that cruel. Well i hope you're happy, you've exposed to everyone on the board that will read a thread about Harry Potter, that i live in a box. I'm close to tears right now, and not even my cool haircut and stubble can cheer me up. You bastard, Revolver, you bastard.

If it helps, your response has confirmed my suspicions that you're one of the coolest dudes on this board!
 
Everyone I've spoken to slates the new movie; but I'm going to see it today and not going to listen to anything I've been told. My friend at school said the end's really lacking, but I don't care. I love HP and am determined to like this movie. xD
 
I thought it kept with the more major plotlines of the book, but I agree that the ending sucked. As usual, they left out some things, but on the whole, I was quite impressed. I think the comedy angle worked for them.
 
Can't say I liked it. If there wasn't Luna, I would hurt more. In my opinion, the book was great, but the movie ruins it. By the way, the new professor was awesome. 😉
 
I thought it kept with the more major plotlines of the book, but I agree that the ending sucked. As usual, they left out some things, but on the whole, I was quite impressed. I think the comedy angle worked for them.

This is pretty much how I felt, but I was pissed at some of the things they left out,
especially Dumbledore's funeral. At least they kept the Phoenix Lament; that made me happier. However, I didn't much like the burning of the Burrow scene. That just didn't make sense to me.
Overall, it was pretty good, I think. I need a second opinion, though, so I'm going to see it again with my dad today.
 
I
InsaneMystic
whaaaaat? that "especially" in your spoiler is missing from the movie??? are they totally nuts?!?
laianna
laianna
I agree. I feel like the things you mentioned sort of took away from it. The one they added was kind of random, too. =/
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom