How much of the Vampire comes from the human?

Black Eye Guy

Taking over the World!
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
8,904
Age
39
Location
Ireland
Black Thorn
This topic comes up a lot in little bits throughout other discussions, and I've seen others suggests that Angel and Spike souled aren't the same people as Liam and William, so I thought it'd be interesting to focus a discussion on it.

So there are a couple of quotes that suggest the vampire is completely separate from the human.

But there's a lot of evidence to suggest they are very similar, like Doppleganger how Vamp Willow was a little gay, how Angelus focused on Liams family, William turned his mother, Jesse focused on Cordelia.

For me, I definitely think the vampire and human are the same person. I think Angelus is just Liam without a soul and Angel is just Liam having gone through all that Angelus did.
 
S
SlayerPrincess
[No message]
I suspect the vampire-demon itself isn't a sentient creature, but more like a disease. Once someone gets vamped, they still have all their human memories, but they have no memories of what the demon was doing before.

I'm not even sure the vampire-demon can be called "evil" by itself. I think all it really does is keep the body physically alive, with the added abilities and vulnerabilities that we see in vampires. The personality of the vampire is simply that of the human, but with no empathy because the soul has been lost.

So a vampire basically has the same personality the human would have had if he or she had been a sociopath. There are many varieties of sociopath... some might be mad-dog killers (like the Fanged Four in their heyday), and some might just seem self-centered and shallow and conceited (like Harmony).

If a person was already a sociopath when he or she got sired, their personality might not change at all. Except that they might be more confident in hurting others because they are more powerful and have less to fear from consequences.
 
One of my favorite Buffy quote and really the most self-explanatory

You die, and a demon sets up shop in your old house, and it walks, and it talks, and it remembers your life, but it's not you.

Essentially, the vampire retains some old personality traits, it's still you because it remembers your life, it remembers who they were, it still walks and talks like if it were you, meaning they don't really change when they become vampire, except they do change because the demon takes over. A vampire is essentially you being controlled by a demon. That is also why I don't hold vampires responsible for their actions, because they can't possibly control themselves. Being evil is the new normal for them. Every vampire has one thing in common, and it is the demon inside them. All of them feed, absolutely all of them, so the demon is universal, the rest is up to the human that used to live there.
 
S
slayer6
[No message]
R
Robb Stark
[No message]
One of my favorite Buffy quote and really the most self-explanatory



Essentially, the vampire retains some old personality traits, it's still you because it remembers your life, it remembers who they were, it still walks and talks like if it were you, meaning they don't really change when they become vampire, except they do change because the demon takes over. A vampire is essentially you being controlled by a demon. That is also why I don't hold vampires responsible for their actions, because they can't possibly control themselves. Being evil is the new normal for them. Every vampire has one thing in common, and it is the demon inside them. All of them feed, absolutely all of them, so the demon is universal, the rest is up to the human that used to live there.

I remember the quote, but dont remember the episode. As far as I recall all the quotes like these were early in the series, when firstly Buffy didn't know as much as she did in later series and it seems easier to say their like that for killing them.

Angel says differently (or was about to) in Doppleganger

Buffy: (reassuringly) Willow, just remember, a vampire's personality
has nothing to do with the person it was.

Angel: (without thinking) Well, actually... (gets a look from Buffy)
That's a good point.

Plus Willow hadn't realised she was gay yet, so Vamp seemingly Vamp Willow goes along a similar development path that Willow takes.
 
[MENTION=5973]Black Eye Guy[/MENTION], the quote is from fairly early on, it's from "Lie to Me" in season 2.

What I was trying to explain in my post is that I'm also in agreement with what Angel says. Yes, the personality is still the same, but the demon still takes over. That's what I meant by the demon is universal, but the rest is up to the person it used to be. I think both quote don't necessarily contradict each other, Buffy states that the vampire isn't you, which it's not, because you wouldn't go around killing people. But I always got from the whole walk, talks and remembers like you as a hint that the personality could stick. Of course, she contradicts that in the quote you mentioned with Angel. You're right, she probably only realizes that later on, I still believe she was also right in her first saying though.
 
. I think that when the demon takes over the person that person's memories and personality traits and forces the soul out. I believe that while the vampire has the same personality it is not the same person. I just believe that since the demon gets those memories and personality traits that it seems to be the same person but it really is just evil and murderous by nature and the person from before has no control over what the demon does. This leaves the question what happens when the vampire gets a soul? well I guess the soul ads that person's sentience back to the body and the soul then takes over again. For example when the demon was going after Giles for raising him Angel allows the demon to go into him and the demon inside angel and the one he allowed in battled it out. Angel said the demon in him had been looking for a fight which sais to me the demon is still in him since he got a soul but is lying dormant.
 
I like [MENTION=8404]Blaze[/MENTION]'s theory a lot. It seems to make the most sense from what we're shown in the series, and it isn't contradicted by what Angel says in S3.
 
I think that the vampire's personality upon first rising is basically the same as the human host's was, minus the soul, which, in the Whedonverse, is basically a conscience and the ability to differentiate between right and wrong. As time passes, that lack of a soul allows the darker side of the host's humanity to emerge, becoming more and more dominant. That domination varies in individuals, depending on how dominant the human's personality and sense of ethics. That explains why some vampires, like Spike, retain things like the ability to love and still have a rudimentary sense of ethics, while others, like the Master and Angelus have neither.

Also, the more powerful and ruthless that dark side becomes over time, the more demonic the host vampire becomes, like the Master or Kokistos
 
S
slayer6
[No message]
It's easy to imagine that Angel and Angelus are two different people.

But it's harder to think that season 6 Spike and season 7 Spike are two different people.
 
What I wonder is, in the Buffyverse, when someone gets turned into a vampire, after they awake as a vampire, and then after their soul is restored (Angel and Spike), do they not only remember the things they've done as a vampire due to their brain having experienced it, but is it as if they were actually present when it happened?

It's the same question I ask about Sci Fi stories where someone's consciousness is transferred into a robot or another being. Is it just a copy of their consciousness, or is it their consciousness itself, so that they're awareness of themselves would remain constant from one location to the next? Or would it just seem to be them because it would be an exact copy?

- Tim
 
What I was trying to explain in my post is that I'm also in agreement with what Angel says. Yes, the personality is still the same, but the demon still takes over. That's what I meant by the demon is universal, but the rest is up to the person it used to be. I think both quote don't necessarily contradict each other, Buffy states that the vampire isn't you, which it's not, because you wouldn't go around killing people. But I always got from the whole walk, talks and remembers like you as a hint that the personality could stick. Of course, she contradicts that in the quote you mentioned with Angel. You're right, she probably only realizes that later on, I still believe she was also right in her first saying though.

I definitely think theirs something to that. Like in season 9 we have vampires created with no magic, so no demon is actually infecting the human, they basically become mindless killing machines.
So I think your right about some kinda general demon/disease, with no personality taking over the human.

I think that the vampire's personality upon first rising is basically the same as the human host's was, minus the soul, which, in the Whedonverse, is basically a conscience and the ability to differentiate between right and wrong.

Actually this was something I forgot to ask in my initial post, and it's just a general question not just directed at you.

Are Souls and a persons conscience the same thing? Does a soul make up who you are, since the soul remembers the actions taken when it goes back into a body?

That domination varies in individuals, depending on how dominant the human's personality and sense of ethics. That explains why some vampires, like Spike, retain things like the ability to love and still have a rudimentary sense of ethics, while others, like the Master and Angelus have neither.
Since Spike and Harmony have a similar development when they become vampires, I think it almost implies that that a weaker personality works better. William was shy, quiet and didn't have much presence as a person Harmony was the opposite but she was shallow and had to surround herself with cool to be cool, which is what Spike does with Angel, Drusilla and Darla.

---------- Post added at 09:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:16 PM ----------

What I wonder is, in the Buffyverse, when someone gets turned into a vampire, after they awake as a vampire, and then after their soul is restored (Angel and Spike), do they not only remember the things they've done as a vampire due to their brain having experienced it, but is it as if they were actually present when it happened?


Actually this was more what I was trying to ask when comparing the soul and personality. We know Angels soul is outside his body cuz it has to be called into the Orb, or we see it kept in a jar, but everything the show suggests that Angel/Liam is still in there the whole time having to watch everything that happens.

It almost seems like the soul is just a universal good or bad measurement device for the person, like a conscience, and doesn't actually contain any of the person, but is still tied to them.
 
Are Souls and a persons conscience the same thing? Does a soul make up who you are, since the soul remembers the actions taken when it goes back into a body?


Since Spike and Harmony have a similar development when they become vampires, I think it almost implies that that a weaker personality works better. William was shy, quiet and didn't have much presence as a person Harmony was the opposite but she was shallow and had to surround herself with cool to be cool, which is what Spike does with Angel, Drusilla and Darla.

We know that the first reaction that both Angel and Spike had upon receiving their souls was an overpowering rush of guilt, so, yes, I would say that the soul, according to Whedon, at least, is primarily a conscience, and possibly the ability to feel the gentler emotions, like love, honor, and the like.

And while we know almost nothing about Harmony's life outside of Cordelia's shadow, it's impossible to say about how much she was loved at home, we do know that Liam was pretty much an outcast by his father, while William was deeply loved by and devoted to his mother. It's hard to make any kind of accurate assessment based on only those two individuals, but it leads me to believe that how close the human was with loved ones might have a significant influence in how the vampire turns out.

As for strength of personality, once more, outside of Cordelia's shadow, I don't have much to go on about Harmony's personality, other than that she appeared to be more of a follower than a leader, and William seemed to be a man who kept to himself and avoided being provoked into any sort of confrontation. Neither one would be what I would call dynamic, but that doesn't mean that they are especially weak.
 
It's easy to imagine that Angel and Angelus are two different people.

But it's harder to think that season 6 Spike and season 7 Spike are two different people.


Why do you feel it is different in any way? To me it is the exact same thing only different people. Angelus has no soul and Angel does and s6 Spike has no soul while season 7 Spike does. I personally fail to see any difference so I am curious what differences you see.
 
I wrote this on another forum. It looks at the different interpretations of the soul and what implications it can have on the concept of identity.

The two theories as it states are:

Theory 1
: SouledSpike and Angel are seperate from Angelus and SoullessSpike. That is to say there are two spirits inside each of them: the demon who killed without remorse and the human soul which left the body upon vamping and is now in control while the demon is unable to act. For whatever reason the human soul remembers the actions of the demon as if they did them.

Theory 2:
The soul is little more than a conscience so Angelus and Spike are just William and Liam with demon physiology killing, lacking the ability to feel guilty for their actions. Angelus was cursed with his conscience and Spike asked for his back and now they look upon their past actions with a different emotional perspective.

Now I was under the impression that theory 1 was out of fashion and on my other thread, I more or less took it as a given that theory 2 was more or less accepted by the fandom.

However for fun lets see the implications both theories have on the Verse.

Theory 1

Why would we think that?

a) This is the first explantion we are given about vampirism and no other theory has been explicitly shown.

"A vampire ...may have the movements, the memories, even the personality of the person that it took over, but it's still a demon at the core"

b) Wesley echoes this in Disharmony.

"That's not your friend. That thing may have your friend's memories, her appearance... But it's just a filthy demon, an unholy monster"

c) Theory 1 rests on the concept of what the soul is. We have references in canon that state the soul is the spirit.

"But her soul ... her essence ... I mean, that could be somewhere else."

In this context the soul has to mean the spirit. I wouldn't make sense to talk about Buffy's conscience being in a hell dimension.

Angel: "He dies, the very instant his soul leaves his body, I'm through this door and I'll kill you both!"

Again, in this context if you replace the word 'soul' with conscience is doesn't make sense.

Now all of these are all well and good but this is the one that really takes the biscuit.
WESLEY
I watched it gut her from the inside out. Everything she was is gone. There is nothing left but a shell.

ANGEL
Then we'll figure out a way to fill it back up.

SPIKE
The thing only took over her body. Just a tip of the theological.

ANGEL
It's the soul that matters.

SPIKE
Trust us. We're kind of experts.

In context of the episode, they are clearly talking about Fred the person, not just her conscience. And Spike, Spike of all people seems to be supporting this. We can't argue that's it's a figure of speech or not coming from the vampire with souls in question nor can we say it's a rationalization. The soul can only mean one thing right? So seen as it’s more explicitly used as the spirit, that must be what it is.

Problems, inconsistencies and how to deal with them

a) Ryan Anderson, the boy without a soul: Under this theory it's problematic because he'd be dead or a zombie without a soul, unless he has a vampiric demon animating his body. However it's likely the demon wasn't being literal. He meant that it in the way that someone might call another 'soulless' without believing in the soul. He basically meant the kid was a class A jerk, but he did have a metaphysical soul.

b) Carpe Noctem: For some reason Liam remembers Angelus’ acts even though he didn’t do them, but when Marcus’ soul possesses his body, he doesn’t. Although this is never totally explained, it’s likely it’s to do with the right soul and the right body. Think this is speculation? See Buffy and Faith’s body switch. Tara states that if the wrong soul is in the wrong body, it fragments. Liam and William’s souls have a natural synergy with their original bodies despite the fact that they are vamped.

What Does It Mean for Angel and Spike’s Redemption?

It simply means they are deluded in thinking they did all the horrible things their evil counterpart did. They feel as though they did them, but they didn’t. Angel isn’t responsible for turning Drusilla into a vampire, nor is Spike responsible for the AR or getting a soul, that was the demon.

In other words, as far as the deeds of Angelus and soullessSpike are concerned, Angel and SoulledSpike have nothing to make up for.

Theory 2

Why Would We Think That?

a) Spike and Angel’s apparent continued consciousness. They more consistently say “I did this” or “I did that”.

b) The curse would make no sense. Who are they trying to make suffer? Who are they talking about when they say “He must suffer as all his victims have suffered”. Under theory 1 it simply doesn’t make sense.

b) In Living Conditions, it wouldn’t make sense either. It makes more sense that she’d be stealing her conscience, rather than well, Buffy’s entire immaterial being.

c) In Carpe Noctem, under theory 1 why doesn’t Marcus have Angel’s memories? If they are a physical part of his brain then surely he’d be able to remember, like Liam somehow remembers. It seems more likely that the spirit and the soul are two different things.

d) If the Ethros demon is being literal, this is the only theory that make sense.


Problems, inconsistencies and how to deal with them

a) As it’s been said, it’s likely the WC said that vampires are not the same quantitative
people as their human counterparts because it would b counterproductive for their slayer to think they are dealing with say family members who kind of are the same but different…That or they are simply wrong.

b) Why do people say “soul” when they are clearly referring to the spirit?: The reason being is that they are either mistaken or like in the real world, there are the same words that refer to two different things. In this case the soul can refer to both the spirit and the conscience.

c) What about Spike and Angel’s comments in Shells?: We’ll admit that it makes more sense that Angel and Spike were referring the soul as spirits but I will say one thing, Angel and Spike may be a lot of things, brave champions, skilled warriors but renowned metaphysicians they ain’t.

d) The existence of the spirit doesn’t deny the existence of a mystical ball of conscience.


What Does It Mean for Angel and Spike’s Redemption


This most closely fits the idea of Angel and Spike’s redemption. It makes very little sense to make up for something you didn’t do.

Well Theory 1 or Theory 2?


Well I’d choose theory 2 with option of theory 1 as a possibility. Why? Because it’s mildly more satisfying than theory 1. I’d still state that under either theory there are no apparent metaphysical differences between Angel and Spike aside from Angel’s happiness clause. The differences appear to be psychological in their nature.

Problems, inconsistencies and how to deal with them

From an outside the show perspective, simple inconsistency, which Joss more or less admitted. From the inside the show perspective, it’s simply that some people are wrong and some are right. Under either theory we have to explain the certain inconsistencies, so it really depends on which one you like the best and how you can justify it.

What Does It Mean for Angel and Spike’s Redemption?

I’m one of the few people who aren’t bothered by Spike and Angel’s redemption because under either theory it’s at least a little problematic. Under Theory 1 it’s virtually totally brainless. If Angel knows the truth, (that the soul and the demon are separate) then he’s an idiotic masochist, either that or he’s simply mistaken and from his perspective he can’t tell the difference.

Even under theory 2, it’s still a little odd to make up for your misdeeds from when you didn’t have a conscience. It implies you should be blamed for not listening to a conscience you don’t have?? What the soul gives you, keeping in mind Spike’s apparent guilt without a soul, seems so mysterious that it hardly seems right to judge them morally, or at least not in the same way as one would if they had a soul and if it doesn’t make a difference? Why all the fuss about having one or going out to get one? To me, the concept of redemption under theory 2 doesn’t make much more sense, it’s merely little less senseless.



I've revised theory 2 somewhat by resisting the temptation of simply saying the soul is a conscience. I argued that it is a metaphysical force that can change the individual emotional responses to certain actions, which would give the impression of a conscience. It doesn't mean that without this force, one cannot feel anything, such as love or even some forms of guilt, but it does have a profound psychological effect, which can differ from the individual (much like different chemicals and drugs can affect different people in a variety of ways)

Vampire Identity

Regardless of which theory we subscribe to, we still have the problem of trying discern how much of the person is left over after vamping.

If we just run with theory 2 for a second, just for simplicity: Perhaps the best way to think of personality, is to think of it as more persisting traits, which could be the result of genetics, experiences and in the case of the 'Verse different metaphysical forces, be it the soul, be it a demonic blood-lust etc.

There seems to be some sort of psychological 'clarity' that most vampires seem to feel when they are turned although this clarity may manifest in different and sometimes unpredictable ways.

If you think of the resulting behaviour in the same way one may think of the results of a chemical reaction, then you have the the demon blood-lust (which in its purest form is the thing we see Angel turn into in Pylea.) and the person's original spirit. Now the combination of the lack of soul and this demonic force and the varying traits of the spirit result in varying manifestations of behaviour, sometimes unpredictable.

The lack of information of what exactly the soul is, leads me not to judge vampires in the same way we might do humans. We have plenty of evidence that there isn't always a strong correlation between the morality of the preceding human and the subsequent vampire. If Angelus is worst vampire recorded, then why isn't Liam also hugely depraved by all standards and why does his soulled vampiric counterpart aspire towards redemption and heroism?

While certain traits may persist whether human, soulless vampire, or soulled vampire, each of these states, on top of an array of other influences, can also have a profound, sometimes unpredictable, effect on the individual.
 
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
Nice! Love a good theory!
tbessie
tbessie
Nice long discourse! Of course, it's probably just the writers using character to serve the story and not paying attention to consistency in the 'verse, but what the hay. :-)
Why do you feel it is different in any way? To me it is the exact same thing only different people. Angelus has no soul and Angel does and s6 Spike has no soul while season 7 Spike does. I personally fail to see any difference so I am curious what differences you see.

Two reasons, I believe, that there is the difficulty in distinguishing soulless Spike from ensouled Spike are that, first, there is no dynamic change in behavior. Spike with a soul is different, but the differences are more subtle, simply because Spike was an established character with a specific personality before getting his soul. Changing him drastically would be in effect creating a new character, something that Joss didn't want to do. It was easy with Angel, because we didn't know anything about Angelus, therefore he actually COULD BE a totally different character.

And, of course, there was no name change for the same reason. Everyone thought of him as Spike. If he came back in Season 7 suddenly wanting to be called William, it just wouldn't have seemed right to all of the Spike fans, and the Angel fans would be complaining about why their favorite has to be stuck with a name more suited for a Las Vegas stripper instead of his real name, Liam, while Spike was now going by a name that should have been followed by "the Conqueror."


(all but that last part, anyhow)
 
I believe that every sentient being in the Buffyverse is some combination of four components: body, mind, soul, and demon.

Body is what it sounds like. Everyone's got one, but if that's all we've got, we are dead.

Mind, or personality, is what we develop over the course of life based on our environment and individual nature. Everyone's got one of those, too, but just a body and mind doesn't do it - the personality alone can't animate the body. (Except in that one weird episode of AtS in which there was a kid who was apparently born without a soul. For my theory to work I have to fanwank that one into the kid being possessed by some lesser demon that the other characters couldn't sense. That episode never made much sense to me anyway.)

The soul is the part that makes humans alive, and makes us human. It's our conscience, free will, and the feature that supports our mind's ability to grow and define us. It would be hard for us to recognize someone's soul without a body or mind, because we're accustomed to knowing ourselves and others through our senses and conscious thought, and the soul doesn't operate through those. We know it's there, though, for the simple reason that we're human and alive.

The demon is the part that takes us into pure speculation, because it's not part of the world we inhabit in real life. But in the Buffyverse, we know that vampires have a demon and no soul. They do have a mind and body, so what we can gather from our observations is that the demon has some things in common with the soul - it animates a body, though not in the same way a soul does, and it allows the mind to function. We can also see how it's different from a soul - instead of choosing between right and wrong, the vampire is set to default to evil.

The only thing that makes sense to me is that a human turned into a vampire will a) lose the soul, becoming a dead body, b) gain a demon, reanimating the dead body, and c) have the original mind and personality transferred onto the demon. Otherwise, the demon (having no mind of its own) couldn't function.

Therefore, the personality of the human who used to inhabit the body is intact, but instead of having a soul to guide its actions and choices, it has a being of pure evil. The level of influence that this human aspect will have on the vampire isn't a matter of the relative power of the mind, soul, or demon; it's a matter of how much the conscience used to influence the mind. In the absence of the soul, the demon is going to do all the heavy lifting. Liam hated his father but chose to get drunk instead of doing anything about it; Angelus chooses murder. William hated to be teased but chose to console himself with bad poetry; Spike chooses murder. Harmony wanted to look cool and be popular, Vamp Harmony chooses to smoke a cigarette.
 
Did Willow understand vampires more than anyone else in the show?
Willow as a person wasn't ok with the woman and woman relationship dynamic. But she saw that the vampire her was ok with it. Soon afterwards Willow became acceptable to that way of thinking.
A lot is said about what a vampire can and cannot do, does it have the memories of the person.
Human in control of the human = Liam
The demon vampire as a human = Angel
The demon Vampire in control = Angelus
Does a soul come into the equation, does a soul stop a person from killing = no.
If a soul does stop a person from killing, what is Giles?
 
S
slayer6
[No message]
Why do you feel it is different in any way? To me it is the exact same thing only different people. Angelus has no soul and Angel does and s6 Spike has no soul while season 7 Spike does. I personally fail to see any difference so I am curious what differences you see.

Two reasons, I believe, that there is the difficulty in distinguishing soulless Spike from ensouled Spike are that, first, there is no dynamic change in behavior. Spike with a soul is different, but the differences are more subtle, simply because Spike was an established character with a specific personality before getting his soul. Changing him drastically would be in effect creating a new character, something that Joss didn't want to do. It was easy with Angel, because we didn't know anything about Angelus, therefore he actually COULD BE a totally different character.

And, of course, there was no name change for the same reason. Everyone thought of him as Spike. If he came back in Season 7 suddenly wanting to be called William, it just wouldn't have seemed right to all of the Spike fans, and the Angel fans would be complaining about why their favorite has to be stuck with a name more suited for a Las Vegas stripper instead of his real name, Liam, while Spike was now going by a name that should have been followed by "the Conqueror."


(all but that last part, anyhow)

I have to day I dont think this is the answer at all, mainly cuz I think it's irrelevant to a discussion to combat a point with something in the show. Whatever happened in the show becomes what that character did so still has to be explained within the show.

There are indeed subtle differences, anyone that claims he's exactly the same is lying, but more important to the subtle differences is the glaring similarities, it's not that people dont see the differences, it's that they still see the similarities, they still see his lack of guilt and his view that getting his soul was enough for him to be forgiven.

In all theories about how the soul and vampires work, he doesn't fit. He doesn't feel a lot of guilt to the point where he wants to do good to make up for the many bad things he's done, so he seems to be able to separate himself from his pre-souled self. But he also takes credit for getting the soul - so how does that work, how can be believe he's changed and not be the same person anymore, but still take claim to what that person did as his own good deed?

[MENTION=7540]Kana[/MENTION] I like both your theories, I think I'd subscribe more to theory 2.

Theory one, Works in principle, that they are not the same person. But even in the evidence to support it, I could question the first quote and Wesleys, as both are from characters who got their training from the Watchers council, and I dont think they'd have actually given any research to the personalty of a vampire, or if they did they wouldn't be teaching that to their employees. Even Wesleys answer that it's an 'unholy beast' seems biblical, which there isn't a lot of in the series, it seems like something thats been ingrained in him

Same with both the Faith/Buffy and Angel/Marcuz body switch, unless I'm mistaken they are referred to as a body switch, not a soul switch, so I think it makes sense that the soul and memories get switched back and forth and each individual person keeps their own at all times.

I do agree that there is probably a bit of just calling someones life/conscience/spirit a soul and the soul being used as a general heading for all of it.

But at the same time, if they are completely separate I could understand why if Liam and William got back into the bodies and could remember everything from their respective views in the first person why they'd say "I did"

We know that the first reaction that both Angel and Spike had upon receiving their souls was an overpowering rush of guilt, so, yes, I would say that the soul, according to Whedon, at least, is primarily a conscience, and possibly the ability to feel the gentler emotions, like love, honor, and the like.

And while we know almost nothing about Harmony's life outside of Cordelia's shadow, it's impossible to say about how much she was loved at home, we do know that Liam was pretty much an outcast by his father, while William was deeply loved by and devoted to his mother. It's hard to make any kind of accurate assessment based on only those two individuals, but it leads me to believe that how close the human was with loved ones might have a significant influence in how the vampire turns out.

As for strength of personality, once more, outside of Cordelia's shadow, I don't have much to go on about Harmony's personality, other than that she appeared to be more of a follower than a leader, and William seemed to be a man who kept to himself and avoided being provoked into any sort of confrontation. Neither one would be what I would call dynamic, but that doesn't mean that they are especially weak.

Well what I see is both have weak personalities, I think the fact that Harmony has to be in Cordys shadow, or surrounded by cool people to build herself up, while Spike was in his mothers shadow. Both of them didn't have a distinct personalities, I guess what I'm theorising is that someone with a bigger personality when turned is a bigger evil, further away from the version of them that has a soul. Both Spike and Harmony dont have much of a personality and both dont cross over into big bad territory. They both flirt back and forward between bad and good, and maybe thats becasue there wasn't much personality to build on from their human version.

Both become personalities after they are sired, the vampire makes them who they are, forms more of them then there was to begin with, they develop becasue of the vampire. Whereas Liam has a personality (a crappy, drunk one) but he's got a big personality and it could be argued that he doesn't become the person he is becasue of the vampire, but Liam changes becasue of the effect the vampire has on him. Whereas William is who he is becasue of Spike, even to the point of keeping his the name, whihc on paper should remind him daily should remind him he tortured people with railroad spikes. He doesn't hate Spike becasue it is him, he'd be nobody without Spike. Liam hates Angelus becasue it's not him, but he's not the same Liam, he's Angel and doesn't feel he developed to that point becasue of Angelus, but in spite of Angelus and feels the need to correct the wrongs of Angelus.

This for me explains why Spike doesn't change his name, doesn't change his personality drastically or feel huge amounts of guilt. I'm off to ponder this more, may have just had a breakthrough in understanding Spike for myself.
 
Kana
Kana
[No message]
This for me explains why Spike doesn't change his name, doesn't change his personality drastically or feel huge amounts of guilt. I'm off to ponder this more, may have just had a breakthrough in understanding Spike for myself.

Consider this during your ponderings, and feel free to re-watch the pertinent episodes if you care to.

When Angelus received his soul, he was struck by guilt for all of the pain, death, and mayhem that he had inflicted. The immediate reaction that he got from Darla, arguably the closest thing to the person that he cared about most, was condemnation and rejection. He had been cursed! He wasn't "her boy" anymore. He was in all ways less than the Angelus that he had been. If it had been within her power, she would have found the Gypsies responsible and forced them to reverse the curse (which she almost did, but Spike got hungry before the deed could be done)

When Angel received his soul, he, too, was struck with the same kind guilt for his past deeds that Angelus had felt, with as bad, if not worse, results. The difference was that the most important person to Spike was a Slayer who, instead of rejecting him, which she had every reason to do, not only accepted the change, but praised him for making the decision ("risking everything") to regain his soul. No matter that everyone else still saw the monster and near rapist, Buffy saw someone who she could believe in, who could be, and was, a better man ("You may not see it, but I do. I do")

Angelus was condemned and rejected because of his change. Spike was encouraged and praised for his. It took, not years, but decades, before Angel would find anyone, as far as we ever saw in flashbacks, who would, if they knew what he actually was, accept him as anything but a monster and encourage him to become a better man. Spike got the same kind of support and praise within, at the most, a few months after regaining his soul.

That, I believe, is the reason why Spike was able to recover from the initial shock and cope with his feelings of guilt so much sooner than Angel did. The same woman provided the answer for both vampires, but Spike didn't have to wait so long to get it..
 
S
slayer6
[No message]
Kana
Kana
[No message]
Consider this during your ponderings, and feel free to re-watch the pertinent episodes if you care to.

When Angelus received his soul, he was struck by guilt for all of the pain, death, and mayhem that he had inflicted. The immediate reaction that he got from Darla, arguably the closest thing to the person that he cared about most, was condemnation and rejection. He had been cursed! He wasn't "her boy" anymore. He was in all ways less than the Angelus that he had been. If it had been within her power, she would have found the Gypsies responsible and forced them to reverse the curse (which she almost did, but Spike got hungry before the deed could be done)

When Angel received his soul, he, too, was struck with the same kind guilt for his past deeds that Angelus had felt, with as bad, if not worse, results. The difference was that the most important person to Spike was a Slayer who, instead of rejecting him, which she had every reason to do, not only accepted the change, but praised him for making the decision ("risking everything") to regain his soul. No matter that everyone else still saw the monster and near rapist, Buffy saw someone who she could believe in, who could be, and was, a better man ("You may not see it, but I do. I do")

Angelus was condemned and rejected because of his change. Spike was encouraged and praised for his. It took, not years, but decades, before Angel would find anyone, as far as we ever saw in flashbacks, who would, if they knew what he actually was, accept him as anything but a monster and encourage him to become a better man. Spike got the same kind of support and praise within, at the most, a few months after regaining his soul.

That, I believe, is the reason why Spike was able to recover from the initial shock and cope with his feelings of guilt so much sooner than Angel did. The same woman provided the answer for both vampires, but Spike didn't have to wait so long to get it..

Oh yeah I agree with that in regards to their all consuming guilt, the living on the streets and basements guilt. But when I'm saying Spike still doesn't show enough guilt I'm talking about after that, the day to day. Angel feels the need to do good for the sake of good, to right his past wrongs, Spike doesn't really give a toss and is still focused on the same thing he wanted without a soul, getting his prize is still his redemption (to him) not doing good.
 
Back
Top Bottom