Mostly, I thought, "You stupid, ungrateful little twit!" and some other expletives not appropriate to be posted here. I fully realize the severity of what Spike had done, but if Buffy wanted to exact any sort of revenge on him in retaliation, that was her right, and nothing that Dawn should be either obligated or allowed to butt into. And before anyone here starts belaboring me for such an attitude, let me explain.
First of all, this was an issue entirely between Spike and Buffy, and Buffy was perfectly capable of extracting any sort and degree of revenge or restitution that she felt was appropriate.
Secondly, no matter what had happened between Buffy and Spike, it in no way negated the fact that he had been her friend, supporter, confidante, and defender practically from the first minute that she popped into existence in Sunnydale as a shallow, self centered, spoiled little brat. He had suffered for her and literally saved her life on more than one occasion, and had never hesitated a moment in doing so. All of that loyalty, pain, risk, and comfort should have earned him at the very least the opportunity to offer some sort of explanation for what he had done and what he was thinking at the time. But in actuality, that last part goes back to the part where what happened was entirely between Buffy and Spike, and none of Dawn's business, sister or not. That's the ungrateful part.
It didn't involve Dawn, Xander, Willow, Giles, or the guy with the cheese tray. This is not a case of a man overpowering some helpless woman. Both Buffy and Spike are super powered beings, as nearly equal in strength and skill as any two characters in the Buffyverse
It was the first moment that I really loved Dawn. Now she's one of my favorite characters. That was an absolutely crucial step in her character development and I'm so glad they never tried to take it away from her by giving her a squishy moment with Spike or a "Guess-I-spoke-too-rashly" line with anyone else.
Dawn wasn't a big brother trying to protect her helpless little sister from some evil brute, she was a totally normal teenaged girl, about as capable of harming Spike as anyone here would be of punching out an elephant. Her so called "threat" was as ineffective as a lap dog's bark. Furthermore, if she ever had any hope whatsoever of inflicting any sort of harm on Spike, it would have had to be by catching him by surprise, extremely difficult in itself. Totally impossible after warning him that she was planning something, putting him on alert. The only person in the town capable of actually harming Spike was Buffy, and she should have been the one left to handle the situation.
You'd have felt differently about it if the character had actually been Dan, Buffy's older brother and it was him saying it? Why is it any different because it's a female saying it? The (justified) anger and the hurt behind those words remain the same.
Dawn wasn't a big brother trying to protect her helpless little sister from some evil brute, she was a totally normal teenaged girl, about as capable of harming Spike as anyone here would be of punching out an elephant. Her so called "threat" was as ineffective as a lap dog's bark. Furthermore, if she ever had any hope whatsoever of inflicting any sort of harm on Spike, it would have had to be by catching him by surprise, extremely difficult in itself. Totally impossible after warning him that she was planning something, putting him on alert. The only person in the town capable of actually harming Spike was Buffy, and she should have been the one left to handle the situation.
agrees: That is probably the most sensible thing that Dawn could have done, but then, nobody ever said anything about her being sensible.