io9's James Marsters interview

VisionGirl

Newly Human
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
5,253
Age
57
Location
The Joycemobile
Sineya
Warning: very long...but oh so good!

James Marsters reveals the secrets of his dark new Spike comic


After Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel ended, there were persistent rumors that Director Joss Whedon was going to make a Spike movie with actor James Marsters reprising his role as the fan-favorite vampire. It never happened, but now the movie is taking new life as a comic book called Into the Light, written by Marsters himself and coming out from Dark Horse next year!
We had a chance to have a length, wonderful talk with Marsters about what to expect in the comic, why Spike is better than Hamlet, his new TV show, and the biggest regret of his career.


io9: How did you get involved in this project? Did Dark Horse approach you, or you them?

I was at the San Diego Comic Con and I was describing an idea that had been kicking around my head for a long time to [artist] George Jeanty, who draws a lot of the Buffy comic books. And he thought that it was a fabulous idea and that I should definitely get in touch with [Dark Horse editor] Scott Ali. He made the phone call and then I pitched it to Scott over the phone and Scott liked it a lot. It's a story that was going to try to be made into a Spike movie years and years ago.

Wait "” that Spike movie Joss Whedon was always talking about right after Buffy ended?

Yeah! Joss had called me up and asked if I wanted to do a Spike TV movie and I said, "Yes of course. Do you have any ideas?" And he said he didn't really have a lot, and I said that I actually did, and I said that we've never really seen Spike actively go out and get something for himself. He was a character that often reacted to events rather than getting the ball moving himself. But because we have never really seen him achieve something for himself, Joss was like, "Well, what about saving the world [at the end of Buffy season 7], man?" And I said, "Dude, no, I didn't even know what that amulet was going to do."

So being that we haven't really seen him do this before, I thought he should achieve something very small for himself. If he achieves something too grandiose it's going to be really cheesy. So the story was constructed to be the smallest little thing that Spike could go out and get for himself, while also dealing with the fact that he has a soul, that he is trying to survive, he can't fill his needs anymore by killing people, or hurting people, or stealing things from people. He can't feed himself that way, he can't clothe himself that way, house himself that way. But he'll be damned if he's getting a job.

So in the story he's basically homeless at the start, and he's really trying to figure out how this revival thing works, and also how to try to be a good person "” try to be a hero, try to be a decent entity on Earth, and just these little baby steps that are part of, I think, the beginning of a journey from villain to"¦ I don't know if hero is the right word, but a good vampire.

The comic will be set during Buffy season 6, right?

The timeline for Spike is that he goes directly from Sunnydale in Buffy getting burned alive to the offices of Wolfram & Hart in Los Angeles, and then spends a year making Angel's life a living Hell. I was interested in exploring that middle place between villain and hero. I thought that there's a lot of fertile ground and a lot of comedy to be had in a character trying to be good and kind of failing miserably.

So when specifically in season 6 is this set? Because Spike has quite a journey that season.

Yeah "“ it's right after he gets his soul, and after he's gone through the main part of the insanity that he's heir to, being that he has so many victims that have to come back and visit him and bitch about how they he killed them. So he has to go through all that, and once he's not really completely crazy anymore, I wanted to construct a story where he could really get out of Sunnydale and grow a little bit.

Well I was going to say, he's in a pretty dark place in season 6. I mean, everyone in Buffy is in a pretty dark place in season 6, but Spike had the worst of it.

[Laughing] Yeah, he's in danger of "going Angel." He's in danger of starting to feel bad about every damn thing he does. And since that background was already covered brilliantly, it's important that the comic goes a different way. I'm trying not to give too much away about the book, but it's definitely not Angel. It's definitely still Spike.

I always thought Spike is a very good underdog character. You don't want him sitting on top of the golden throne. You don't want him living in too big of a mansion; driving too wonderful of a car. I think it gets rich and interesting and funny when life just kicks Spike in the head.

Can you say who else in Buffy or Angel might appear in the comic?

[Long pause] Ummmmm, I'm going to be a dick about that and I'm not going to tell you. You'll have to read the comic.

Actually I really didn't expect you to answer, but I had to ask.

[Laughing] Okay. You know, I've always had other people tell me where these boundaries were. Without reviewing plot or anything, I can tell you that it's a standalone Spike and that he's on its own. He's making some new friends and some new enemies, causing pain and getting pain from entirely new places.

The title for the graphic novel is Into the Light, right?

Yeah! The journey of Spike, once he gets his soul, is to come into the light and come out of the darkness of evil. That's the basic trajectory of any vampire if you give them a soul. He's going to want to come out of the shadows. But, what happens to a vampire if he gets into the light? He catches on fire. So it's very problematic and complicated to come into the light.

Have you missed playing Spike? He's obviously one of your most defining roles.

Yes, definitely. I once told Joss that Spike might actually be a richer role "” by season 7 "” than some of the Shakespearean roles I've played. I mean, Shakespeare is a better writer, I will say that. Maybe lightning will strike me on the head, or maybe Iron Man will come and blast my head off for that, but I do think that Shakespeare is the greatest writer who has ever lived and probably ever will live. But he only had three and a half hours to dig into Hamlet. He only had three hours to dig into Macbeth. Any of those characters only last for one play, and there's only so many places you can explore.

And after seven years of ripping Spike apart, recalibrating him "“ as an actor I went through a more varied emotional ride than I had with any character I'd ever played, including Shakespearean characters.

Spike started as the big bad. He was built up to be so damn cool because he was designed to die by the 10th episode. But they decided not to kill him off and they immediately had to figure out a way to stop him from trying to kill Buffy, because if he kills Buffy the show is over, and if he keeps failing it's going to become pathetic after a while. So how do you do that? They put a chip in my head and I became the wacky neighbor for a while. Then I was the wrong boyfriend and then I was the guinea pig hero. To go through all that, that's a rollercoaster. That's almost like five different characters in one.

Now that I think about it, Spike did change more than any of the other characters, really.

You know, the original theme of Buffy is about vampires ad a metaphor for the challenges you have to face in adolescence when you realize the world is a messed up place. Your parents are idiots half the time, and your teachers only half-way understand the things they're trying to teach you. How do you face that, realize it, and not give up? eEther on the world or on yourself?

So in Buffy, vampires in general were supposed to be very ugly and very quickly killed off. And it was explained to me that I was only in it for more than one episode because Joss didn't want to go Scooby Doo "” he didn't want to have a different villain every episode. He was trying to develop vampire villains just a few episodes before killing them off. But he never intended for a lot of romantic vampires running around his show. He used to say, "I don't like that Ann Rice crap." He wanted his metaphor and I think that's a very strong metaphor and it's why Buffy lasts to this day.

At any rate, Spike was not an adolescent and he was not human, so he was kind of put in as needed. Like in season 4 they needed a new Cordelia, who was the character in the beginning of the series that would tell Buffy she was an idiot and that they were all about to die. And Cordelia went over to Angel, the spinoff,. So Joss was thinking about it, and I believe it was Sarah [Michelle Gellar] who said, "Why don't you let Spike do that? That'd be awesome." And they tried that for a while and there were three or four episodes where I was running around the sunlight in a smoking blanket, trying to get into the room to tell Buffy that she was an idiot and all about to die.

[Laughing] It didn't really work out so well, and there was a point where, during season 4, I thought it wasn't going to work and I'd become unemployed again. But they found another place for me to occupy. And so I don't know if Spike was ever part of the main storyline. He was kind of put in as needed to help that storyline fit together, but I think when you stitch all that together you're right "“ it was a dramatically varied rollercoaster of a ride for the character. There were a lot of changes.

Was it easy slipping back into the role to write the comic?

In my mind, yeah. [In the Spike accent] I don't think I started talking like this all the time. Maybe I did a little bit, by myself. I'll admit it, I did a little bit. [Back to normal] But no, I didn't go full method actor.

When you're sitting down at the keyboard though, and you're ready to type, you go there in your mind. And I have to say it was quite pleasurable to look at the world through his eyes again "“ above and beyond the pleasure that is just writing. Whether you're writing music or writing a story, there's something about that experience that feels safe and also very exciting. For me.

You've written another Spike comic before "” Spike and Dru, back in 2001. Can you tell us about that?

Yeah! I didn't see how those two characters were ever going to heal the wounds that they got in season 2. In season 2 he knocks her out and carries her into the car, but the fact is she's fallen back in love with Angel and he's not really comfortable with that at all.

So I wanted to rip the characters as far apart as possible in the opening panels of the book, and then devise a way for them to come back, organically, to be a couple again. In the big splash panel, she murmurs "Angel" in her sleep one more time, and Spike throws her out the window and into the sunshine, and she's burning to death on the driveway and he just drives away. I thought that was probably as far apart as I could get these two characters.

But she's mad about that "“ that's understandable. She hooks up with a necromancer to enact her revenge "“ necromancers being wizards whose specialty is dead flesh, so vampires are very vulnerable to them. But the necromancer goes too far and they're forced back together for survival.

So I wanted a really twisted romance and they have a really beautiful make-up scene. They're just sitting at the bottom of a pile of burning bodies "“ stuff like that. But it's a sweet scene! And that was a good experience. That was what I wanted to achieve and that was good.

What's different about writing a Spike comic in 2013 as opposed to 2001?

I feel like I'm a better storyteller than I was back then. I feel I'm better able to communicate what I see as a book and what I want it to end up as and why. Without being a little bitch about it and complaining about things, but really just setting it up where we're going in the beginning. I'm an actor, you know, so I've written a lot of scripts. I haven't actually filmed them, but in writing them you start to understand how to do it better. And I feel like if there's a big change, it's really been in my ability to communicate what I want this thing to be.

That having been done, it's been just a blast. The communication with Dark Horse has just been fabulous. I don't think I've given them any grey hairs, but I've been able to tell them what I want and why. And I invariably get an email back going, "Oh yeah, wow, you're right. That's a good idea."

In the first one, they had wanted to use an artist that was drawing the charactersreally ugly. Like, the whole world was just viciously ugly. And I didn't have the presence of mind to say, "Whoa, whoa "“ don't go there." What I wish I could have said was, "This is a romance." It's a twisted romance, yes, but the way a romance works is that every guy reading this book has to want the female lead "“ want to have sex with her "“ and he wants to be the male lead. And every woman, conversely, has to be the woman and want the guy.

The way we usually do that in romance is we cast good-looking people in those two roles. You don't have to but that's how you normally do that. And if you undercut that, you're going to undercut the power of what we're trying to do.

I didn't have the presence of mind to say that early enough so that could be accomplished and they went with an artist "“ a very talented artist "“ who went for a very horrific slant. And in hindsight I think it's interesting. You know, I never would have thought to do it that way. But it certainly looks like no other Buffy comic book that I know if.

I'm still very proud of it "“ but I had to explain to wonderful Juliet Landau [who played Drusilla] why I was in the middle of something that made her look so much less beautiful than she is in real life. That was hard.

That must have been an awkward conversation.

Yeah, but I mean, lesson learned. If you want something, say so.

I'm going to assume that you have no complaints about Into the Light at this point, art or otherwise.

None at all, man. None at all. If anything, I've just been trying to communicate that it's ok to make this character beaten down. In my script the first thing I say is, "Spike looks like shit." I don't know if they're going to go as far as I imagined. I had imagined the character on the cusp of starvation, really at his last gasp, and I think they may take it back from there a little bit. Probably wisely "“ he's the lead of the story. But I think, from what I've seen, it just looks spectacular.

So in the first comic you were too ugly, and in the new comic now you're too good-looking?

Yeah, well, like I said "“ I hope I'm a better storyteller. I hope I'm not going toward ego. I hope that I'm just trying to make a good story. Also I think that I'm much more secure in Spike's place in the hearts of the audience. When I wrote the first book I'd only been in 10 episodes and I was trying to build a character.

I didn't realize you wrote it was that early during Buffy.

Yeah. I was trying to expand on a character and have the audience care about the character in new ways. And I guess I'm still doing that but I have a wealth of goodwill to draw on. So that gives you some latitude, I think, to play around.

Is there any danger of you forgoing your acting career to write comics full time?

You know, I like to do everything. I really don't think that one has to choose, especially when you're writing. There's these wonderful things called iPads and you can just take that with you and type on a set. You can go in your dressing room and keep typing and if it sucks you can erase it. I just don't feel like I need to choose.

It's harder to schedule acting with my band, Ghost of the Robot. But our last album debuted at #99 on the Top 100 list of iTunes "“ and there were people in Europe trying to get us a on a European tour this summer. And it's hard for me to say, "Yeah I have that time," because I might get something that's interesting to film.

It's very hard. I'm in the middle of this French scifi television series called Metal Hurlant, which is called Heavy Metal over here. Heavy Metal was a very popular comic book "“ it probably still is. It's a very popular movie. It's like a modern Twilight Zone. Very good characters and wonderfully drawn, but horrible endings for everyone involved.

And the first one I did was about an 18-year-old-girl who wakes up in a bomb shelter. Her next door neighbor is down there and he says, "World War III has started, the missiles have already been fired, I happen to have had a bomb shelter "“ didn't have any time to tell you all of this so I just knocked you out and dragged you down here "“ so don't open the front door. And she has to figure out if he's lying, which is wonderful. Really good cinematography, great acting, great props, great special effects. And horrible endings. It's just like, you know that Twilight Zone where Burgess Meredith steps on his glasses and goes, [very dramatically] "Oh no!"

How is that not on the American Syfy channel already?

I think it will be. I think it's a lock. It's just the company in Europe only makes six episodes a year, and they were told wait until you have at least 12 and come back to us and we'll put you on the air.

Were you a comic fan growing up?

Oh my god, yes! I had stacks and stacks. In fact I remember I spent all of my money on comic books "“ to read them of course but also as an investment. I remember after years just taking all of these comics back to the comic book store and just expecting a return on my investment, but I think I only got like three bucks. I was horrified at what happened "“ but I got to read them all.

I was a big fan of Batman. I was a big fan of the Avengers, I was a big fan of Captain America. I'm old enough that I remember Captain America still fighting Nazis. When I read now about what they did with the character I think that he was an anti-Nazi/anti-fascist character, and after World War II he became an anti-communist character. And then the book just died until the '70s when they reawakened the character. But I do remember a lot of German right before people get hit. "Achtung lieber!"

I think that I was more into the Marvel universe, but my brother was really into DC. And between the two of us we cross-pollinated a lot, so I've read some of everything. Love comics.
They're movies, man. They're basically storyboards to movies and I think as long as you can keep the story tight. Because with comics the temptation is because I can do anything I want, let's do it all, and my favorite comics are more tightly focused, like the Frank Miller Daredevil series. You know, that's not a high-budget movie, if you were to make it into a movie. That's like a medium-budget film and it's really on character.

It's like what movies are doing with special effects now. We're discovering that just because we can do it doesn't mean it's the most powerful thing to do. Sometimes tightening the story down to the character's journey will be a little more powerful than taking them all over the map. I don't know if that makes any sense.

If you could write a comic about any of your other great genre characters "“ like Captain Hart from Torchwood, or Brainiac fromSmallville, or Barnabas Greeley from Caprica "“ which one would you choose?

Oh Jesus. Wow, that's a good question. Ummmmm, Piccolo [from Dragonball: Evolution]. Yeah "“ I would like to explore Piccolo's inner journey. Boy, that's trampling on hallowed ground though.

I was going to say, there's already pretty detailed comic about Piccolo called Dragonball Z, though.

I know, but Piccolo is just always off on his own staring off into space. He's always brooding about something and you never really know what it is. So I think it would be kind of interesting to go in there. I don't know "“ it's hubris. In an alternate reality, maybe, I'd like to try that. Or maybe I'd like to write that and not show it to anyone.

What else do you want to tell people about Spike: Into the Light?

Here's a little nugget for you. My beautiful, amazing actress/model wife is in this book and playing the love interest. I wrote it with her in mind. And we sent pictures of her to the artists, so she is playing Dylan in this book. And if you want to, go online and search Jasmine Marsters and you'll see a very beautiful young women. Then you'll buy the book "“ you'll be like, "Christ, I've got check that out."

I can include a picture of her in the interview if you'd like.

That would be awesome! That would be absolutely awesome!

No problem.

You'll get a lot more eyeballs on this interview if you include pictures of her.
http://io9.com/james-marsters-reveals-the-secrets-of-his-dark-new-spik-1468437490


So, my question: did we know about this?! I swear I can't remember hearing about it. I'm really excited about this! How much input does Joss have in this. James mentions talking to Scott Allie & other people at Dark Horse, but not Joss specifically.
 

Attachments

  • ku-xlarge.jpg
    ku-xlarge.jpg
    282.6 KB · Views: 8
Really awesome interview. There was a lot I liked in there. I particularly found interesting the opening bits where he talks about Spike always being tethered to another character, and him wanting to explore that in a more independent way.

Also, finally, no one knew what the hell the amulet did! I knew it was a crap plan lol.
 
Gum Gnome33
Gum Gnome33
[No message]
Yeah! Joss had called me up and asked if I wanted to do a Spike TV movie and I said, "Yes of course. Do you have any ideas?" And he said he didn't really have a lot...

Which once again answers the question of whether or not JW had big plans for Spike post BTVS S7.
 
Wait, so first Nicholas Brendon and now James Marsters too? Talented men and passionate about the franchise as well but I don't know, this feels kinda publicity-driven, don't you think? On the other hand it's not like Buffy comics can get much worse, so why not give them to people who care, right?
 
Last edited:
Ugh, This interview just frustrated me, firstly the fact that Whedon had no clue what to do with Spike but wanted to do a TV movie?!?

How on earth is that a good plan.

Also when is this set? Season 6 after he got a soul and just after he got over being crazy? - He didn't get over being crazy till season 7, so im getting the impression this is not cannon.

Love the idea of Spike doing something for himself, and love that James doesn't see Spikes amulet wearing as some great plan of his that makes him giant hero - as it wasn't, all he did was wear some jewellery, so I like were his head space is for the character, it sounds like someone who actually cares about the character, rather then just throwing stories at him cuz he's popular.

Though I have no interest in a story about Spike in-between being a villain and a hero, season 4,5,6 and 7 was that story, I'd much rather see a Spike story set now, about Spike wanting something for himself.

Also "he can't fill his needs anymore by killing people, or hurting people, or stealing things from people. He can't feed himself that way, he can't clothe himself that way, house himself that way. But he'll be damned if he's getting a job" - if he has a soul, he shouldn't feel the need to kill, hurt or steal (thirst for blood yes, but killing and maiming no), I dont think I'll be checking this out, Spike struggling with this shouldn't be a story post soul, and I dont understand were it fits in if it's set in season 6, post soul, just after being crazy as that wasn't season 6.
 
Wait, so first Nicholas Brendon and now James Marsters too?

James, Juliet Landau and Amber Benson have all written comics in the past, James and Juliet for their respective characters, and Amber as well, though Amber has also written for the Tales of the Slayers graphic novel, and as far as I'm aware, her Slayer is considered canon now. So James writing is not a new thing, though I don't agree with it.

I don't really like the sound of this, not only because it's a Spike-centric comic, but also because of the setting of it. Something like this has the prospect of altering canon in huge ways, just because James feels like it, and I absolutely hate that idea. After the end of the show, fine, have at it, but this could be a bumpy ride with huge consequences - especially considering that James doesn't seem to understand when the comic is actually set. He says S6, but Spike got his soul in the final ep of that season and wasn't done being crazy until mid-way through S7.

Unless Joss has a huge part to play in this, I don't think I'll be spending any money checking it out.
 
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
[No message]
[MENTION=5973]Black Eye Guy[/MENTION]
Also when is this set? Season 6 after he got a soul and just after he got over being crazy? - He didn't get over being crazy till season 7, so im getting the impression this is not cannon.
[MENTION=6332]Lyri[/MENTION]
I don't really like the sound of this, not only because it's a Spike-centric comic, but also because of the setting of it. Something like this has the prospect of altering canon in huge ways, just because James feels like it, and I absolutely hate that idea. After the end of the show, fine, have at it, but this could be a bumpy ride with huge consequences - especially considering that James doesn't seem to understand when the comic is actually set. He says S6, but Spike got his soul in the final ep of that season and wasn't done being crazy until mid-way through S7.

Yeah, I can already smell the rotten stench of retroactive continuity. It's absolutely disgusting. Oh well, we'll see.
 
Black Eye Guy
Black Eye Guy
[No message]
Lyri
Lyri
[No message]
Kean
Kean
JM and DH redefining unnecessary bullshit with this comic. The verse needs this like a hole in the head.
brinkster130
brinkster130
[No message]
I saw this referred as James Martsers' boots story (some plot idea he talked to fans at conventions) so my first thought was Is this the I'm drowning in footwear dream?

nice interview, noneless
 
I saw this referred as James Martsers' boots story (some plot idea he talked to fans at conventions) so my first thought was Is this the I'm drowning in footwear dream?

I heard someone else talking about that, but I have no idea what it's referring to, as I've never heard this story. Considering the cover art shows Spike with the sole hanging off his boot, some people seem to think is exactly what it's going to be and are less than pleased.

I haven't read the interview, because it's LONG and I'm at work, lol, but I heard some people saying that Spike has a not-Buffy-shaped love interest in this comic? If it's true, that is definitely going to ruffle some feathers.
 
I haven't read the interview, because it's LONG and I'm at work, lol, but I heard some people saying that Spike has a not-Buffy-shaped love interest in this comic? If it's true, that is definitely going to ruffle some feathers.

There is going to be a riot!!

I was expecting an uproar about how James said Spike wearing the amulet wasn't something Spike did, thats a point I've had arguments over.
 
I heard someone else talking about that, but I have no idea what it's referring to, as I've never heard this story. Considering the cover art shows Spike with the sole hanging off his boot, some people seem to think is exactly what it's going to be and are less than pleased.

I haven't read the interview, because it's LONG and I'm at work, lol, but I heard some people saying that Spike has a not-Buffy-shaped love interest in this comic? If it's true, that is definitely going to ruffle some feathers.

Her name is Dylan and she is based on his wife (personality & looks.) Which isn't creepy at all...
 
In some ways, this is weird because Dark Horse has said nothing about this- literally, I can't find anything when searching. I would be tempted to think that it's not really going to happen except...there's the cover right there!!
 
brinkster130
brinkster130
[No message]
After the end of the show, fine, have at it, but this could be a bumpy ride with huge consequences

Don't really see the difference between having a comic 'altering the canon after the end of the series' and the comic 'altering the canon via (supposed) insertion in the tv continuation'. Either comics are completely irrelevant to the overall canon or they are not. Either way, comic being inserted in and altering the canon already has a precedent - the whole Scythe insertion happened via Fray comic in between S4 and S5 - then it popped up in S7 as legit Deus ex machina McGuffin.
 
[MENTION=9316]ladydorotea[/MENTION]

The medium ( comic, video game, novel ) is not a problem, retroactive continuity is. The scythe is completely ridiculous but its inclusion does not contradict the established plot, it's not even an example of retroactive continuity. The scene with Spike and Dru in South America from "Fool for Love" for example, just about the most blatant use of retroactive continuity on the show, does.

So why is retroactive continuity so bad? Because for some reason it almost always causes consistency issues.
 
Well, Joss has said on more than one occasion that, if canon stood in the way of what he considered an interesting story, he would ignore it and tell the story anyhow. I guess this proves that he was serious when he said it.

Course, he could always explain it as being the result of another spell of some sort like what the monks did to create Dawn, or Willow did in resurrecting Buffy, like maybe some wizard from the future is doing it in order to screw up the time continuum for some sinister reason.
 
*sigh* for character they claim to love so much, you'd think they'd invest in a better story for him. The timeline for this makes little sense.
 
Her name is Dylan and she is based on his wife (personality & looks.) Which isn't creepy at all...

That's just...unbelievably awkward and is going to just throw canon out the window and make peoples heads explode. Spike, who was apparently so completely in love with Buffy, left her in S7 ('cause let's face it, it's S7, even if JM can't line up his timeline) to hook up with some hot brunette? Spuffies are going to lose their shit.

In some ways, this is weird because Dark Horse has said nothing about this- literally, I can't find anything when searching. I would be tempted to think that it's not really going to happen except...there's the cover right there!!

I thought that, too. DH doesn't seem to be promoting it much - or, you know, at all. Which makes me wonder if it's like the early Buffy comics, set in the verse, but not canon.

Don't really see the difference between having a comic 'altering the canon after the end of the series' and the comic 'altering the canon via (supposed) insertion in the tv continuation'. Either comics are completely irrelevant to the overall canon or they are not. Either way, comic being inserted in and altering the canon already has a precedent - the whole Scythe insertion happened via Fray comic in between S4 and S5 - then it popped up in S7 as legit Deus ex machina McGuffin.

This:

[MENTION=9316]ladydorotea[/MENTION]

The medium ( comic, video game, novel ) is not a problem, retroactive continuity is. The scythe is completely ridiculous but its inclusion does not contradict the established plot, it's not even an example of retroactive continuity. The scene with Spike and Dru in South America from "Fool for Love" for example, just about the most blatant use of retroactive continuity on the show, does.

So why is retroactive continuity so bad? Because for some reason it almost always causes consistency issues.

Nothing in the comics now contradicts what happened in the show - even Fray didn't change anything. Setting a comic during the show's run changes what happened in the show and what effects it has on what's happening in the comics now. Spike leaves Buffy and hooks up with someone else? How does that not change peoples thoughts on Spike? He was supposed to be so devoted to Buffy, got a soul so that he could love her like she supposedly deserved, yet now we're finding out that, no, actually, he left her to have an affair behind her back with someone who he barely knows.

Unless it's blatantly stated that this comic isn't canon, it's going to cause some drama.

*sigh* for character they claim to love so much, you'd think they'd invest in a better story for him. The timeline for this makes little sense.

As far as the timeline is concerned, I just think JM was confused during the interview, talking about S6 when it meant S7, because nothing he talks about refers to S6.

As for the story - it's apparently James'. He came up with it and DH are greenlighting it. It was clear in S9 that no one knows what to do with Spike, but he's still a popular character and they want to cash in on that.
 
Sigh, I'm getting soooo tired of writers not knowing what to do with specific characters. It's the same thing with Angel- Joss has himself admitted that he "doesn't get" Angel. And I'm starting to think that it's true of Spike as well. Because a lot of other people have done a heckuva better job with either character (on both AtS and at IDW). I just think that with Joss, or rather with Buffy, they will always be secondary to Buffy's storyline and always the emphasis will be on their relationship with Buffy. We can argue all we want about whether it was necessary or a good idea for Spike to be in Angel season 5 (& it seems like we're doing a lot of arguing about Spike recently lol), but the fact is that the Angel/Spike chemistry is there and a lot of fun, plus AtS (& IDW) found a way to: explore their (individual & shared) pasts, allow Spike to deal with having a soul in his unique way, & have new adventures (independent of Buffy).

Sorry for the off-topic rant! 🙂
 
R
Robb Stark
[No message]
[MENTION=6332]Lyri[/MENTION]
Spuffies are going to lose their shit.

Obviously not a hard-core supporter of this relationship but I just don't see why they would. I mean, it's already been done on the show, twice, with Spike's date in "Hell's Bells" and with Anya in "Entropy". Just shows how pointless this comic appears.

Nothing in the comics now contradicts what happened in the show

Well, there was not-exactly-dead-Warren and...OK, sorry, I'm not going there, it rots the brain.

Unless it's blatantly stated that this comic isn't canon, it's going to cause some drama.

*passes popcorn*
[MENTION=10354]VisionGirl[/MENTION]
& it seems like we're doing a lot of arguing about Spike recently lol

Oh yeah. It comes and goes, there was a lot of Willow discussion few months ago. It's Spike's turn to be dissected and argued about, I guess.
 
Spike, who was apparently so completely in love with Buffy, left her in S7 ('cause let's face it, it's S7, even if JM can't line up his timeline) to hook up with some hot brunette? Spuffies are going to lose their shit.








Nothing in the comics now contradicts what happened in the show - even Fray didn't change anything.

Why should Spuffies become upset if Spike has some recreation on the side? I haven't heard many Bangels wailing about Buffy doing the same thing for a whole lot longer with Riley. I can't speak for anyone but myself, but the way I see it, if Buffy's too dumb to appreciate Spike, that doesn't mean that the entire female population of the Whedonverse has to be dumb as well.

And while nothing in the comics may contradict the televised series, something in Season 8 does change what Joss designated as canon. The final battle against Twilight was supposed to be the last great battle that blasted all of the demons out of Buffy's dimension, taking Buffy and all of her friends with them (to the Twilight universe, I suppose) That was confirmed by Joss. Buffy and her allies winning that battle created an anomaly that should have cancelled out Fray's future. So, canon has been changed at least once, if only the comic book section of it.

But I hate do overs, no matter how good the new version happens to be. It's like the new "Star Trek" movies: entertaining, but not the "real" thing. Hopefully, James and the other writers will go to the effort of coming up with something that doesn't throw the Buffyverse off into a parallel universe. workable
 
Back
Top Bottom