Interesting post...
I was reading through the pages of the topic "characters u used to hate & now u like..."
I noticed that, each character that appears on both shows, is treated better on Angel, & given the credit they deserve:
That's probobly because the characters who crossed over from
Buffy to
Angel were given more opportunity to develop - Angel, Cordy, Wesley - so therefore were made more interesting and developed.
-Angel
even though he was "the meanest vampire in all the land", he was too weak, can barely take 1 vamp
-Cordy
she was always treated like the bad side of the coin, even if she wasn't at fault
-Wesley
pretty obvious
-Faith
the B-slayer who never got credit for being a slayer, & was treated like an outsider, she was A LOT more fun & respected in Angel
Regarding Angel, pretty much everyone agrees the character had more potential then just being Buffy's love interest or the Big Bad of the week.
That's why Joss gave him his own show.
Cordy, one of the best characters in the 'verse, was completely ruined on
Angel. I'm not getting your point there.
Wesley went from a bumbling inept moron to a badass demon hunter and tortured soul, to yeah, agreed. It's pretty obvious.
-Andrew
I can't think of 1 ep in Buffy S7 that I didn't wish he'd die, in Angel S5, he was funny & not bad to watch
This is where I disagree. Andrew went though almost so character development whatsoever. He's basically a characature. He was the same in
Buffy as he was in
Angel.
-Spike
Whiny, still living his grandsire's shadow, everyone hated him & disrespected him, a soulless vampire helping a slayer isn't something easy any vampire can do, so he got his soul, yet he was boring & annoying, & never got the respect he deserved...on Angel he was treated waay better, & I liked his character more, & liked his chemistry with Angel & Illyria
Oh my, I have so many issues with this post I'm not sure where to start.
Firsty, Angel still disrespected Spike in his own show.
Not everyone disrespected him in
Buffy. Not Buffy, in the end; She loved him. Believed in him. Counted on him. And he certainly wasn't boring and annoying. Spike couldn't be boring if he tried. That's your opinion, though, so whatever. In all respect, what do you think was boring about him? I also don't think he was "treated" better on
Angel. If anything, he regressed, yet again to the "comic relief" bit and to Angel's sidekick. It's like the writers completely disregared every bit of development the character went through.
Also, um, Cordy? Her character was completely assasinated on
Angel. If anything, at least on
Buffy she had a purpose.
---------- Post added at 06:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:54 PM ----------
I see your point... I think that the reason being for this is that Angel was the "adult" show of the two. While BtVS started out in high school, "Angel" started out in the grittier, more adult world of life post-high school and it was a much darker show. I think the reason the characters were treated "better" on "Angel" was mostly because it was a more adult show and hence the characters were written as more mature.
Nice point. I think was definitely part of it.