I do agree with Primal Slayer's comments. The only reason that I responded to this thread at all is that it sort of bothered me the way that some of the posts were worded -- the speculating, "does he or doesn't he, inquiring minds want to know" type of statements. Since JM is stating in public that he does have a son, that's fine for us to know and therefore public knowledge. Do we need to know more, to delve for more details, or have the right to infringe on their privacy? IMO, of course not. JM is and should be the one who decides how much information about his private/family life is known.