The Bronze
Rogue Demon Hunter
He only joined to plug a film. He gave it a go, found it to be full of aggressive and unpleasant people so he left. It makes sense to me. I wouldn't hang around somewhere taking abuse just for the sake of it.
Honestly I don't really get people that say Joss (or any other celebrity for that matter) should be used to comments like that just because he gets em a lot. Sure, he should know how to deal with criticism. But I don't think anyone should ever learn to deal with comments such as "go kill yourself".
It's not like Joss threw a hissy fit over the comments either, literally all he did is quit a social media site. What's wrong with that, to my knowledge if you don't like something, don't do it? Even if it was because of the comments, if people are telling you to kill yourself over the internet, the simplest way to counteract this is to stop going on the internet.
But that's not entirely true. At first he did respond. He mocked some people that had problems and issues with it. Then as it progressed he posted images of himself laughing at it. Passive aggressively he did throw a hissy fit. But he was also riled and making poor comments in regards to Marvel so I think his dander was up in general.It's not like Joss threw a hissy fit over the comments either
I completely agree. That is the issue I have. To say that Bryce Dallas Howards character is "not in touch with natural physical impulses like ... reproducing" as sexist (when it itself could be viewed as sexist). Then have a line in his movie implying to choose a 'career' over a family makes you a monster just seems like hypocrisy to me. And when he gets called out on it, he mocks the people to work them into more of a frenzy.He had time to decry the "70's sexism" of just a snippet from the new Jurassic Park movie just weeks before this, but has somehow failed to see how people could be upset about the sexism in his own movie? Yeah, maybe he needs to be off Twitter and take some time to gather his thoughts and self-awareness, actually.
and then bam - backlash (that he must have foreseen, cause again, he's no fool)
What is getting me riled up is people blaming it on "militant feminists" and their reaction and comments to him "slipping up" and not showing the perfect feminist-facade.
But that's not entirely true. At first he did respond. He mocked some people that had problems and issues with it. Then as it progressed he posted images of himself laughing at it. Passive aggressively he did throw a hissy fit. But he was also riled and making poor comments in regards to Marvel so I think his dander was up in general.
I don't know... I mean, most of the hissy fit comes from everything and everyone around Joss, but he's no fool. He was well aware that he couldn't just quit and no one would take notice, and considering the timing... it's a bit of a stomp-and-cry from where I'm sitting. He joins to promote a movie, sticks around for several years while everyone is stroking his ego, and then bam - backlash (that he must have foreseen, cause again, he's no fool) - and then it's sayonara just like that. Suddenly it's too time-consuming and not fun anymore...
I get that not everyone sees it that way, and honestly, I'm not upset about this, I don't really care about Joss being on Twitter it's mostly making me roll my eyes because of the whole drama around it, but I'm not going to go "boo-hoo, poor Joss, people didn't fawn all over him" either.
That's what I think set everything off. If he would not have addressed it, or downplayed it, it would not have been as sensational. But the fact he responded, quipped, posted photos regarding the tweets, it sent out a beacon to anyone that wanted to make an impression to jump on board and rile him up. When the comments first started they weren't as malicious as the ones that made the 'headlines' that came later. When he started to delete and block users I think they starting coming on, responding just TO get blocked and deleted. Alot of them said things like "block me, I dont care" So I think alot of it he actually did bring on himself. It doesnt excuse it, but, he is not really an innocent victim either.Oh, I didn't know that. I'm really not twitter savvy as it is, I'm not even sure how it works, but that was really immature of him.
Why must he have forseen it? If he didn't think that particular movie plot-point/line was offensive/was just a joke then he would've totally been taken by surprise by all the vitriol (and yes, it was just pure vitriol as far as I can see).
But a lot of the criticism is from self-styled femininsts is it not? Of course not all the hate is- some of it is from Marvel fanboys ('you wrote my favourite character wrong, you jerk!')- but a lot of it was 'Joss the feminist is actually a woman-hater', etc.
To say otherwise is to deny what's written there on the screen.
Add to that the fact that there have always been a sub-section of feminist writers who have sneered at Joss' feminist works and critiqued the hell out of them (especially Buffy and Dollhouse) to 'prove' that Joss in some way actually dislikes/hates female characters and it starts to show a pattern- 'Joss screwed up so lets get him' seems to be the mindset.
Did Joss set himself up for a fall with the JW comment? Probably, but he still doesn't deserve this much hate for a 'capture/rescue' scene or an ill-intentioned joke.
Especially considering how he wrote the character in the first Avengers, and the growth (albeit limited) she made in The Winter Solider, to essentially regress the character to someone's worth is determined by their boyfriend/love interest.I cannot imagine that he was truly surprised by this outcome.
She volunteered to be sterilized so she could do her job and not get distracted by husband and kids. One assumption being that no husband would want her if she could not have kids. The other implying you either stay at home barefoot and pregnant like Hawkeye's ideal wife, or you have a 'profession' but not both.The message was clear enough. The people who trained her wanted her focused on killing and nothing else. To the extreme of sterilising her.
That's far from the point of feminism.That's the point of feminism isn't it. You can watch something and enjoy the characters regardless of gender.
I'm 90% sure she was forced and didn't volunteer. I can't find the script for the scene though.She volunteered to be sterilized so she could do her job and not get distracted by husband and kids.
You'd struggle to do any avenging while barefoot and pregnant. There was no mention of the scarlet witch being infertile. So it's not a requirement of avenging to never have the ability to have kids. Why does black Widow need to be compared directly to hawk eyes wife?The other implying you either stay at home barefoot and pregnant like Hawkeye's ideal wife, or you have a 'profession' but not both.
From a TV perspective surely having decent and believable characters of both sexes represents equality and therefore feminism.That's far from the point of feminism.
Not exactly the first time it has come up in a Whedon project. Just look at the worst Buffy episode ever, 'Lies My Parents Told Me'. Basically a woman who also has a job or other responsibilities outside of her child makes a worse mother than one who is fully committed to her child and nothing else.The other implying you either stay at home barefoot and pregnant like Hawkeye's ideal wife, or you have a 'profession' but not both.
Because they were in their house.. because she and Banner were in their bedroom when Banner said "I cant have this, (motioning to the bedroom, the house) any of this, kids." So their relationship is in a direct comparison to that of Hawkeye and his wife. Furthermore, the fact she was going to throw away her chosen profession so she could be the appendage of a man alludes to Hawkeye's wife staying at home and waiting for the man to do his job, come back and then take care of the house. The whole part of the scene was to compare and contrast, Banner and Natasha to Hawkeye and wife. Her job and everything she believed in for the last two movies suddenly didnt matter because she found a man. Yeah, thats a strong female character.Why does black Widow need to be compared directly to hawk eyes wife?
No it doesnt. Not at all. And your previous post "You can watch something and enjoy the characters regardless of gender." sure makes its sound like a good, feminist character is one you can watch and enjoy despite it being a woman.From a TV perspective surely having decent and believable characters of both sexes represents equality and therefore feminism.