Kristy Swanson; "It was all Luke Perry's fault"

Taake

There's a hole in the world...
Staff member
Joined
Jan 1, 2010
Messages
19,233
Age
40
Location
Stockholm, Swe
Black Thorn
... got you now didn't I? 😉

Kristy Swanson and Luke Perry talk "Buffy", apparently Perry was the reason for Swanson taking the part.

It was all Luke Perry’s fault, Kristy Swanson said.
The actress who starred in the 1992 movie Buffy the Vampire Slayer said it was her co-star who brought her into the role.


Both actors were at the Calgary Comic and Entertainment Expo this year and got to re-visit the love there still is for the movie.


“You never do know,” Swanson told the Sun of how a project that takes up months of an actor’s life will be received by audiences. “Any time you’re making your movie you always work your hardest ... and expect the worst and hope for the best. We hoped it would do well in the movie theatres. It didn’t. But the movie ended up turning into sort of a cult classic.”

Swanson was 22 when Buffy was filmed and she remembers it as being a great time in her life — beyond being physically demanding and being shot almost entirely at night it gained her life-long friendships with Perry and Paul Reubens.

Something unique for its time happened with Buffy and the course it took, Perry said.
He doesn’t figure anyone knew what would happen — failing at the box office but becoming a frequent rental at the local Blockbuster Video, and then finding yet another new life on TV screens “wasn’t the normal trajectory.”

It kind of blows his mind when people still come up to him today to talk about Buffy.

“Especially today, when the life span of stuff is so short and everything kind of comes about quickly and then it’s gone,” he said. I think it happens less and less now with movies, where people sort of claim them in that way. I feel totally flattered by it. When your work gets embraced in that way, it’s a good feeling.”

What it comes down to is the script, both said.
Swanson said the idea is a universal one — the normal teen girl wanted to be “more powerful ... wanted people to like her” and realized she had to “accept who (she is) and just roll with it.”

Perry said, “Any movie that gets watched by people time and again, it’s because they like the story ... it always comes back to the story.”


report by calgarysun;

http://www.calgarysun.com/2015/04/1...t-calgary-comic-and-entertainment-expo-friday
 
Boy these two have so much to thank the BTVS for😀

Can only think they get invited to these things just to shove it in their faces😉
 
Boy these two have so much to thank the BTVS for😀

Can only think they get invited to these things just to shove it in their faces😉

I don't know I think Luke Perry would have been fine without BtVS

And there seems to be a genuine love out there for the movie so I don't think it's being "shoved in their faces" at all. If anything we owe them and the movie a lot because without it we probably wouldn't have gotten the series.
 
But don't you think a lot of the praise for the movie are just fanboys or girls being fanboys or fangirls? Its like if you pressed them on it and they were being honest then I am sure most of them will conceed that it was pretty awful. Its just its a fan thing, because its part of the Buffy universe they just don't want to say anything bad about it.

Luke Perry was fine for awhile because of the 90210 gig, and he was in a couple of decent films too. I just mean now in someways the legency of the Buffy show is keeping him Swanson a float (see what I did there SWANson? a float?😀) because they just happened to be in the film which started it all.
 
I don't know actually.
I mean I saw the movie first so I'm very fond of the film independently of the show. It's campy and fun, it doesn't come close to the emotional pathos of the show of course, but if there had never been a series I would still have liked the movie and I'm sure it would still have been a bit of a cult classic, if not as known... I'm sure plenty of people feel similarly.
 
It's campy and fun, it doesn't come close to the emotional pathos of the show of course
And that is why it's appealing. It's a fun 90's flick that did a better job at poking fun of the stereotypes than the show did. It is just as good as the series- and in some ways it's better.
 
And that is why it's appealing. It's a fun 90's flick that did a better job at poking fun of the stereotypes than the show did. It is just as good as the series- and in some ways it's better.

"You threw a knife AT.MY.HEAD"
"Yes and you caught it."
"You threw a knife at my head."


Always loved that exchange...

Not sure I'd say it was better, there are too many cringeworthy performances for me (including Buffy's PMS cramps whenever a vamp is near, subtlety was not their thing, but mostly it's Hauer and Sutherland that are just obviously too good to be there...), but it's still very enjoyable and fun to watch.
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
On the plus side, I now know what I will watch tonight!
Always loved that exchange...
I liked the mole line.

Not sure I'd say it was better
I didnt say it was better.. aspects of it were. It was just more biting satirical than the show. And I think the movie did the 'mean girls' bits so much better than the TV show. The Cordettes or whatever were just a pale comparison. And the whole Buffy's mum time bit. It was Clueless with vampires.
 
And I think the movie did the 'mean girls' bits so much better than the TV show. The Cordettes or whatever were just a pale comparison. And the whole Buffy's mum time bit. It was Clueless with vampires.

Haha true, maybe that's why I liked it so much 😀
 
And that is why it's appealing. It's a fun 90's flick that did a better job at poking fun of the stereotypes than the show did. It is just as good as the series- and in some ways it's better.

Its not poking fun at anything that is problem. Its a striaght up comedy, and the gags arn't sharp enough, the lead is weak and it is neither scary or inventive. You really do have a downer on Whedon don't you?😱
 
Its not poking fun at anything that is problem.

Haha, we don't watch the same movie clearly 🙂

It pokes fun at Buffy's parents, or their type
It pokes fun at the mean girls
It pokes fun at the stoner dudes (or whatever you should call Perry and Arquette)
It pokes fun at vampires
It pokes fun at dramatic death scenes
It pokes fun at sacred mystical powers (i.e. Buffy's entire being and attitude towards her role. Swanson is a better valley girl than SMG, but that might be due to different directions and intentions, to be fair)
 
Haha, we don't watch the same movie clearly 🙂

It pokes fun at Buffy's parents, or their type
It pokes fun at the mean girls
It pokes fun at the stoner dudes (or whatever you should call Perry and Arquette)
It pokes fun at vampires
It pokes fun at dramatic death scenes
It pokes fun at sacred mystical powers (i.e. Buffy's entire being and attitude towards her role. Swanson is a better valley girl than SMG, but that might be due to different directions and intentions, to be fair)

I guess maybe its about context. I can see see how maybe doing that sort of thing with Vampires then was quite original. But a lot of the other gags were done much better later in films like Clueless and Mean Girls, or even before Buffy the movie Heathers did it in the 80s. So the post-modern high school stuff wasn't actually that new, and was done much better later on.

Another thing about the film is that it just never makes its mind up weather it wants to be an ironic comedy or an action film, and just ends up being an unbalanced mix of the two.

I accept that maybe it isn't as bad as I am making out, and like I said before if the show had never happened then maybe I would look at the film more kindly, but I still think its a pretty bad film even considering that.
 
Another thing about the film is that it just never makes its mind up weather it wants to be an ironic comedy or an action film, and just ends up being an unbalanced mix of the two.
.

I do think it had a problem in direction/production of what the tone was going to be and that that shines through in the end product.

I just take it as it is, I guess, i.e. just as a good, not very serious, time. 🙂
 
Back
Top Bottom