Gum Gnome33
"Well, yeah..."
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,148
Ok. So I've entered into this epic debate about Anya over in the anti-Spike thread. While in there, standing strong and defending everyone's favorite vampire with a soul, (wink) Anya's soul came into discussion.
For me, it was always clear that when the demon inside Anya and the powers that went along with it were stripped away, she became the (not so proud) new owner of a soul. I never even questioned this until Taaroko and Icarium brought up some really interesting points to the contrary. Prophecygrrl remembered that D'Hoffryn made the statement "the life and soul of a demon" in "Selfless" so I had to backpeddal a tiny bit and modify my view to accommodate that fact. I now believe that Anya, (and all vengeance demons), possesses what is not a human soul while they are demons, but something else entirely. I'll refer to it as a "demon soul," but what I mean to suggest is that it is simply an altered moral compass from what we humans have. I'll try to explain what I mean here. (I'm sorry if this becomes an essay--but I"m really looking forward to hearing peoples' thoughts on this!)
So she starts out as Aud. A callous, strangely literal human with a vengeful spirit. Her man does her wrong, and she turns him into a troll. She doesn't show much remorse and she doesn't seem to care all that much that the townspeople are running in fear of the monster she's created. In short, she isn't really the nicest of all people. But she's a human nevertheless. Then D'Hoffryn makes her a demon. Now her moral compass places a priority on killing for the sake of vengeance--the more gruesome the better. Her new morality says that gruesome vengeance is "right" and anything other than that is "wrong." When she is newly human, (as she describes herself), from season 3 on, she no longer commits acts of vengeance. So something changed. For 1100 years she killed for "justice" and suddenly she stops? Sure, she doesn't have powers any more but why would that stop her from murdering if her internal moral compass was exactly the same as it was when she was Anyanka? You don't need magic and powers to kill.
It was pointed out to me that she doesn't kill as a new human because without powers it is simply too risky. My response to this is that a creature who values death for justice as highly as (a now human) Anya, would probably be willing to face the consequences of killing because, again, according to their codes of morality, it is worse not to commit acts of vengeance than it is to be caught doing so. Not all creatures in Sunnydale have such a strong "cause" to kill for; vamps do it mostly for pleasure. Demons like Anyanka who believe they're justified in killing are much more likely to go for it. And they have this powerful demon who will stand behind them when they do, (D'Hoffryn). This very fact suggests a shift in morality to me.
It was also pointed out to me that Anya likes to boast about her former "glory" days as a demon, implying that her morality hasn't changed. I think this is a great point, but I argue that her anecdotes about the old days are her way of reminding everyone how powerful she used to be. In a warped sense, she's proud of what she did--not the murders themselves at this point (though she's awfully callous about them of course), but the power she had. Buffy and Willow have so much power and she doesn't after 1100 years of having it. Anya is a very jealous person who likes to be the center of attention. So she likes to remind people that she used to be able to eviscerate men with her thoughts alone. But because she doesn't actually harm a fly or try after Doppelgangland to get her powers back again in order to facilitate the killing, I think that what's inside of her has changed from a moral standpoint. In other words, she's all talk.
Now there's the issue of love. From her anecdotes it seems clear that Xander is the first person she truly loves in over a thousand years. It's no coincidence that she is human, (with a human soul) when this happens. If her soul had been exactly as it had when she was a demon, what then was the reason she could suddenly feel this way? In early season 4 she says to Xander "When I think that something bad could happen to you it feels bad inside, " (or something like that). This sounds to me like someone who is for the first time grasping the concept of truly caring for another person.
Time for the episode "Selfless." I think that when Anyanka pleads for her deed to be undone, she is drawing on her memories of empathy which are sparked by seeing Xander walk into the room and try to save her. I know it's a leap of faith, but truly it isn't until she sees him that she is remorseful enough to beg for it to be taken back at the cost of her own life. The argument here, (and this is where I draw a parallel to Spike), is that a creature either without a soul or with a different kind of soul from that of a human, (in Anya's case) can remember empathy or (in Spike's case) enter into a quasi empathetic state if triggered by love. This is fiction after all, and I believe that it is what's being portrayed. It's no coincidence that Anyanka doesn't beg for her deed to be undone until Xander enters the room. Nor is it a coincidence that Spike realizes that he'll never get rid of the monster inside until he hurts the woman he loves.
Perhaps my strongest argument concerning the newfound human soul in Anya comes from that well-loved monologue in The Body. She is for the first time beginning to understand what death means. How final it is. How it affects so profoundly the people close to the deceased. Over a thousand years of killing and she just begins to consider all of this now? I smell a change in morality.
Ok I'm stepping off the soapbox for now. What do you think??
For me, it was always clear that when the demon inside Anya and the powers that went along with it were stripped away, she became the (not so proud) new owner of a soul. I never even questioned this until Taaroko and Icarium brought up some really interesting points to the contrary. Prophecygrrl remembered that D'Hoffryn made the statement "the life and soul of a demon" in "Selfless" so I had to backpeddal a tiny bit and modify my view to accommodate that fact. I now believe that Anya, (and all vengeance demons), possesses what is not a human soul while they are demons, but something else entirely. I'll refer to it as a "demon soul," but what I mean to suggest is that it is simply an altered moral compass from what we humans have. I'll try to explain what I mean here. (I'm sorry if this becomes an essay--but I"m really looking forward to hearing peoples' thoughts on this!)
So she starts out as Aud. A callous, strangely literal human with a vengeful spirit. Her man does her wrong, and she turns him into a troll. She doesn't show much remorse and she doesn't seem to care all that much that the townspeople are running in fear of the monster she's created. In short, she isn't really the nicest of all people. But she's a human nevertheless. Then D'Hoffryn makes her a demon. Now her moral compass places a priority on killing for the sake of vengeance--the more gruesome the better. Her new morality says that gruesome vengeance is "right" and anything other than that is "wrong." When she is newly human, (as she describes herself), from season 3 on, she no longer commits acts of vengeance. So something changed. For 1100 years she killed for "justice" and suddenly she stops? Sure, she doesn't have powers any more but why would that stop her from murdering if her internal moral compass was exactly the same as it was when she was Anyanka? You don't need magic and powers to kill.
It was pointed out to me that she doesn't kill as a new human because without powers it is simply too risky. My response to this is that a creature who values death for justice as highly as (a now human) Anya, would probably be willing to face the consequences of killing because, again, according to their codes of morality, it is worse not to commit acts of vengeance than it is to be caught doing so. Not all creatures in Sunnydale have such a strong "cause" to kill for; vamps do it mostly for pleasure. Demons like Anyanka who believe they're justified in killing are much more likely to go for it. And they have this powerful demon who will stand behind them when they do, (D'Hoffryn). This very fact suggests a shift in morality to me.
It was also pointed out to me that Anya likes to boast about her former "glory" days as a demon, implying that her morality hasn't changed. I think this is a great point, but I argue that her anecdotes about the old days are her way of reminding everyone how powerful she used to be. In a warped sense, she's proud of what she did--not the murders themselves at this point (though she's awfully callous about them of course), but the power she had. Buffy and Willow have so much power and she doesn't after 1100 years of having it. Anya is a very jealous person who likes to be the center of attention. So she likes to remind people that she used to be able to eviscerate men with her thoughts alone. But because she doesn't actually harm a fly or try after Doppelgangland to get her powers back again in order to facilitate the killing, I think that what's inside of her has changed from a moral standpoint. In other words, she's all talk.
Now there's the issue of love. From her anecdotes it seems clear that Xander is the first person she truly loves in over a thousand years. It's no coincidence that she is human, (with a human soul) when this happens. If her soul had been exactly as it had when she was a demon, what then was the reason she could suddenly feel this way? In early season 4 she says to Xander "When I think that something bad could happen to you it feels bad inside, " (or something like that). This sounds to me like someone who is for the first time grasping the concept of truly caring for another person.
Time for the episode "Selfless." I think that when Anyanka pleads for her deed to be undone, she is drawing on her memories of empathy which are sparked by seeing Xander walk into the room and try to save her. I know it's a leap of faith, but truly it isn't until she sees him that she is remorseful enough to beg for it to be taken back at the cost of her own life. The argument here, (and this is where I draw a parallel to Spike), is that a creature either without a soul or with a different kind of soul from that of a human, (in Anya's case) can remember empathy or (in Spike's case) enter into a quasi empathetic state if triggered by love. This is fiction after all, and I believe that it is what's being portrayed. It's no coincidence that Anyanka doesn't beg for her deed to be undone until Xander enters the room. Nor is it a coincidence that Spike realizes that he'll never get rid of the monster inside until he hurts the woman he loves.
Perhaps my strongest argument concerning the newfound human soul in Anya comes from that well-loved monologue in The Body. She is for the first time beginning to understand what death means. How final it is. How it affects so profoundly the people close to the deceased. Over a thousand years of killing and she just begins to consider all of this now? I smell a change in morality.
Ok I'm stepping off the soapbox for now. What do you think??