Joss has won and been nominated for quite a few awards, including the Ray Bradbury award, Nebula awards, Annie awards, Academy of Science Fiction, Saturn Awards, quite a few Oscars, and most recently, the 2009 Lifetime Achievement award honoring his work with Equality Now. That's nothing to sneeze at, as my mother would say.
---------- Post added at 01:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 PM ----------
They're not unsupported comments. I can understand why she didn't want to focus on generic figures, but I read her essay and I didn't see the link between Joss Whedon's work and comments and being a human rights 'hero'. He's gone a short way towards legitimizing the portrayal of a strong woman in popular culture, but that's been done before too. I'm not trying to play Devil's Advocate or imply that Joss Whedon's efforts are entirely useless, but I'm baffled as to how anyone could see him as a human rights hero on the basis of 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' any more than they would, say, Ridley Scott for 'Alien'.
I don't think that people think of him as a human rights hero because of his work on
Buffy. I think people refer to him as that due to his work with Equality Now and also to a lesser extent, his intention of creating Buffy to be a feminist icon.
Also, DrusillaRox mentioned that he was
her hero. There is a difference there. Anyone has the right to name anyone their hero, it is not your decision to deside who is worthy of being anyone's hero.
😉 A culture hero is defined as someone whom changes the culture he or she is a part of by creating something unique. Well, it's for you deside if you think Joss' work has made enough of an impact to effect the world of pop culture - but regardless of your stance, my point is that anyone can claim that anyone is a hero - what does it matter, anyway? After all, heroes create things or do things for the benefit of others, and Buffy benefits us, it makes us happy, it entertains us, it teaches us and soothes us. Agreed?
I'm yaking. Gotta get back to rehearsal.