New Joss Whedon Biography

Buffy Summers

Yataro
Staff member
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
35,079
Location
The City of Angels
Sineya
Everything you wanted to know about Joss Whedon -- and more -- in new bio

By C.A. Bridges

For the casual fan of the writer-director, "Joss Whedon -- The Biography" by Amy Pascale may be overkill. Sure, you liked "The Avengers," but do you really need to know what pen Whedon prefers?


Enlarge
For the fans who happily follow him from project to project because they've seen their lives changed because of something he wrote, the answer may be yes, absolutely.

But even casual readers will enjoy Pascale's look at the life of the man behind "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," "Angel," "Firefly," "Dollhouse," "Doctor Horrible's Sing-Along Blog," "The Avengers," "Cabin in the Woods," "Much Ado About Nothing" and more, and his gift for taking cliched genre formats and subverting them to tell meaningful stories about love, death, family, and redemption with humor and chilling drama, often in the same scene.

Whedon's father was a second-generation TV writer who wrote for "The Dick Cavett Show" and "The Electric Company" and his mother was a performer and teacher who created feminist course studies and held Shakespeare readings in the home. Humor and artistic expression were baked into him at an early age. Yet as Pascale explains, the driving force behind everything he did was loneliness and a hatred for bullying.

"If Joss Whedon had had one good day in high school," according to Buffy executive producer and Angel co-creator David Greenwalt, "we wouldn't be here."

From exhaustive research and multiple interviews with Whedon, his wife Kai, and their friends and coworkers, Pascale provides a thorough look at Whedon's life from his ancestry and childhood to his time in boarding school in England and his influences in the film department of Wesleyan University, to his early struggles in writing for the screen. Whedon experienced failures and disappointments aplenty starting out. He landed his dream job, writing for "Roseanne," but the behind-the-scenes madness ultimately led to his departure. He watched a director turn his script for "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" into a campy movie played solely for laughs, with star Donald Sutherland changing lines on a whim, and he left the production. He rewrote virtually all of the dialogue and changed the tone that arguably made "Speed" a smash hit but didn't get screen credit. His work on "Waterworld" and "Aliens: Resurrection" was wasted or mangled.

But his work on "Toy Story" helped Pixar refine its now-famous style and brought Whedon an Oscar nomination. When he was offered "Buffy" as a TV show he got to do it the way he wanted this time and he saw his version become a beloved TV icon and cult favorite that ran for seven years and birthed a spinoff, "Angel." Making a story meaningful was the key, and every story had to be about something real, even if it was told through the metaphors of vampires and demons and students who become invisible. That was the key to avoiding monster-of-the-week episodes and making his shows touch people, he thought.

"I'd rather make a show a hundred people need to see than a show a thousand people want to see," Whedon said, and he's done it time and time again. "Buffy" and "Angel" and "Firefly," even the less-well-received "Dollhouse" has devoted fans talking about the episodes and dressing up like the characters and writing their own fanfiction.

While his science-fiction western "Firefly" was mishandled by the network and canceled early, Joss' continuing interest in it led to a "Serenity" movie. When that fell short at the box office he worked on more movies and then award-winning comics such as "The Astonishing X-Men," "Fray," "Runaways" and a new, official "Buffy" comic. When the writers' strike interrupted his plans to write a horror movie with Drew Goddard ("Cabin in the Woods") it gave him the push to develop his own work outside of the studios, which led to the Emmy-winning "Doctor Horrible's Sing-Along Blog."

And then Marvel Studios came calling.

While Pascale drifts into Whedon-worship at times, she doesn't shy away from his darker sides and missteps. She talks to Charisma Carpenter about the ignominious way the actress was let go from "Angel," for example, and the stresses that arose when Whedon was running "Buffy," "Angel" and "Firefly" at the same time.

But mostly this is a lengthy and entertaining exploration and celebration of a brilliant, prolific man with just the right balance of humor, insight, humility and arrogance to create art that will go on affecting people for generations.

With Pilot Rzor Point pens.

"Joss Whedon -- The Biography" by Amy Pascale. 448 pages, Chicago Review Press. Hardcover $29.95. Ebook $11.99.


Source: News Journal Online
 
Cool! Though honestly I probably won't read it, I've read one so while I'm sure there would be some factoids I haven't already read, my reading list just doesn't prioritize biographies these days 🙂
 
I don't normally read biographies but God himself couldn't stop me from reading this!
 
I know that a lot of people are going to disagree with me here, but I just think that it's way too early for any sort of really meaningful biography of Joss Whedon to be published. It's not really a waste of time at this point, but it's certainly an incomplete work, more like someone is trying to cash in on his celebrity status before he gets the chance to really screw up. The man has, hopefully, a long career still ahead of him, and a book length biography at this point to me just seems like showing Act 1 of a play, then saying, "Come back in a few years for Act 2. Act 3 will be delayed for ANOTHER 5 years. We haven't decided about an Act 4 yet."

To me, an autobiography can, and should be, a "My life up to this point, and my goals for the future." That's the character himself telling his own story, and it is by necessity an incomplete one. A biography, on the other hand, is the summation of someone's life, the good, the bad, the mediocre, beginning, middle, and end, possibly with a commentary by the author giving his impression of that complete life and the mark that it has left on those who remember him. Otherwise, it's only telling part of what it should, a drama ending in a cliffhanger.

And I absolutely HATE cliffhangers.
 
FaithsFollower
FaithsFollower
You know, that makes a lot of sense. :)
I know that a lot of people are going to disagree with me here, but I just think that it's way too early for any sort of really meaningful biography of Joss Whedon to be published. It's not really a waste of time at this point, but it's certainly an incomplete work, more like someone is trying to cash in on his celebrity status before he gets the chance to really screw up. The man has, hopefully, a long career still ahead of him, and a book length biography at this point to me just seems like showing Act 1 of a play, then saying, "Come back in a few years for Act 2. Act 3 will be delayed for ANOTHER 5 years. We haven't decided about an Act 4 yet."

To me, an autobiography can, and should be, a "My life up to this point, and my goals for the future." That's the character himself telling his own story, and it is by necessity an incomplete one. A biography, on the other hand, is the summation of someone's life, the good, the bad, the mediocre, beginning, middle, and end, possibly with a commentary by the author giving his impression of that complete life and the mark that it has left on those who remember him. Otherwise, it's only telling part of what it should, a drama ending in a cliffhanger.

And I absolutely HATE cliffhangers.

You're right but that is how biographers do things these days. It's annoying but it's just one of those things.
 
I know that a lot of people are going to disagree with me here, but I just think that it's way too early for any sort of really meaningful biography of Joss Whedon to be published. It's not really a waste of time at this point, but it's certainly an incomplete work, more like someone is trying to cash in on his celebrity status before he gets the chance to really screw up. The man has, hopefully, a long career still ahead of him, and a book length biography at this point to me just seems like showing Act 1 of a play, then saying, "Come back in a few years for Act 2. Act 3 will be delayed for ANOTHER 5 years. We haven't decided about an Act 4 yet."

To me, an autobiography can, and should be, a "My life up to this point, and my goals for the future." That's the character himself telling his own story, and it is by necessity an incomplete one. A biography, on the other hand, is the summation of someone's life, the good, the bad, the mediocre, beginning, middle, and end, possibly with a commentary by the author giving his impression of that complete life and the mark that it has left on those who remember him. Otherwise, it's only telling part of what it should, a drama ending in a cliffhanger.

And I absolutely HATE cliffhangers.

I disagee, too much information has been lost about authors because people have waited until they're dead, what's the harm in doing one every few years while they're alive, it just means future generation have more accurate, closer to the source, material than we do on people like Virginia Woolf, Nietszche, Sartre etc.

The more material generated the better in my opinion, time will decide if they are good enough, so there's no harm in their existence.
 
I disagee, too much information has been lost about authors because people have waited until they're dead, what's the harm in doing one every few years while they're alive, it just means future generation have more accurate, closer to the source, material than we do on people like Virginia Woolf, Nietszche, Sartre etc.

The more material generated the better in my opinion, time will decide if they are good enough, so there's no harm in their existence.

Yeah, although Joss is a flavour of the month at the moment, he does have a substantive body of work behind him to warrent some kind of bio, I say what the hell, go for it. Make this volume 1 of his epic career, more to follow.

What gets me is the cash-ins from non-celebrities in their twenties who release an autobiography when they have done nothing to warrent it except be famous at that moment, and you know they're going to disappear into obscurity in a year or so.
 
Yeah, although Joss is a flavour of the month at the moment, he does have a substantive body of work behind him to warrent some kind of bio, I say what the hell, go for it. Make this volume 1 of his epic career, more to follow.

What gets me is the cash-ins from non-celebrities in their twenties who release an autobiography when they have done nothing to warrent it except be famous at that moment, and you know they're going to disappear into obscurity in a year or so.

Absolutely, I'm getting flash backs of Preston's appearance on Never Mind the Buzzcocks 🙂
 
I'm used to the late in life biography but that tradition is changing - perhaps the writer could have gone with a description more like an exploration of Joss Whedon and his work. This would have given wide latitude for bio info and studies of his work as well as those interviews.

It's great that it is being offered both a hard copy and digital. I plan to purchase it.
 
I'm about a quarter of the way through it and I have to say it is a fantastic read. I don't really read too many of these kind of books. To be honest the only others I have read are Rafael Nadal, Andre Agassi and Jackie Chan.

It has been a while since I have sat down and watched Buffy and Angel (Firefly and Serenity are on a constant loop) and it has made me want to sit down and start again. One thing I love about it is that it goes into the community angle. Time is spent looking at how Buffy really capatalised on internet fandom which was a very new thing when it started. Joss himself seemed to get a lot of strength and support from reading the communities and connecting with the fans.

I very much recommend giving it a read.
 
Have any of you read Joss Whedon: The genius behind Buffy by Candace Havens - because I read that one years ago which is why I felt like this one wouldn't be for me (figured it would be more or less a reiteration of that one) - but if someone has read both and can compare I would be interested to hear if the new one is still worth a read. 🙂
 
I've not read that but i'll have a look out. To be honest I only found out about Joss's new book was because the news outlets picked up on the whole Tom Hiddleston letter thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom