I think Occupy Wall Street would work way better if the people there actually agreed on (or even knew) what it is they WANT. Everyone seems to be unhappy, sure, but if you're not bringing some sort of solution to the table, it's hard to negotiate with you. Since I'm assuming they don't want to shut down Wall Street forever, they must eventually negotiate. What do they want? More government control of banks? Or do they want congress to quit pouring more money into an industry that clearly has enough money already? Do they want the CEO's fired? Arrested? Who'd be put in power next, and who's to say they're not as bad? Do they want the big banks gone, or do they want them to stabilize?
Different people will give different answers, which is a problem. They all seem pretty keen on wanting legislation of some sort passed (as if congress was any more trustworthy than the banks), but they can't agree on what. So yeah, it's great that they're getting a say in where they're money is going - I just wished they used they're power-in-numbers towards a good, or at least coherent, goal.