eponinethen
Majk
Lorne The Host said:This is the problem I've encountered with the board, and actually with the entire world. I say A, you read half of A and assume B is what I said.
I didn't say you have to believe in anything illogical to be religious. I'm not criticizing people who take everything literally. To understand what I said, you would've had to read the two posts above it in order to get the context which you obviously didn't.
I said the idea of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, omniscient god is illogical. Why? Because it contains a contradiction. It's a paradox. It's inherently flawed. Incomplete. Do I need to go on?
I'm open to criticism. Hell, I'm open to downright attacks against my points. I'm open to all opinions which differ with mine, but if you want to voice yours, at least have the decency of truly reading what I write here.
I actually did read everything you wrote. Maybe you misunderstand me, I'm not great at expressing my thoughts in English.. I'm not even trying to criticise you (although it seem like you want me to), I just think this is an interesting thing to talk about..
But it's not like that is all you said, the thing about an omnipotent god. You also wrote "I consider religious institutions medieval relics and find them to be one of the evils of the world. Religion on the other hand, while one is taught to respect all of them, I find absurd." That doesn't really sound like "I respect all religions and the people that have faith in them." But okay, I understood you wrong..? You don't think that there's anything illogical about god or religions?