Rorschach Test

Ah, so ME (the insane one), I said "I see..Black and white shapes.." So what, I'm SANE??
Pfft! you cheated of course. When you were pillaging around me head the other night you peeked at the answers. I know I should have encrypted my memory.

There Ain't No Sanity Clause spoons!

Spoons! you are supposed to be a Damned fan??? you must know that song
 
1. Insect priest
2. The head of a dog, who is also a Chinese sage.
3. Fox head

This is fun... maybe someone should post some more... or start a Rorschach test in the Slaying Practive forum.
 
Same with the Rorschach test; shrink says, what does this look like to you? In an attempt to prove you are not crazy you answer, yet the only valid answer is various ink blots!
So all of those not answering wasn´t smart/sane, just lazy?
 
But shouldn't imagination be encouraged in some ways? Shouldn't people be able to look at something and see whatever they want. Isn't that how great art is created?
 
So all of those not answering wasn´t smart/sane, just lazy?
No, they just figured no sense in trying to prove their sanity, as we all know they are not sane, and skipped the whole thing.
[br][/br]
Edit:
[br][/br]
But shouldn't imagination be encouraged in some ways? Shouldn't people be able to look at something and see whatever they want. Isn't that how great art is created?
Indeed, yet those are not meant to be viewed as art, and what you 'see' speaks as to what your neurosis is.
 
I can scratch that itch... I believe the rorschach to be a flawed method. As a person grows, the experiences they learn and take with them alter the natural perception of things. For instance, I may have fond memories or riding a horse and think upon a horse with wonder, whereas, you have memories of being thrown off, etc

So when the Rorschach shows an image and your answer of horse, versus my answer of horse would have two different meanings. Granted, this is an overly simplified example, but I think you can see my point and where I am going.

Thoughts, and responses do not live in a vacuum, they are not static, yet I feel the Rorschach treats it as such with a stock questions. Granted, I am not a psychologist, so maybe I am missing the finer points.

Do they do something? Yes. I believe they can, and maybe more often than we would like to know, misdiagnose people.

But that's just my opinion.. I could be wrong.
 
I feel the same way about dream analysis. No one ever really has a pure thought about things because the experiences that we go through change how we see things. But you put things into words much better then I do!
 
1. a "priest of good" and a "priest of evil", mirrored on a playing-card-like arrangement
2. a bomber airplane devastating countryside
3. a wolf's head
 
[hilarious film reference] "I see dead people"[/hilarious film reference] 😉
 
[hilarious film reference] "I see dead people"[/hilarious film reference] 😉
[more obscure film reference] "I see... bloood!" [/more obscure film reference]

now if anyone can name the film that was from, I will give you some major kudos. It was a comedy.
 
Indeed, yet those are not meant to be viewed as art, and what you 'see' speaks as to what your neurosis is.

God, now I'm worried. I'd like to retract my previous statement, even though it was never stated, merely implied..ok I'm retracting the implied and replacing it with bunnies. I'm neurotic about bunnies. In fact, that was my previous statement, I just didn't want people to look down on me for seein' bunnies everywhere.
 
Back
Top Bottom