Sandy Hook Law Suit

Some of us like guns, some of us don't, some have no clear opinion and we might think different about gun laws. Still it seems to me that we agree that this lawsuit is misguided.

I wondering though, since it seems many consider America to be "special". Should the rest of the world change their view on guns and gun laws as to how you want it to be in America? Or is it the thing that make it "special" something that would make it a bad idea in other countries? Why or why not?

I am in no way trying to sound condescending when I say this, but, to use a simile we can all recognize, suddenly giving people the kind of access to guns that we have in the United States would be just as imprudent, and potentially disastrous, as Buffy was when she activated all of the Potentials in the world with no warning of what was about to happen, or guidance in how, when, and why to use the powers that they suddenly possessed. I'm in no way saying that every American, or even every gun owner, is responsible and mature enough to handle the responsibility that comes with gun ownership, because, obviously, they aren't, but the vast majority of gun owners are. They grew up with guns, have been properly trained in their safe handling, and are aware and respectful of the laws concerning their ownership. To the best of my knowledge, no other country in the world has those conditions. Without training, supervision, and guidance, there would simply be too great a risk.


what do you think would happen if other countries were to lower their regulations?

If proper training were provided, including facilities where potential gun owners could come and familiarize themselves with the proper safe handling, care, and use of their guns, I think that it would work out pretty well the majority of the time, though, obviously, there would be some exceptions.
 
Washburne
Washburne
I didn't take it as condescending.
There is a difference in killing and committing murder. A hunter kills game, a home owner kills an attacker in self defense. Neither of those are crimes. .

This makes me laugh. There was a case a little while ago in Australia where a guy killed an intruder (who was in his three year old daughter's bedroom). The guy put the intruder in a headlock and killed him (whether or not he meant to, I'm not sure)
Anyways, he's being charged with murder. Our laws are a joke.
Murder case may test limits of self-defence | The New Daily
 
This makes me laugh. There was a case a little while ago in Australia where a guy killed an intruder (who was in his three year old daughter's bedroom). The guy put the intruder in a headlock and killed him (whether or not he meant to, I'm not sure)
Anyways, he's being charged with murder. Our laws are a joke.
Murder case may test limits of self-defense | The New Daily

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm only going on what little we've been reading here in the U S, but is it true that that, basically, you have to have a valid reason to buy or own a gun (here, the government has to have a valid reason to deny you buying one) and that "self defense" is not considered a valid reason?
 
Yep, that's correct.
Usually if you're a farmer or belong to a rifle club is about the only way you can get a gun (That I'm aware of)
 
white avenger
white avenger
You have my deepest sympathy, my friend.
Back
Top Bottom