Sarah ready to peel off for the right project?

Don´t get me wrong guys. I can watch or discuss Sarah´s body all day long if I have to. But 1) No way do I think that´s her body in the first pic, 2) What was the meaning of the pic in the first place? We couldn´t discusss the topic without it? Better to start off a appreciation thread for SMG in all instead if the mods will allow it. Why not for many of the actors? We´ve seen most of them half nude in the show anyway. And guys seem to be fine to show off here anyway. I mean it´s not like many of them (Charisma being the excpetion that I can think of now) have been totally nude.

But back to the topic. If Sarah decides to do nude scenes it´s up to her. Not that I´ll be sad if she does but it´s not like I´m gonna cry myself to sleep if she doesn´t. The same goes for Eliza which I think has been discussed in another thread. Aren´t people allowed to change their mind? Because god knows none of us have after a certain age.
 
Veyron
Veyron
Ms Carpenter did a nude photo shoot for Playboy or some such mens magazine a while back.
Kean
Kean
The photoshopedness of the Maxim pics...I don't think her boobs look too big in any of those pics
I mean it´s not like many of them (Charisma being the excpetion that I can think of now) have been totally nude.

Charisma, Mercedes McNab, Alexa Davalos. Eliza Dushku partially.

Eh, not that I'm keeping track.
 
Washburne
Washburne
Ok, I don´t like the look of MM, don´t check up on AD (which I should :P) and Eliza have? Where? (sw). Seems I got proof that I don´t keep track.
Cohen
Cohen
oh, don't be bashful of your sexual lustfulness. they're all H-O-T.
as far as the so called fake image. I think its her, its just ridiculously photoshoped. If you look at the photo she's not that busty, her curves are just enhanced in PS. I love SMG's hands so i can tell them quite easily and they are hers.

64610_sarah-michelle-gellar-713097_123_425lo.jpg
 
PS. I love SMG's hands so i can tell them quite easily and they are hers.

Why her, ahem, hands? I like hands, no calluses though, you know, from holding a stake all the time..
 
Don´t get me wrong guys. I can watch or discuss Sarah´s body all day long if I have to. But 1) No way do I think that´s her body in the first pic, 2) What was the meaning of the pic in the first place? We couldn´t discusss the topic without it? Better to start off a appreciation thread for SMG in all instead if the mods will allow it. Why not for many of the actors? We´ve seen most of them half nude in the show anyway. And guys seem to be fine to show off here anyway. I mean it´s not like many of them (Charisma being the excpetion that I can think of now) have been totally nude.

But back to the topic. If Sarah decides to do nude scenes it´s up to her. Not that I´ll be sad if she does but it´s not like I´m gonna cry myself to sleep if she doesn´t. The same goes for Eliza which I think has been discussed in another thread. Aren´t people allowed to change their mind? Because god knows none of us have after a certain age.

Doh - you'll have to forgive me for my karmic addon - I misread the line about Charisma.. I thought you meant she hadn't done any nude work.. my mistook... 🙁
 
Yeah, seriously, that is one badly made photo. I mean her head looks tiny on that body! And that body is of someone a lot taller than Sarah. Plus as mentioned before, the headshot is from a publicity pic for Buffy. :tongue:
 
Ok, soo, the picture is an old picture of her face, photoshopped onto another persons body? I feel robbed.
 
What makes you think that that's not her? It certainly doesn't look photoshopped to me (well apart from a dark line along the inside of her collar).


Sarah's boobs are so not that big and her head is from photos of Buffy. You can tell from the style of her hair.
 
Yeah, seriously, that is one badly made photo. I mean her head looks tiny on that body! And that body is of someone a lot taller than Sarah. Plus as mentioned before, the headshot is from a publicity pic for Buffy. :tongue:
ok show us! It just looks like a really overlly PS image to me and yes, it looks pretty bad. Ive seen lots of similar images.
[br][/br]
Edit:
[br][/br]
Sarah's boobs are so not that big and her head is from photos of Buffy. You can tell from the style of her hair.
Compare these two photos and the level of photoshop, PS means you can enhance the curve, she still hasnt got big boobs in that shot

Sarah-Michelle-Gellar-0203.JPG


Sarah Michelle Gellar - Kz2 260-.Jpg


but heres another busy shot of her...

Sarah Michelle Gellar - In Pink.Jpg



sooooory 56k

btw, none are very flattering and dont make her look too good.
 
Kean
Kean
That last shot is her head on another body
ok show us! It just looks like a really overlly PS image to me and yes, it looks pretty bad. Ive seen lots of similar images.

This is the original headshot

normal_sarah-s4-014.jpg


And this is the bad fake

64610_sarah-michelle-gellar-713097_.jpg
 
Washburne
Washburne
Crushing peoples dreams. They´re gonna be pissed. ;)
E
Edmund Blackadder
I said on page 1 that the head was from a season 2/3 promotional - I never get the credit when it is due:(
ILLYRIAN
ILLYRIAN
So it's a fake.....ummm who's body is it? and details please!
Apart from the small shadow under her chin I wouldn't have noticed that the 3rd pic was photoshopped and probably wouldn't have given it a second glance, especially if the picture had of been a whole lot smaller.

Edit:

Bluebird: Ah well... it was good while the dream lasted 😉

Just a shame that the latter picture isn't real... 🙁
 
It could be veeeery much photoshop.. I dont know. And I have to agree, she really looks better without ps.

edit: mistery solved. thanks.
 
boobies

I think the 1st picture is fake.

But, her boobies are a mystery, they look big and small all the time.

In Cruel Intentions they looked larger.

10096051.jpg
 
Keanoite agrees: That last shot is her head on another body

No.... its PHOTOSHOPED, not fake... it painfully obvious to anyone who's done a tiny amount of airbrushing. Compare her hands in every single shot

Boobs can be enhanced, but hair over the shoulders is very very very difficult to deal with and bland without far too much work. If you were to go to so much work, it would be for a lot more revealing a shot than these
 
Washburne
Washburne
Post 33 didn´t convince you?
Was gone for a few hours, just logged back in. We're still talking about boobs? Cool. 🙂
 
Was gone for a few hours, just logged back in. We're still talking about boobs? Cool. 🙂
I concur.

As for post 33, not entirely convinced but this is solely because im incredibly stubborn and cannot be seen to be wrong.

That said, I stand my theory of mysterious boob sizes of SMG and the images posted are all within the realm of SMG boobage.
 
Back
Top Bottom