Seth Green On Buffy Remake

AustCF

Five By Five
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
135
Age
38
Location
Newark, DE
First, I hope this isn't posted, I didn't see anything-

More reaction to the "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" remake from alumni has made its way online. This time Seth Green, who played the werewolf Oz for several seasons on the show, spoke about the upcoming film's effect on the fan base.

When asked during an interview with CNN about his thoughts on the reboot, Green replied:

"I saw that Joss wrote that open letter. Let's be fair, all he really said was, 'Hey, this isn't even 10 years old.' Are we really at the place where we're remaking 'Two and a Half Men'? Is that really still on the air, and we're remaking it? And where is the need for that other than some kind of capitalizing on a trend. You know, there's no public outcry for a remake of Buffy, there's only the opportunity in pop culture where vampires are very popular.

If Joss came out and said, 'I want to make a new Buffy movie,' even if he said, 'I want to do it like the reboot of Spider-Man. I want to put Buffy back in high school and I want to tell a different story with this character,' I think people would go with that. But the fact that people who are not connected to it and were not connected to the show or any of the mythology that was created going back to the movie -- which everyone kind of agreed wasn't a perfect version of its potential -- you know, I think that really confuses people. It confuses the audience. They're like, 'How am I supposed to feel about this?'

Couldn't agree more.

Source: http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/41771/seth-green-points-audience-confusion-over-buffy-remake
 
ashsummers
ashsummers
[No message]
Abbeycat
Abbeycat
[No message]
PrincessBuffy16
PrincessBuffy16
[No message]
Good on ye Seth! Proving once again what a cool customer he is.

You know, there's no public outcry for a remake of Buffy, there's only the opportunity in pop culture where vampires are very popular
.

Took the words right out of my mouth. Exactly how I feel.
 
Username
Username
"cool costumer" haha I love that saying :D
Good on ye Seth! Proving once again what a cool customer he is.

.

Took the words right out of my mouth. Exactly how I feel.

True, kind-of. I have an outcry for Joss to bring Buffyverse back in some form, wheather it's a Faith spin-off, or whatever. But for someone else to do it? No thanks.
 
M
Ms.Trick
Exactly!
B
Bexieh
[No message]
VisionGirl
VisionGirl
Well, TBH, we do have it back "in some form", just not the form a lot of people want. But there it is, official & canon & everything.
By the time is willing, and, if ever, Sarah finally decides that she would be willing to actually make a Buffy movie, she and everyone else from the original is going to be too old to recreate their role, unless it's only as a cameo appearance, passing the torch, or stake, to the next generation. Obviously, when and if that happens, it'll be "Melissa, the Vampire Slayer," or "Chelsea..." or "Margo...," or maybe just "Vampire Slayer." Until then, I would just as soon that they let the idea of a reboot just sit in a dark file somewhere, aging like fine wine. Then maybe we can have wine with our hot, fresh baked Buffy cookies.
 
VisionGirl
VisionGirl
Oh no you didn't WA! You used a Bangel analogy! Did hell just freeze over? ;)
The thing I agree with most is that he said that the show isn't even 10 years old yet, I suppose that would be my main bone of contention too.
 
I agree with everything he says, mostly with the pop culture-vampire trend thing.

At the time of Buffy, a serie about vampire was still sort of original. Now vampires are just the cool thing...It would kill the spirit a bit to make a remake now it's fashion.
 
Why, exactly, is vampires the cool thing these days? JUST because of Twilight? Give.Me.A.Break. I've read all the books, and Buffy is much better, so many more layers. Why wasn't vampires this big when Buffy was on..?
 
That is the first reasonable opinion (aside from Whedon's) I've read from the people involved with Buffy. He makes some very valid, good points, which is a far cry from all the "This won't work without Joss" we've gotten so far.
 
That is the first reasonable opinion (aside from Whedon's) I've read from the people involved with Buffy. He makes some very valid, good points, which is a far cry from all the "This won't work without Joss" we've gotten so far.

Yeah, but a lot of us on here have been saying this exact same thing.
 
Mumrik
Mumrik
I know. I was only talking about the cast/crew ;)
BuffyElevated
BuffyElevated
[No message]
white avenger
white avenger
Hot cookies was a Buffy metaphor. She never said that Angel would be the cookie recipient.
YES... Seth is so smart. I agree with everything he said!
I really do think it's all about capitalizing on the vampire crazy for these people behind the reboot. They don't care about the fanbase Buffy already has; they're only in it for the money.
 
Why, exactly, is vampires the cool thing these days? JUST because of Twilight? Give.Me.A.Break. I've read all the books, and Buffy is much better, so many more layers. Why wasn't vampires this big when Buffy was on..?

Well it's not just Twilight, you have True Blood too. Vampire Diaries too (haven't watched this one, no interest either).
 
Well it's not just Twilight, you have True Blood too. Vampire Diaries too (haven't watched this one, no interest either).

And Being Human. And if you ever browse the young adult section of your favorite bookstore...holy undead blood-suckers, Batman!
 
And Being Human. And if you ever browse the young adult section of your favorite bookstore...holy undead blood-suckers, Batman!

Lol yeah I know, the comic book store I use has a whole section dedicated to fiction involving the undead. So Seth is definitely correct, there's a craze out there right now that goes way beyond just Twilight.
 
white avenger agrees: Hot cookies was a Buffy metaphor. She never said that Angel would be the cookie recipient.

Oh, :nana: Buffy said it to Angel (& he repeated it in TGIQ) and you know it. 😀

Now, back to acting my age.
 
Back
Top Bottom