chasesummers
Cordy Lives
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2013
- Messages
- 338
So recently if I'm not mistaken SMG was again asked about returning to Buffy.
According to the celeb-news she said:
"Buffy was [already] a movie. See, I think people forget that," she told US TV show Access Hollywood. "Buffy was a movie first, and I don't know if you guys know this, but it didn't really work!"
"We spent our whole first year or two apologizing for the movie. So, I think it would be an incredibly different pressure . . . Plus, I'm a little old now. I feel like Buffy would have a wooden stake walker. I'm not quite sure how that would work."
OK...
1) In Buffy-verse, Slayers age. They are not immortals, they are not like the vampires.
2) Let's not forget that fans have grew with the show... speaking for myself, I would love to see a more mature Buffy now, being a role model for us, the Slayers.
3) How can SMG be too old to play Buffy when Buffy herself is 33 and Sarah is 36?
4) Again with the wooden stake walker thing, you're not handicap or physically weak at 36!
It's very understandable how she feels, we are our worst critics at the end.
She might be worried that she won't be able to pull off the fight scenes, that she won't be relatable, that she is too ''old''.
Speaking in general from my personal experience, when you do something which was a big part of your life in the past, as good as it was, as rewarding and amazing, sometimes you just don't want to return to it, the chapter has been closed and thats that, so if this is the case, its also very understandable.
Saying that ''it won't work'', ''I'm too old'', beating round the bush just bothers me. I don't expect anything from anyone, if Sarah doesn't want to return (which is a different story) than it's said and done. I'm very proud of the show and her personal work.
It would pain me to see the show be recreated and handed over to a younger generation with incredibly blank actors without a final contribution from the original cast.
...but I digress! 🙂
How do you guys feel about this?
According to the celeb-news she said:
"Buffy was [already] a movie. See, I think people forget that," she told US TV show Access Hollywood. "Buffy was a movie first, and I don't know if you guys know this, but it didn't really work!"
"We spent our whole first year or two apologizing for the movie. So, I think it would be an incredibly different pressure . . . Plus, I'm a little old now. I feel like Buffy would have a wooden stake walker. I'm not quite sure how that would work."
OK...
1) In Buffy-verse, Slayers age. They are not immortals, they are not like the vampires.
2) Let's not forget that fans have grew with the show... speaking for myself, I would love to see a more mature Buffy now, being a role model for us, the Slayers.
3) How can SMG be too old to play Buffy when Buffy herself is 33 and Sarah is 36?
4) Again with the wooden stake walker thing, you're not handicap or physically weak at 36!
It's very understandable how she feels, we are our worst critics at the end.
She might be worried that she won't be able to pull off the fight scenes, that she won't be relatable, that she is too ''old''.
Speaking in general from my personal experience, when you do something which was a big part of your life in the past, as good as it was, as rewarding and amazing, sometimes you just don't want to return to it, the chapter has been closed and thats that, so if this is the case, its also very understandable.
Saying that ''it won't work'', ''I'm too old'', beating round the bush just bothers me. I don't expect anything from anyone, if Sarah doesn't want to return (which is a different story) than it's said and done. I'm very proud of the show and her personal work.
It would pain me to see the show be recreated and handed over to a younger generation with incredibly blank actors without a final contribution from the original cast.
...but I digress! 🙂
How do you guys feel about this?
AnthonyCordova
your final comment about "blank actors" replacing the original cast in a movie worries me too.