Spuffy #6 - General Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm telling you, it is a losing battle. Not that I think you shouldn't write Meta - you totally should - but don't be disapointed if it doesnt sway them. They're delusional. The truth is in the text, and yet they still deny it. And they have a right to their shipping just as we do.

Not that their steadfast denial doesn't irritate me. You know what? We should just start rallying that Buffy's "I love yous" to Angel were a product of "pity" or "obligation" or whatever such nonsense Bangels say was her intention in "Chosen." If the text is open to that kind of interpretation, then it's completely legitimate for us to say Buffy was lying to Angel, just as they claim she lied to Spike.
 
Gum Gnome33
Gum Gnome33
Exactly
S
StarSlayer
Nah, I won't be disappointed, lol. I'll probably realize they're more delusional than I thought.
Personally, one thing I find particularly frustrating about Spuffy naysayers is that they tend to base a lot of their opinions on events from Season 6. I mean, we get it. Season 6 was a really dark time for Buffy--And Spike, soulless as he still was, was still very much involved in an epic struggle against his inner darkness in order to try to make it into the light with Buffy. Just because the two of them mistreated each other throughout the season does not mean that: A)There weren't plenty of beautiful moments between them or that: B) As a whole, their relationship couldn't have evolved into something great, as all we Spuffies believe it did/is still doing.

I mean, do Bangels take the events of Season 2 and cite them as reasons why Buffy and Angel could never work as a couple? No! And Angel could turn back into Angelus at the clap of some powerful witch's hands and then where would they be? At least in the midst of Spike's struggle to be good, he learned a thing or two so that if he ever lost his soul, he certainly wouldn't be starting from scratch from a moral standpoint, (his story in the comics is evidence of this in fact). And, hey, Buffy found herself perfectly able to relate to and seek out companionship with a soulless Spike, whereas she could never do that with Angelus.

Gah, sorry just had to vent!!
 
If we're talking about our personally most frustrating part of the nonbelievers... mine is the people who dislike Spuffy a lot because they dislike a Spike who's not evil. To me, it was obvious in season 2 that Spike was BA, but not totally evil. He was doing evil acts out of love... and when his love required he do a "good" act, he did it. Spike didn't do much of anything without love in his heart in season 2. So I don't understand how people can say they think Spike should be evil like he was in season 2. He was evil in season 2 because his love, Drusilla, required that of him. That and he was soulless with no chip or way to hinder his natural vampiric tendencies to be evil... But I believe a lot of his evil in season 2 (and really all of his vampiric live pre-chip) was because of his love for Drusilla.

The women that Spike loves inspire him. Cecily inspired him to write poetry. Drusilla inspired him to be as evil as he could be (while still loving her with everything he had). And Buffy inspired him to be a better man and be good again.

These people I'm referring to act as if Spike's center and all of his character and what makes him him changed... but what changed was his inspiration. He was still inspired by the women he loved, he just loved someone different and therefore, was inspired to be someone different and do different things.

But yeah, the people who cite Spike's changes for why they don't like Spuffy are personally very frustrating to me.
 
I've said this before, but I truly believe that one of the reasons the Bangels loathe Spuffy so much is because Bangel is threatened by it.

Interesting. The ships were never directly threatened by each other in canon (Bangel is Seasons 1-3, Spuffy Seasons 5-7 and they were never split up because of the other), but it's so funny to me how it's mostly us fans who created the love triangle. 😀
 
Joan the Vampire Slayer said:
I'm sad to hear that we've lost some comrades, and even sadder to hear that they've been seduced by the twisted, dysfunctional Bangel Delusion. Good riddance.

Who did we lose and what did they say???
 
Litheran
Litheran
In the JUMPING SHIP thread; some of our brethren had stated they didn't care for Spuffy as much anymore.
I don't know if anyone's switched their ships necessarily; if so may they be given a large bucket to empty the encroaching water from said ship.
 
His expression, which is to me one of the most emotionally powerful images of the entire series. Everyone will have their own response and interpretation but for me it is an expression of great sorrow and resignation - a moment of truth for Spike as he saw his last moments with this woman whom he gave his his heart and soul and mind to.

I never would think of this as a scene where the actors or the writer would think of in anyway as a joke in as humor. To me its every bit as emotionally significant to the character as the parting scene in IWRY - the same tragic and extremely painful sense of loss for Spike as it was for Buffy. Where Buffy rails against the injustice of her life and love, Spike accepts life as he sees it.

Wow, this post is really something.

For me, it means that in the end Buffy is a fighter and Spike is a lover. I think we underestimate the strength it took for both of them to let each other go. Sometimes when I watch that last scene I doubt if Buffy would have left if Spike hadn't told her too. Sometimes I think they would have remained in their trance forever if the world hadn't been crumbling around them and if Faith hadn't been yelling at Buffy to leave.

I don't think his "No, you don't" was a joke in anyway, and I'm confused as to why anyone would interpret it as such. It was clearly an instruction.

Plus as a metaphor of the spiritual transcendence, it is Spike reaching a level of understanding and acceptance as in the state of Nirvana and the spiritual ecstasy which ends his life in Sunnydale.

Well said. That's why he laughed. Because Spike is known for finding glee in all the wrong things, and even as he burned he delighted in the destruction of it all, and his part in it. Because that's just who Spike is; a lover of chaos. He figured that hey, if he was going down he might as well enjoy it, lol. Remember his last words were "I wanna see how it ends."

To me the kissing scene, while played as both light comedy and drama, when he sees Buffy go on automatic mode kissing Angel is very much connected to his response. When you love someone and you have lived through the last days that he lived with Buffy - that would have been the time that for her to say those words.

Agreed.

So - this scene never suggested any sense other than Spike in great sorrow.

It's plausible that Spike actually didn't believe her - but I like to believe he did, but didn't want her to think he did. Does that make sense? Saying "I love you" back would have been too much. It would finally sealed what both of them had known for a while; they were in love. But the world was ending, and there was no time for the two of them. Once again, Spike and Buffy had to put their own intentions on hold for their duties, and that's what makes them true heroes. If he had told he he loved her too, she would have burned with him down there. I truly believe that.

This was, IMO, foreshadow long before by Cassie/Cassandra when she speaks to Spike:
CASSIE: She'll tell you. Someday she'll tell you.

Exactly. I think many misinterpret that quote. Buffy did end up telling Spike what he wanted to hear in the end - but it was too late. This is the tragedy of Spike and Buffy. They simply didn't have enough time to reach their potential together. They had only just begun to realize how much they loved eachother, when they were wrenched away from eachother.

We know that Joss Whedon's intent was that these two people do love each other - but the seer Cassandra tells truths which are never believed.

Yep, and this is the delicious irony of Buffy.

---------- Post added at 08:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:25 PM ----------

Spuffy is for the adults, a love of shared experience, trust, pain, passion and an acceptance of faults.

I agree with this absolutely, but I'm uncomfortable referring to Bangel as "childish." I think it's anything but. I see Bangel as very dark, dysfunctional, and demented, really. It never ceases to amaze me when fans argue that Spuffy was the darker of the two 'ships when Angel was the one who fell in love with her when she was 15, stalked her, tried to kill her friends, left her alone, erased her memory, killed her slayers, and had no qualms with allowing the world to end and everyone to die so he could have her selfishly to himself.
 
I agree with this absolutely, but I'm uncomfortable referring to Bangel as "childish." I think it's anything but. I see Bangel as very dark, dysfunctional, and demented, really. It never ceases to amaze me when fans argue that Spuffy was the darker of the two 'ships when Angel was the one who fell in love with her when she was 15, stalked her, tried to kill her friends, left her alone, erased her memory, killed her slayers, and had no qualms with allowing the world to end and everyone to die so he could have her selfishly to himself.

This! This this this this this this this! Exactly this!
 
1. What are your favourite "nice moments" from during Buffy and Spike's "dark" period (from Smashed to Seeing Red)?

"Hells Bells", hands down. I love the subtle sadness between them, and the real respect and affection they show each-other.

2. If you were to incorporate a Spike/Buffy reunion in an Angel Season 5 episode, without changing its main structure, which would you choose and how would it happen?

I'd have liked to see someone call Buffy when Spike asked for her when he was first brought back.

3. (Have I asked this already... can't remember... )Do you think Buffy and Spike had sex before the battle in "Chosen"? Why

I go back and forth on this. I honestly don't... know. Neither would surprise me.

4. Three lowest Spuffy-lows? Three highest Spuffy-highs?

Lows:
Seeing Red - "Tell me again why I could never love you."
Dead Things - "There is nothing good for clean in you! You are dead inside!"
and
"Do you even like me?"
"Sometimes."

Highs:
Chosen - "I love you."
Touched - "I've seen the best and the worst of you..."
Intervention - "...not-so-pleasant Buffy... anything happened to Dawn, it'd destroy her..."

5. Do you think Buffy is the love of Spike's life? Do you think Spike is the love of Buffy's life? Do you believe in that concept (or the concept of soulmates and/or other often mentioned romantic concepts)?

Buffy is absolutely the love of Spike's life. She is is hero and his world. Do I think Spike is the love of Buffy's life? Absolutely - but I don't think she knows that yet. She loves him, no doubt - but her ability to really consider the implications of that been clouded by Angel and the extraordinary responsibility she carries on her back. There isn't much room in Buffy's life for love. Do I believe in soulmates? No, not in real life. But I accept that in the Buffyverse canon Angel is Buffy's soulmate - but only because the universe said so, and to further its own intentions using them as puppets of destruction, and what is Buffy known for doing? Fighting her 'fate.' So no comment.
 
Last edited:
Tranquillity
Tranquillity
[No message]
I have given my moment of (confused) silence for our lost ones.

For some reason, my mind says "if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen." And Spuffy is hot (literally on fire), maybe too much so for some😕

We must remember that some people think that it's good for relationships to be lopsided, full of emotional pain, and doomed to end before it began.

For those of us who see a strong relationship as that of true equality, intense passion (both kinds, of course😛) and hope for more, Spuffy will remain in our hearts.

Some people just speak different "languages" of love. I speak fluent Spuffy.


There needs to be a t-shirt for "I Speak Fluent Spuffy" I love this phrase.

---------- Post added at 03:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:33 AM ----------

Which is something that irritates me very much. And it's because they believe because Buffy will always have feelings for Angel, he is her final love. She can't love anyone after she's found her final love.

Though recently, I've found a lot of other differences in the way I think about the show and love in general and they way Bangels do. The thread I created about how your ships and characters relate to your personality has opened my eyes into just how different from me the Bangels are.


Sorry for being still on "lost mode" here - but I have been looking for just a this discussion - where can I find this thread? what is it called?
 
Z
zobothehobo
*Not sure if she's allowed to post in here, since she doesn't ship one over the other...*

I think I've said this before elsewhere, but I don't feel like it's a Bangel vs. Spuffy thing. She loved BOTH men/vamps in different ways. I think zobothehobo pretty much said it: just because you loved one person, doesn't mean you can't love another.

Buffy and Angel had an all-consuming, passionate, instant-attraction, forever-connection kind of love. I think they are soulmates (now, don't jump on me yet, Spuffies!) who will always be connected, always have a love and respect for one another, but may not be able to be in a functional relationship. (I have lived this: I dated a guy on and off for 2 1/2 years; he was pretty much me, but male. However, we were awful to each other and never would have made it in the long haul. We are still friends, and though we sometimes go for long periods without talking for whatever reason, we both know we have eachother's backs always.)

Obviously, Spike and Buffy's relationship was constantly evolving: it went from enemies, hatred, distrust (S2), to apathy, disgust, and pity (S4), to obsession and loathing then a partnership (S5), then onto a love/abuse/hate/self-loathing mess (S6), then FINALLY in S7 they start to get it right and base their relationshp on a mutual respect, trust, and finally, mutual love. I believe Spuffy would be the more functional relationship if it could be done, though there might still be some slayer/vampire friction. The biggest difference is that Spike sought out and fought for his soul so he could truly be what Buffy needed - whether it support through friendship or romantically. Angel was cursed with a soul, and even though he may be glad to have it, he couldn't really be in a relationship without endangering the one he loves and the people around her.

I can't really go much deeper into it right now because it's been awhile since I've watch seasons 6 and 7, but I'm sure I'll have more insight then. 🙂
 
S
StarSlayer
ITA :) (even the part where I think Buffy and Angel are soulmates. Yet, I think Buffy and Spike are
nmcil12
nmcil12
all consuming passion - and that is what I don't like and can't accept for the young girl of this time.
So, while in the midst of my re-watch, it occurred to me why I hate Bangel so much, and why I dread watching the two together on screen.

They're just so...happy in season 2. It's so sad, because you know what's going to happen. The pain that Buffy is going to have to go through...what she's going to have to do, and give up...it just breaks my heart.

I don't hate Bangel in this season, in fact I sort of can stand them in a way, but theres this constant tragic tint that follows them around. You just know its going to end badly. And the Bangel Theme? So sad. It's beyond me why people think it's romantic.

The great thing about Spuffy is I never feel that doomed theme with them. Things between them do not get worse - they get better. That's how it should be, I think. Their relationship is always evolving. But with bangel, it's about moving backwards in a way - from lovers to enemies to "friends"? Its warped.
 
S
StarSlayer
[No message]
Z
zobothehobo
[No message]
*Not sure if she's allowed to post in here, since she doesn't ship one over the other...*

I think I've said this before elsewhere, but I don't feel like it's a Bangel vs. Spuffy thing. She loved BOTH men/vamps in different ways. I think zobothehobo pretty much said it: just because you loved one person, doesn't mean you can't love another.

Buffy and Angel had an all-consuming, passionate, instant-attraction, forever-connection kind of love. I think they are soulmates (now, don't jump on me yet, Spuffies!) who will always be connected, always have a love and respect for one another, but may not be able to be in a functional relationship. (I have lived this: I dated a guy on and off for 2 1/2 years; he was pretty much me, but male. However, we were awful to each other and never would have made it in the long haul. We are still friends, and though we sometimes go for long periods without talking for whatever reason, we both know we have eachother's backs always.)

Obviously, Spike and Buffy's relationship was constantly evolving: it went from enemies, hatred, distrust (S2), to apathy, disgust, and pity (S4), to obsession and loathing then a partnership (S5), then onto a love/abuse/hate/self-loathing mess (S6), then FINALLY in S7 they start to get it right and base their relationshp on a mutual respect, trust, and finally, mutual love. I believe Spuffy would be the more functional relationship if it could be done, though there might still be some slayer/vampire friction. The biggest difference is that Spike sought out and fought for his soul so he could truly be what Buffy needed - whether it support through friendship or romantically. Angel was cursed with a soul, and even though he may be glad to have it, he couldn't really be in a relationship without endangering the one he loves and the people around her.

I can't really go much deeper into it right now because it's been awhile since I've watch seasons 6 and 7, but I'm sure I'll have more insight then. 🙂

Crap. I hit "enter" on the rep accidently. But, I totally agree with everything you said here, even the part about Buffy and Angel being soulmates (and I'm a die-hard Spuffy). I also think Buffy and Spike are soulmates too, but it's different from what Buffy and Angel share (or shared, lol).
 
"Buffy and Angel had an all-consuming, passionate, instant-attraction, forever-connection kind of love" (PassionBecoming)

And this is what I so disliked about this relationship - for a young and totally inexperienced young girl; it is too much. One has only to go to the 800 pound gorilla in the Bangel love story - Buffy being turned into an attempted murderess.

There is simply, IMO, no way that Buffy was mature enough to survive this love. And while the Acathla Cycle has to play out with Buffy taking on the full mantle of Heroine and the rite of passage in the Heroes Journey - outside of this metaphor plot element - just about everything else effected her ultimately with severe trauma.

From the events of BS8 - that trauma was still deep enough that it made her extremely vulnerable to the powerful forces controlling events in S8.
 
"Buffy and Angel had an all-consuming, passionate, instant-attraction, forever-connection kind of love" (PassionBecoming)

And this is what I so disliked about this relationship - for a young and totally inexperienced young girl; it is too much.

Definitely! I think it was too much for both of them. Angel had never experienced true love, either. I also don't think it is a relationship that would have much of a chance in the future because, really, the circumstances haven't changed. (I haven't read far into S8 yet, so...) Buffy is still a Slayer; Angel is still a vampire with a cursed soul. They still feel a pull towards each other and know that to get involved with each other could be bad for the world, because their main concern is for one another. This is why I say Spuffy is more "functional" - they are able to have whatever relationship they have and still go about their business without (too much) distraction.
 
Found an interesting quote, decided to share:

Joss Whedon: Conversations by David Lavery, Cynthia Burkhead
http://books.google.com/books/about/Joss_Whedon.html?id=IPNSR9PQ76gC

From the interview with David Bianculli, May, 9 2000.

Joss: "It's always fun to shoot the scenes with James. Sarah loves working with him, because he has a great rapport with everyone and people don't get many scenes with him -- Spike -- so they always relish them, because he always brings a very different perspective.
 
Miss Kitty
Miss Kitty
Aww ! Thank you for sharing this quote Elena ♥ :)
P
PrettyLilGirl
:D Everything I read about him just confirms that he is amazing at his job :)
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Sarah praises James to the skies. I've read other quotes from her about him. She thinks he's a great actor.
I confess I equally ship both Bangel and Spuffy. (That's why I hope Joss never really settles on one or the other). I'll just echo what appeals to me about Spuffy. Spike allows Buffy to be an adult, to be a leader. Even though he is older and has more experience than her, he never treats her less than an equal. Angel and Giles (though I like them both) have trouble adjusting to Buffy the grown-up.
 
janees10.png


Jane is fantastic ! 😀
 
X
xaphania
I love Jane Espenson
S
StarSlayer
Go Jane! :D
Moscow Watcher
Moscow Watcher
Yay! Go Jane!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom