Spuffy Meta Recs #1

Joan the Vampire Slayer

Carpe Spuffy!
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
7,167
Age
41
Location
Tulsa
At Amy's request, here is the official Spuffy Meta Recs thread.

Please use this thread only to recommend and link to various metas involving the couple.

(Remember: PG-13 ratings only)
 
I know this is going to be a stupid question, so sorry. But what is a Meta?
 
I know this is going to be a stupid question, so sorry. But what is a Meta?

Meta can basically be described as essays... observations, explanations etc. in essay form about various aspects of the show or fandom.

So I'll start by recc'ing some of gabrielleabelle's Spuffy meta pieces. She's the queen of meta, seriously.

In the Soddin' Engine: A Look at the Beneath You Church Scene - It's my favorite scene in the Buffyverse and I try to do it justice with this bit of meta.

Buffy/Spike: When She Fell - When did Buffy fall in love with Spike? I present two different, yet canon-compliant, theories.

And this one is a piece I think everyone should read, not just the Spuffy fans, because it helps to explain why we'll never agree or resolve the various fandom debates (though this has a focus on Bangel vs. Spuffy).
Fandom-Eyewear
 
A
alliern21
Thanks so much Xaph :)
W
Willow-Tree
[No message]
Wowowow. Just read some mini-meta that is awesome. From the comments thread at this Whedonesque post, made by the user Lirazel.

Particularly this comment:

To me, Spike is the biggest loser on the show. The entire point of Spike for me is that that "coolness" you're talking about? Is all an act, and that he's painfully, painfully, painfully aware at all times that if you strip away Nikki's jacket and the peroxide and the scar, he's still William, sitting in that Victorian drawing room, getting rejected. Spike is the ultimate outsider on a show about outsiders. He's not cool, he knows it, and one of the things I love about the Scoobies is that they know it, too (they see right through him, and it's fantastic). Yes, he's a giant loser who somehow, sometimes manages to convince others (and himself) that he is, in fact, a badass. Even rarer (but more awesome) are the times when he really is a badass and exudes it for all to see.

This is the point of "Fool for Love," but if you go back to the earlier seasons, you'll see that those clues were there all along. He's a whipped boyfriend (I hate that phrase, but that's how our society would phrase it) who gets beat up by the Slayer's mom, makes a deal with his worst enemy to save his own skin, takes off like a coward, comes back drunk and sniveling, and then gets emasculated by the Initiative. Loooo-ser.

I will agree with you that the writers did force him where he didn't necessarily fit in S4: he's got some fun stuff going on, but it doesn't quite work because they don't take they chip seriously; they treat him as comedic relief. It doesn't entirely work, and I don't blame you at all for feeling that it was forced. (On the DVDs, James Marsters straight-up says, "They tried to make me Cordelia, and it didn't work.")

But I've always been confused by the idea that character development is a bad thing, that a character should stay static and not develop. I mean, Lilah Morgan (my personal fav on Angel) is a villain but becomes incredibly complex. If they'd tried to redeem her, I wouldn't have complained; I would have thought it was fantastic (they sort of did the same thing with Darla, who I also love).

I'm also really confused by the idea that they had to come up with stuff for him to do. That's what they have to do with every character. Again, I agree that the chip didn't work well in S4, and I'm not so crazy about the pawn of the First in S7, but other than that, I think it all works really, really well.

When I was watching OOMM for the first time and Spike has the whole "I love you" dream, I went: "DUH!" And smacked my forehead. Because of course Spike's in love with Buffy. Of course he is. It made perfect sense to me. So I didn't see that as grasping for straws at all. It fit perfectly into my view of who he is, that he would fall in love with this strong, smart, fierce woman who is so far "above him." That's what he does. He needs someone to latch onto in that way.

I also disagree about S7, a season that has so many ridiculous weaknesses (but that I love since I love the characterizations of Buffy and Spike and Dawn and Anya). Why is it Spike's fault if the writers had run out of things to do with Xander by that time (I can think of a number of things they could have done with him, but they never asked me) but still had things to say about Spike? I think if you go back and watch the season, you'll see that Spike actually doesn't take over the show: he doesn't have more scenes than anyone else; his writing is just better.

his final sacrifice to stop the uber-vamps was his final "look how cool I am" speech. And again, I disagree: to me it's: "Look how far I've come." With Spike, the important word is "Real." Very little that he has or is is actually real. So that's why "Intervention" is so important; that's why the soul is so important; that's why "Chosen" is so important: because finally, finally he's found something that's real and his. After searching for it since he was alive. He thought it was what Drusilla offered him in the stable in 1880, but that wasn't it. "Chosen" was it. There's a reason that he's (literally) "effulgent" in that scene. 😉
-Source (user Lirazel): Here

This just gets Spike so, so well. I want to show this to all the Spike-haters, lol. What she says about the theory that Spike 'takes over in S7' is also dead-on.

Actually this whole comment thread at Whedonesque is very interesting, but all of Lirazel's posts just speak to me. If I could get my thoughts to come out my brain in a coherent manner, this is what they'd be saying. 😛

And there's a subsequent discussion on this at her livejournal.

Really interesting reading.
 
Tranquillity
Tranquillity
thanks for bringing this :) going to read more now...
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Joan the Vampire Slayer
This would be a great rebuttal for the article about how Spike "ruined" the show.
S
StarSlayer
We should have brought this meta to their attention, lol! I absolutely love it!
An update to Gabrielleabelle's 'Buffy Came Back Wrong' meta series. This is an excellent series looking at Buffy's depression in season six, episode by episode.

The newest update looks at Dead Things and Older and Far Away. The Dead Things section is particularly interesting.

A couple of pertinent quotes to follow the board's rules about linking:

When Xander and Anya stop by to invite them to dance, Buffy bows out and wanders up to the balcony.

This is an interesting scene. Buffy's purposely isolating herself physically, reflecting the emotional isolation she's felt all season. She places herself watching over them, much like she often ends up doing in a Slaying capacity. And it's here where Spike approaches.

This is Spike very much in the role of the metaphor now. He is Death. He holds the power here in a way we haven't really seen him do so before. Unlike previous instances we've seen, he acts as the initiator. Buffy puts up a cursory protest but then gives in.

Spike: You see ... you try to be with them...but you always end up in the dark ... (whispering in her ear) ...with me. What would they think of you ... if they found out ... all the things you've done? If they knew ... who you really were.


It's almost like Spike's verbalizing her thoughts. But there's more going on here. Remember back to Gone when invisible!Buffy was playing with Spike while Xander watched, oblivious. It's a commentary on the events of the season, in some ways. Buffy floundering for help and nobody noticing. She's communing with Death and her friends are down below, dancing.

In some ways, the balcony scene kinda sums up Buffy's whole arc in S6. Out where her friends could see her (but won't notice), Death won't let her escape. Even though she initially resists, she eventually welcomes it.

Spike gets Buffy home to bed. Then we get to a deliciously meta-full dream sequence.

There's oodles of different ways to read the dream. I'm gonna lay out the one consistent with this meta's goals.

It is incredibly significant that the dream opens with Buffy in bed. Remember back to the beginning of the episode? How Buffy and Spike always miss the bed? She didn't now. Buffy's in her bed, out of the ground, in her place of comfort, and Spike comes to her. It's a fantasy. Specifically, it's the hope she had when she went to Spike to help her with her depression. It's how she wanted her coping mechanism to work. He would elevate to her level (instead of her going down to his).

However, we get the reality in the next cut when we see Buffy and Spike in his crypt. Spike's handcuffed and Buffy's...doing that sex thing. Buffy's in control, Spike trusting her completely (this is tying into some Katrina-Spike parallels that the episode makes. Unfortunately, that is outside the bounds of the meta, so I'm only gonna mention it in passing). Compare this to the balcony scene we saw earlier with Death having the power. The dream reveals Buffy's perception (or revelation) of her own control of the relationship.

Click for the full meta.

Other meta in this series.
 
Ooh, thanks for posting, Amy. I'll have to check this out tomorrow after work.

My rec for the day: Angearia discusses Buffy and Forgiveness:
I've read a lot of posts recently, some old, some not so old. And it never fails to dishearten when I read that Buffy's a bitch. That she was awful to Spike. That she never made it up to him. That she was an immature and selfish bitch during Season 7 and how fans hate her so much.

I've never hated her. I was disappointed in her in Season 6, but I still felt for her. She was in pain and she acted out. She wasn't the only person who did wrong, but for some folks it feels like she's the one who is blamed as never making up for it (for others, they feel this is true for Willow or Spike). I read a post that said everyone learned from their mistakes in Season 6 except Buffy. She got off scot-free. And I'm baffled by this. The only way I make sense of this is if they don't understand Buffy. They expect her words. They want her to self-castigate. To fall on the altar, to burn herself on the cross like Spike. But that's not her way...
Rather than focus on her and Spike's mutual failure in the past, she will help him forge ahead. It's another way she's different from Angel. Guilt when not followed by action makes one useless. As Spike said to her, you "can't say sorry, can't say forgive me." Not for such crimes as they've committed against each other. All you can do is say, "I've changed." And that's what Buffy shows Spike (just as Spike showed her he'd changed by fighting to win back his soul). Buffy shows, not tells. She doesn't say I've changed. She shows him.

Buffy doesn't believe she deserves forgiveness. Forgiveness would end her suffering. Instead of seeking forgiveness, she makes amends. She helps Spike to heal, protects him, saves him. Instead of helping herself, she helps him...
Read full meta here
 
It kinda boggles my mind how some people can't see what's clearly in the text of the show (Buffy loving Spike romantically.) I just don't get it.

Anyway, it's as if LiveJournal knew my bewilderment because this showed up on my flist this morning. A lovely meta/picspam which highlights all the important Spuffy moments (including the Showtime scene which I think definitely shows she loves him romantically.)

There is such a wide difference between this and Angel's grand declaration of love ot Buffy. And I think this speaks of the selflessness more, Angel wants to protect Buffy. Spike realizes Buffy doesn't want that, and he sits there at her beck and call. Ready, waiting, hoping, that she'll ask him to do something. And I think that night is the most perfect reward. There is so much between two people that you will never know, but I know the way you're heart fills when someone tells you something selfless about you. My grandmother likes to say that to tell someone you're in love with them is telling them something about you. You're telling them you're capable of love, that you're worthy of the return. Telling them you love them, though, she says is speaking about them. They are worthy of love, they are important, they are cherished.

I Love You
"I Honestly Love You"
"Truly Madly Deeply Do"
"I've Loved You All Along"
"I'ma Tell You One Time"
A Meta
- by ahigheroctave
 
S
soulunsung
Side note: This immediately made me think of Spike's speech to Buffy in S7's "Touched" where he's trying to lift her up AND he's doing exactly what this meta says - he's telling her something about BOTH himself AND herself. So, yes...karma & kudos!
It kinda boggles my mind how some people can't see what's clearly in the text of the show (Buffy loving Spike romantically.) I just don't get it.

I completely agree. It's really hard for me to understand, as well. Personally? I think it's denial. Or Bangels feel threatened by Spuffy - so they feel the need to deny the romance that was so blatantly there. Whatever.

Thanks for the picspam link. *goes to check it out*
 
While I was browsing though gabriellabelle's journal, I found a rather interesting meta she wrote a while back discussing the AR. It's a good read, she makes some great points - and the comments are particularily interesting.

Here's an excerpt:

While it is in-character for Buffy to avoid the personal responsibility for her abuse of Spike, it's unsatisfying, as an audience member, to watch her be relieved of any guilt or accountability for what she did. Instead, it's all put on Spike's shoulders to bear.

And, thus, Spike becomes an even more sympathetic character.

This particular aspect of the AR isn't frightfully critical of me, and it does, admittedly, come down to "It's just not fair!" However, I do feel that the contrast between what's shown onscreen and what we're meant to see is significant enough to point out.

Seeing Red: The Dreaded Topic
 
Very interesting read, and she does make some good points. I didn't read all the comments though. However, I do disagree with some other points she makes.

With the AR, we also get Buffy's final instance of being punished for sex (in TV canon). The AR was a direct result of the sex they had had previously. Spike was trying to initiate sex as they had done before, and he was unaware as to how the situation had changed. What a wonderful feminist message. A casual sexual relationship can lead to rape. Yay. S6, on the whole, seems to go out of its way to present sex as destructive to Buffy. The AR is just the icing on the cake in that regard.

Maybe I watched a different version of s6 (doubtful though), but I never saw the AR as a punishment for Buffy having sex with Spike and how she treated him, nor should it be seen as such. I actually hate when people say, "She had it coming." No one deserves that. Hell, Spike even knew that when he realized what he was doing! And he felt so guilty about it, as seen in "Beneath You." Instead, I always saw the scene as the demon inside Spike taking over his human side. He was still a vampire with no soul. I mean even Angel did some horrible things as Angelus, including rape.

I also never thought s6 presented "sex" as destructive to Buffy. Although it was an addiction to Buffy and this may sound odd, but it seemed like Buffy got somewhat better after having sex with Spike. For example, in the beginning of "Dead Things," she starts opening up and having a conversation with him. She obviously got to a point in their relationship that she felt was more than just sex, although she completely denied it. IMO, the "destructive" part of their relationship was rather how she emotionally abused Spike, even after they broke up. And Buffy and Spike discussed this in "Never Leave Me." The AR was Spike completely misreading the situation since Buffy did give a lot of mixed messages, and again, the demon overpowering his human side.

On a feminist level, it is appalling how the AR scene was handled. It's frighteningly regressive in the amount of power it gives to the potential rapist in terms of the aftermath. It victimizes the heroine of the show in a way we'd never seen before.

I agree that more could have been done, especially in s7, with the aftermath of the AR scene. However, I don't think Spike had that much power after the AR. Xander hated him, well into s7, for what he did to Buffy. And he always seemed quick to point that out to Buffy ("Beneath You," "Him," "Sleeper"). Plus, once Dawn found out, she completely cared less for him, even threatened to kill him if he ever touched Buffy again.

And it's not like Buffy welcomed Spike back with open arms. Even after she saw his penance in "Beneath You" and was trying to understand what it meant now that he had a soul, she still shuddered when he touched her ("Him"). Although Buffy was the victim, I always felt she still had the upper-hand in the aftermath.

Furthermore, I'm all for feminism and girl-power. But, the character of Buffy was always quick to change her feelings when it came to vampires getting their souls aka Angel. At the end of s2 when Angel got his soul back before she killed him, she immediately recognized the change. She knew she wasn't killing Angelus, the vampire who killed Jenny, tortured Giles, and tried to kill her and her friends. No way. She knew she was killing Angel. The man she fell in love with and the man who fell in love with her, hence her emotional good-bye to him and the effects afterward. But, I never see any feminist arguments over this, maybe caused she ended up killing him. So, even if Buffy quickly became sympathetic to Spike once she learned he had a soul despite the AR, I think it's within her character. I think it doesn't degrade her powerful side nor feminism for that matter, especially if someone is trying to seek forgiveness for their actions. I think it actually makes someone more powerful by listening to the person who wants redemption. And while Buffy didn't come out and say, "I forgive you Spike," her actions showed that she began to trust him again.

Yikes. I hope I'm making sense in all that. 🙂
 
Very interesting read, and she does make some good points. I didn't read all the comments though. However, I do disagree with some other points she makes.



Maybe I watched a different version of s6 (doubtful though), but I never saw the AR as a punishment for Buffy having sex with Spike and how she treated him, nor should it be seen as such. I actually hate when people say, "She had it coming." No one deserves that. Hell, Spike even knew that when he realized what he was doing! And he felt so guilty about it, as seen in "Beneath You." Instead, I always saw the scene as the demon inside Spike taking over his human side. He was still a vampire with no soul. I mean even Angel did some horrible things as Angelus, including rape.

I concur with you in that the AR was never about punishing Buffy. It was simply about showing what Spike was and what he needed to go and do.

I think the person writing the journal is very wrong when she says it was all about Buffy. That scene was all about Spike for me. She talks about it sending out a bad message that you get what you deserve, i really don't agree with that. If you watch that episode you know its about Spike not being able to keep his feelings in check and not knowing when to stop until it was too late. That's the message.
 
S
StarSlayer
[No message]
Whoops, I just realized this thread was only suppose be used to post links to metas. Sorry about my long post then 🙂
 
I've linked this and even started a discussion on it before, but it remains my favorite Spike Meta and my favorite S6 Meta in general.

Had the writers truly wished to demonstrate the inevitability of a soulless creature's descent into evil, they could have done so decisively by having Buffy and the others treat Spike well--and having Spike fall to his worst nature anyway. But this would have made Spike a far less sympathetic character overall. Unwilling to have Spike prove capable of staying good without a soul, but still forced by their plans to rehabilitate him later on to keep the character sympathetic, the writers were in a bind, and forced to limp along making Spike sorta kinda evil, maybe, if you look at him sideways, except when he's not.

All About Spike - Barb's end-of-season review-cum-letter to ME
 
I've linked this and even started a discussion on it before, but it remains my favorite Spike Meta and my favorite S6 Meta in general.


Quote:
Had the writers truly wished to demonstrate the inevitability of a soulless creature's descent into evil, they could have done so decisively by having Buffy and the others treat Spike well--and having Spike fall to his worst nature anyway. But this would have made Spike a far less sympathetic character overall. Unwilling to have Spike prove capable of staying good without a soul, but still forced by their plans to rehabilitate him later on to keep the character sympathetic, the writers were in a bind, and forced to limp along making Spike sorta kinda evil, maybe, if you look at him sideways, except when he's not.

All About Spike - Barb's end-of-season review-cum-letter to ME

I don't agree with all Barb's sentiments - I'm a bit more accepting of season six than she is, but she does make some great points. I really like this one:

Personally I don't believe the two-separate-people dodge for a minute, and would love to see Buffy confronted head-on with the fact that having a soul doesn't change Spike all that much. He loves her with or without a soul, when Angel couldn't. When confronted by a magical barrier to their relationship, Angel bailed; Spike smashed it.

It's never been my burning desire to see Buffy land an ordinary significant other and settle down to a thrilling life of watching TV and going to the mall. If I wanted to watch that, I've got a front row seat for my own life. I have to wonder if Mutant Enemy realizes how silly it sounds to say in interviews that Spike's no good for Buffy because he can't go to the mall and watch TV with her. Since when? Spike is so effing domesticated it's pathetic--he watches the Great Pumpkin, for crying out loud. Unless Buffy's somehow stripped of her Slayer abilities permanently, she will never have a normal life--and possibly that's the way the show will ultimately end, with Buffy retiring as a Slayer and Spike shanshu'ing. But someday I kinda hope Buffy'll realize that a normal life is not the be-all and end-all of existence, and weird love is sometimes the best love of all.

I have always liked the Royal Anna's Meta. It was some of the first I ever read when really getting into the fandom. It is written from the heart so is really accessible:

the_royal_anna: In which I prove why no-one should ever let me start talking about Buffy and Spike
the_royal_anna: Snow Day 2! You don't get days gifted t
the_royal_anna: In which I talk about my favourite subject. Lots.
the_royal_anna: Chosen
the_royal_anna: as promised...
 
S
Spikefan31
I just read her meta about Chosen, and it was AMAZING!!! Thanks :)
B
Buffanator
"weird love is sometimes the best love of all"... perfect! that is the perfect way to describe Spuffy love!
S
StarSlayer
I adore her analysis of Chosen. :)
P
PrettyLilGirl
that chosen one is amazing
This is something I posted in my LJ recently, a product of my thinky-thoughts after re-watching Season 5, and the large amount of time I spend commuting now to my new job (leaves lots of time for writing!). It's sort of a cazy "theory", with a healthy touch of fan-wanking, but despite, I do think I make some good points. It's long, so bear with me. Comments and feedback are much appreciated.

--

Buffy’s Gift

There’s something I’ve been thinking quite a lot about since my recent re-watch of Season 5. And as a result of my musing, and theorizing, I’ve come to a rather radical decision;

Spike was Buffy’s “gift” - not Dawn.

Huh? Now, let me explain.

As we all know, throughout the fifth season of Buffy the prevailing theme was that of our heroine as coming to terms and accepting her duty as the Slayer and status as the Chosen one. Buffy has always struggled with juggling her personal life with her responsibly as the Slayer, and has at times resented the sacrifices she’s had to make as a result of her duty.

As Buffy learned more about the history of the Slayers, she learned that first Slayer was created by forcing a girl to share the blood of a demon. Even though offered more power, Buffy refuses it, on the basis that its of demon origin. Unable to defeat the seemingly un-killable Glory, Buffy starts to lose resolve.

Then it gets confusing. In a quasi-vision, The First Slayer reveals something important; she tells Buffy that “death is her gift” and that “love will bring her to her gift.” Buffy expresses her fear that she’s losing her ability to love, due to all of the loss and violence she has experienced in her short life. The Slayer assures her that she is not losing it, in fact that it is the opposite; that rather, she is “full of love.”

Huh? At this point, the audience is as confused as Buffy is. Buffy has a “gift”? Since when? Is this a metaphorical gift, or a literal one? What is it’s purpose? And as usual, it’s much more complicated then the audience believes.

This First Slayer’s message echo’s Spike’s words earlier in the Season in “Fool For Love’”, “Death is your art. You make it with your hands everyday.” Most can agree that death is a huge theme in Season 5 for Buffy. Coming to terms with her identity as a killer is something that is difficult for her. So, in typical ironic fashion, Joss would have Buffy go out as her death saving the world - not the death of someone else, or the defeating of a foe - but her own death, willingly and happily.

But we all know how it ends. Let’s back up. What evidence is there that Dawn doesn’t necessarily need to be interpreted as Buffy’s “gift”? In order to understand the importance of this “gift” we need to understand the nature of it. The First Slayer insinuated that in order for Buffy to be able to recognize and utilize her “gift” she must overcome something. If loving Spike were a race, it would be a cross-country trip. Buffy had to go against everything she believed in to love Spike. With Dawn, it wasn’t difficult. She told Giles she felt that she had to protect her, and that she wanted too. There was nothing to overcome. Nothing to fight against. The love for Dawn was programmed into her. It was instinctual. The memories, the love, were all already there. Regardless of how false they were, they felt real to her.
Adversely, with Spike, the love had to be created, it had to blossom from nothing. Hatred had to turn into love. The impossible had to happen. She had to let him in, and then had to have her trust violated, and in turn, had to have the strength to come back from that. They had to come full-circle. She had to forgive him. She had to risk the pain - again. He had to change. She had to give all of herself to him. And for all she gave, she was rewarded. And he was saved. Back to that later.

Set up for Season 5: We know the story: Buffy gets injured by a vamp. Not a uber-vamp - a regular, ordinary vamp with a bad 80s mullet. Wants to step up her game and so she goes to Spike on how to be a better Slayer - since he’s killed two of his own.

What made that fight special? Why did she lose?

Buffy thought she knew what her “gift” was; her ability to kill vampires. Then Spike told her that “death is your gift. You make it with your hands everyday” and that affirmed it for her. Her skill as a killer was her “gift.” Made sense, right? Was her ability to kill her “gift” not her actual death? It seemed so. After all, Spike said so, just like The First Slayer. Spike, the Truth-Sayer in the group. So, we all believed that the show would end with Buffy killing the foe and saving the world. Again. Like she always does. Instead, we get the unthinkable; an act of complete selfless sacrifice. A world without the Slayer. Dawn, shaken, but saved. We see Spike crying real tears over her lifeless body. We wonder what will happen next.

Every Slayer has a death wish. Even you.

In the back of Buffy’s mind, did she want to die? This comment made Buffy think though; maybe her death was her “gift.” Was Spike right? Did she have a “death wish’? A unspoken desire to die? After all, isn’t that what she longed for, in some way? Release from responsibly? Peace? A grand finale? Every Slayer has a an expiration date, she said so herself. She doesn’t argue with Spike when he tells her she’s “in love” with death - after all.Buffy is confused. All she knows is that she can’t let Dawn die. She couldn’t live in a world without her. So in a final act of rebellion, Buffy jumps, believing her interpretation - that her death was a “gift” to her sister, to the world, and to the people she’d been chosen to protect.

But why did Buffy start to question her ability in the first place? And how did the First Slayer and Spike put her back on her path?

In a quest to find answers, Buffy follows Giles into the desert, in an effort to “regain focus, learn more about their role.” This is where she meets the Slayer. She get this big message about the “gift” then after this, we veers off track a bit. We’re sidetracked with the Spike’s In Love With Buffy and Joyce Dying sub-plots, as well as the Drama That is Dawn’s Reaction to Being The Key. Finally, we return to the over-all arc of the season; Buffy examining what it means to be a Slayer, how to be better, stronger, and learn more about the Slayers that came before her. This is where, yet again, Spike comes in. Remember that Buffy originally went to Spike for knowledge on how he killed the two Slayers. She needs him, yet doesn’t know it yet. With Glory still seemingly unkillable, Buffy needs answers and now. By confronting Spike, she is confronting one of the only people who has the potential power to overtake her. It’s a bold move, especially in the wounded state she’s in. It suggests a subconscious trust (but the topic of Trust and Spuffy is for another post).

Since the Slayer tells her that she is full of love (not losing it, as Buffy fears), Buffy assumes that means for Dawn, because at that point, she is who Buffy loves the most. But Buffy’s wrong. Her “gift” refers to who she will love in the future - Spike. More on this as we continue.

Maybe being the perfect Slayer means being too hard to love at all.

This was the direction Buffy was headed towards - drowning in doubt - and Spike pulled her out of the waters. He rescued her, inspired her to love again. Inspired her to fight again. After she’d been so badly damaged by Angel, Riley…after losing her mother.

What about love? Not just boyfriend love.

You think you’re losing your ability to love. You’re afraid that being the Slayer means losing your humanity. You are full of love. You love with all your soul…that’s why you pull away from it.

Think. Buffy spent a lot of effort telling Spike how much she didn’t love him. Why? Who was she trying to convince? Him…or herself? Love scares Buffy. She associates it with loss, pain, suffering.

The First Slayer tells Buffy that she can only lose her ability to love if she rejects love. So, in order to gain strength, she must embrace love and the pain that comes with it.

Love is pain. And the Slayer forges strength from pain.

If any two people could win an award for causing each other more pain, it’d be Buffy and Spike. They’ve tried to kill each other. They’ve used each other. They’ve hurt each other emotionally, physically, and every which way in between. Yet, in the end, he gave her the strength to fight her last fight. His love for her inspired him to be a better man. In the end, he saved them all. So, who was her real “gift”? And it was all made possible by her love for him which was only possible because she risked her heart.

Love…give…forgive. Risk the pain. It is your nature. Love will bring you to your gift.

As I interpret the above quote, the First Slayer suggests that a relationship wrought with pain, motivated by forgiveness, sacrifice, and love, will bring Buffy to her “gift“. This describes her and Dawn perfectly - agreed. But it also describes her and Spike. There is as much of a case for Dawn being her “gift” as there is for Spike being it. With both relationships, Buffy had to forgive, risk the pain, love, and sacrifice (in Dawn’s case, herself, and with Spike - she had to allow him to give himself. She had to let him go.)

I’m getting a gift? Or do you mean that I have a gift to give to someone else?

Death is your gift.

So, let’s say the series had ended with “The Gift.“ Interpretation: Buffy’s “gift” was her death. She died protecting the Key. Love brought her to her gift. Her love for Dawn caused her death. Her death saved the world….sounds good, but I argue a different viewpoint. This theory works if the show has ended with “The Gift.” But it didn’t, so all bets are off, and a new interpretation emerges.

Let’s backtrack. What led Buffy to question her ability and what led her on the road to realizing and utilizing her “gift’? Or perhaps maybe we should ask why The first Slayer thought it was so important for Buffy to know what her “gift” was.

Buffy is having major doubts. She comes to Giles to ask him to be her Watcher again, and for help because she wants to learn more about her power and of the Slayers of the past, in hopes it will make her stronger and better. At the beginning of the season, Buffy is well on the way to embracing her “dark side” for lack of a better term, and accepting that part of being a Slayer is accepting and embracing the darkness inside of her. Yet, she is not a dark being. We know that. There is a confliction inside of her.

Buffy felt insecure in the idea that her only talent is her ability to maim and kill. So, instead of embracing it, she rejected it. This was her mistake. The assumption that death was a negative thing to be rejected. By rejecting death, she rejects herself. The Slayer, after all, is the ultimate Bringer of death. Death allows for life to thrive.

At the Season’s climax, Buffy is unable to stop Glory from using Dawn’s blood to open the portal, and has no choice but to jump to save her sister. Her blood is substituted for Dawn’s, and the world is restored to a balance.

Many assume that Buffy’s “gift” was death, because it was that which saved the world. I disagree. We know that love brought her to her gift, or allowed her to realize what it was and how to utilize it. We know she was wrong when she thought that her ability to kill was her gift. We know that in order to receive her “gift’ she had to “Love..give..forgive” and “risk the pain.” Her love for Dawn caused her to jump, but her jump - her death - wasn’t her gift.

In my opinion, rather than Dawn, I argue Buffy’s “gift” could just as easily been Spike, who saved the world and everyone in the end, made possible by her love for him.

After Buffy came back from the dead, she was a shell of her former self. Spike brought her out of that shell. She learned to love again. Buffy gave to Spike. Buffy loved Spike and in the end, Buffy forgave him for the unthinkable. Buffy risked the pain for Spike. She took the First Slayers advice; she risked the pain and found love again in Spike. One could argue that her love for Dawn brought her to her gift (which was her death) but there is more evidence that her ability to love brought her to Spike. Rather, Spike’s death in ‘Chosen’, made possible by love, was her real “gift.” It saved them all, including Dawn.

Let’s discuss Buffy’s two main loves in these later seasons - Dawn and Spike - and how her love for each differs. In order to better understand why it makes more sense that her love for the latter is who the First Slayer was referring too. Buffy’s love for Dawn was and is a selfless, maternal, self-sacrificing love. Dawn was Buffy’s weakness. For Dawn, Buffy gave up her mission and duty to protect her. Buffy couldn’t live in a world without Dawn. Her love for Dawn was the death of her. Therefore, her death was a gift to Dawn - because it saved her life. In contrast, Buffy did love Spike fully and completely - but she was willing to live in a world without him if it meant allowing him to bring his gift to the world - his death.

Love will bring you to your gift.

Death is your gift.

Could Spike’s death been Buffy’s “gift”? Her gift was not one she was to give to someone else - it was one she as to receive. This is my theory.

Give this some more thought. Spike got his soul for Buffy. Spike saved the world. Without his love for her and without her support, he wouldn’t have chosen to let himself burn down in the Hellmouth. Buffy’s love for Spike allowed him to give his gift - death - which allowed her, and the people she’d sworn to protect, to live. Yet, without the love she gave him he would have never had the insight or drive redeem himself and become the Champion he turned out to be.

In summary: Buffy’s “gift” was not her sister, or her death - rather, it was Spike - and by extension, his death - who she found through love, and who gave her everything he could, his flesh, heart, and soul and who, in the end, was responsible for saving them all. Her “gift” was Spike’s death.

A gift is often defined as something unexpected. Who would have thought that, in the end, Spike would be Buffy’s main source of support? Who would have believed he’d save them all in a selfless act/ Who’d have thought he would want to give her the ultimate “gift”?

Taking the last two seasons into account, Spike replaces Dawn and therefore replaces the status as her “gift.”
 
S
StarSlayer
Oops, I posted my karma under your previous post instead of this one. But again...AMAZING meta :D
Comics getting you down? Try another perspective! Here is a feast of Comic themed meta:

I believe Whedon is taking Buffy back to the beginning so she'll face that moment that damaged her. I'm appreciate the return of the Master more and more because he's the only villian to succeed in defeating Buffy--he killed her twice (in Prophecy Girl and in The Wish)--and he likewise has reason to hold a personal grudge as she killed him, but also destroyed his line by either killing them (Darla) or recruiting them to Good (Angel, Spike). It's a personal battle with fear and anger and revenge at its heart (the best kind of tension). Plus, the Master is the one who set off Buffy's death wish and was a precursor to Angel--Buffy's got to defeat the enemy that she never really buried. Sure, she smashed his bones, but his defeat of her stayed with her always (like how Darla says to Angelus when he kills his father--that death was too easy and now his father will always hold power over him). Buffy might've killed the Master, but the Master still got inside her and he's never really left.

http://angearia.livejournal.com/169785.html

So now we come to the big explanation for the Epic Silence about Spike. Why is Spike not in the dream cube space? He's real. He's available. He's scary. Deny! Deny! How does Buffy explain her thoughts about him? Great Muppity Odin, I miss that sex. Spike gets a supporting role in her sex fantasies. Why does she give Satsu a fling? Satsu, the punkish right hand person with an unrequited love for her? Spike without the actual attachment. What does she tell herself about not going after Spike? She's too busy? Sure. Everyone she loves gets hurt and runs away. He's moved on with Angel (!). Lots of reasons. She hangs on to her fantasy. In Anywhere But Here she's dreaming on the beach with a copy of The Vampire Lestat at hand. Joss has told us twice in inteviews while the comics were being written that Spike is more evolved. In one of them, he called Angel Lestat. Andrew tells Buffy that she traded up when she moved on to Spike. We get three frames on her frozen speechless reaction.

http://2maggie2.livejournal.com/24117.html
 
Thank an understatement, lol.

Agreed. But hey, look on the bright side: at least Spike's character wasn't degraded by him turning bad and calling himself Twilight as well as having universe-creating space-sex. I'd rather that role go to Angel than Spike. 😀

Btw, thanks for the meta recs, guys! Very interesting to read! 🙂
 
Back
Top Bottom