Televisionary Review

goldenboy

Scooby
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
2,497
Did you guys read this one yet? Seems like one of the more well-reasoned critical reviews so far.

Paper (Thin) Dolls: An Advance Review of Joss Whedon's "Dollhouse"

Written by Jace | Tuesday, February 10, 2009

"'The doer' is merely a fiction added to the deed "“ the deed is everything." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Joss Whedon's latest television series, Dollhouse, seeks to explore the shifting nature of identity--how we perceive ourselves and how others do--through a complex story involving a clandestine organization called the Dollhouse, which wipes the personalities of volunteers (or so we're told) and imprints them with various personas specifically selected for an array of missions or "engagements." Clients with money to burn can pay these Actives (or dolls) to engage in a variety of tasks and everything, from the criminal to the sexual, is on offer at a price.

The service is expensive, confidential, and highly exclusive (or so we're told). It's also highly illegal. Which is why the the bosses at the Dollhouse--embodied by the icy Adele DeWitt (Olivia Williams) have a particular interest in one of their Actives, Echo (Eliza Dushku), who is allegedly the best of the best (or so we're told). Once an Active completes an engagement, they're programmed to immediately return to the Dollhouse, a cross between a luxury spa, military barracks, and Wolfram & Hart, where their memories are wiped and they are returned to a fugue state.

(Still with me so far?)

Echo, unfortunately, has begun to remember things about her life before the Dollhouse and about events that transpire during her engagements. Is she becoming self-aware? Is this a good thing? Or is it placing her in grave danger? It's these questions that the early episodes of Dollhouse seek to answer as Echo unwittingly finds herself on a crash course with a dogged FBI agent named Paul Ballard (Tahmoh Penikett) who is searching for the mythical Dollhouse.

I had the opportunity to watch three of the first four episodes of Dollhouse, which launches this Friday. Longtime readers of this site will remember how I waxed enthusiastically for creator Joss Whedon's original pilot script when I read it last April. So what did I think about the finished product, which has gone through a rather, er, difficult birthing process? Let's discuss.

I'll start by saying that I loved the themes that Whedon sought to explore in his original pilot script. The notion of identity is a fascinating one and Whedon seeks to use the Actives' experiences on engagements to make a statement about the roles we all play in our daily lives, our own programming, and our own quest to understand our true natures. And these themes still exist in Dollhouse's finished product, albeit in a more jumbled and surface way. There's a nice symmetry between both Echo and Paul's quest for understanding as one seemingly seeks to escape into oblivion and the other searches in order to bring this dark thing into the light.

There are little things that I love about the series: that the Actives' codenames come from the NATO phonetic alphabet (i.e., Alpha, Echo, Sierra, Victor), the hints at some Big Bad that came out of the Dollhouse's naà¯veté and hubris (the creation of Alpha), an ambitious metaphor that's a dark mirror to our self-obsessed society, and the strength of the series' supporting cast: Olivia Williams, Dichen Lachman, Amy Acker, and Harry Lennix. (Lachman in particular is such a standout that I couldn't help but imagine what Dollhouse would be like with her as the lead.)

However, one of the main things hurting this project is its reliance on a more self-contained style of storytelling. With a concept as rich and challenging as this one, it just screams out for serialized narrative, but that apparently was never on the table at FOX, which was looking to develop a series in the same mold as Fringe: one with an overarching mythology but with episodes that wrapped up their procedural plots each week.

The result is that there's very little throughline to keep the audience invested week after week, a real major issue in a series where the series lead is in fact playing a different character from week to week as well. It's difficult to root for Echo because we know just as little about her as a character as she does herself. In the first few episodes alone, she's imprinted with the personality of a near-sighted asthmatic negotiator named Miss Penn (more on that in a bit), then she's an extreme-sports-loving girl, then she's a kick-ass master thief named Taffy in "Grey Hour." While it's interesting to watch Dushku attempt to play such a wide array of characters, it's not easy for the audience to associate with a character who's as shifting and quixotic as mercury.

And as much as I loved Dushku on Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel, I don't feel that she's able to carry off the burden of carrying a series by playing an infinite number of characters. Dushku seems to work best when she's in Bad Girl mode (i.e., Faith or Taffy) but otherwise she seems more or less to be channelling the same personality imprint the rest of the time... and she also doesn't quite pull off the "blank slate" aspect of the Actives either. (Unlike Dichen Lachman, who as Sierra, nails it in her first scene.)

Which is a shame as Dollhouse as a concept has definite potential. But there's a real messiness to the execution, which leaves itself open to significant head-scratching criticism. Why does the client, in the pilot episode, hire an Active to serve as a hostage negotiator in order to get back his kidnapped daughter... when it would be easier, not to mention cheaper and less problematic, to hire an actual negotiator? Why does the super-wealthy couple in Episode Four ("Grey Hour") hire Echo to be their midwife when they could use an actual midwife?

There are times where an Active would be the ideal candidate for a job--especially when dealing with anything illicit or illegal--but I couldn't wrap my head around these fairly innocuous assignments where other professionals would have been much more suited for the task at hand. And the fact that Topher imprints the Actives with real people's personalities--and their innate flaws--is worrisome, especially as those very flaws seem to undo Echo in the field. Miss Penn's asthma actually leads to the client getting shot and the kidnappers getting away with the kid AND the cash. This is a problem when the clients are meant to be hiring someone better than anyone in reality... why would anyone pay for a vessel that seems as cracked as this?

These Actives are supposed to be the best, embodying a Nietzschean ideal, yet three engagements go haywire when the imprints fail Echo (as in the pilot), the client isn't properly vetted (as in the second episode), or the Dollhouse's allegedly unbreachable programming is hacked (as in the fourth episode). I understand that things need to go wrong somewhat in order for there to be dramatic tension, but the Dollhouse seems so fallible on more than one occasion that it's difficult to take them seriously as a impenetrable and shadowy organization that only seems to employ one programmer (FranKranz's Topher) to imprint the dolls and where things keep going Very Wrong indeed.

Additionally, "Ghost," the series' new pilot (which was written and shot after the original was scrapped) doesn't set up the scope of Dollhouse's clientele especially well. We're shown Echo's first engagement, as a motorcycle-driving perfect date for a guy celebrating his birthday weekend, but it doesn't seem as if this guy is a multi-millionaire with the cash necessary to hire Echo for the weekend; instead he seems a run-of-the-mill frat-type who probably would have been more likely to hire a hooker than an Active with a billion-dollar personality imprint. And the Dollhouse's main adversary, Paul Ballard (Penikett) is terribly under-developed in the early episodes. We're told that he's dogged and won't back down (hell, a turgid kickboxing montage painfully proves it) and that he's not well-liked by his colleagues but that sadly seems to be the extent of his character for now. He seems as much of a blank slate as Echo or the others.

Dollhouse's second episode, entitled "The Target" (which, as Joss Whedon said last week, was meant to be the series' fifth or eighth episode), written by Steven DeKnight, is at least a step in the right direction as it features flashbacks that explore how Harry Lennix's former cop-turned handler Boyd Langton came to the Dollhouse and flesh out the Incident with rogue Active Alpha. Lennix adds some nice shading to the role and lends a much needed gravitas to the series; it's through his eyes that we see Echo emerging as a more fully developed character and it's obvious that he cares for her in his own way.

But there's definitely a kitchen sink mentality to Dollhouse that's more than a little offputting, especially as the series seems to tread water for far too long, offering up what could be construed as a series of putative pilots in its first few episodes that don't advance the characters or plot more than a few inches, rather than feet. In just the first few episodes, there is a creepy naked man, a Deadliest Game hunt, a vault heist, that kickboxing montage that seems to go on endlessly, a scarred doctor, haywire machinery, a shadowy employer, conspiracies and fabricated identities, group showers, threats of being sent up to the Dollhouse's secretive attic, etc. There are so many MacGuffins, red herrings, and technobabble thrown in to the mix and so little actual characterization that the end result is a jumbled feeling rather akin to the Actives' own mind-wiping sessions.

Ultimately, it feels as though the early episodes of Dollhouse are lacking Whedon's trademark blend of wit, humor, and emotional depth that marked his other series. Despite being intrigued by the series' overall concept initially, I found it extremely difficult to accept Dollhouse's numerous conceits and obvious flaws and, like an old moth-eaten sweater, Dollhouse seems to unravel the more you pull at the loose strings. What's sad is that if you look at it in the right light, you can see the traces of something that could have been far better constructed. A shadow or an echo, if you will, of something bolder and better.

Dollhouse premieres Friday, February 13th at 9 pm ET/PT on FOX.
Televisionary: Paper (Thin) Dolls: An Advance Review of Joss Whedon's "Dollhouse"



As far as hiring a doll for a "real world" situation and not the genuine professional that might be called for...the only thing I can think of is that they need a specific individual's skills, and that person isn't available (busy, or deceased or whatever).
 
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Joan the Vampire Slayer
Great. Thanks for posting.
But there's definitely a kitchen sink mentality to Dollhouse that's more than a little offputting, especially as the series seems to tread water for far too long, offering up what could be construed as a series of putative pilots in its first few episodes that don't advance the characters or plot more than a few inches, rather than feet.

From another thread:

For example, the first several episodes of the show will be entirely stand-alone episodes with no long-term plot developments. He referred to the first seven episodes as "the seven pilots," meaning you could watch any one of them without needing to have seen the show before.
That sounds quite disappointing. 🙁
No, it sounds like the show actually has a chance of surviving.

Now I'm even more certain that it's not a good thing!
 
I'm sure this show will suffer in the early stages, cos it's a compromise between Joss and FOX unfortunately.

Hopefully it'll last long enough to work out the kinks.
 
I don't expect a lot from the first few eps. Just let them be watchable. I'm thinking it will be like Angel Season 5, when the network stepped on them for stand-alones, and they complied with the first few, but as it progressed it got more serialised, and more interesting.
 
We'll see. It sounds like FOX is hellbent on ruining this show before it even premieres. Airing episodes out of order.....did they learn absolutely nothing from Firefly? When this gets cancelled, maybe Joss will have the good sense to work with a different network on his next project.
 
Because the ONLY thing they have had on the schedules have been Buffy, Angel, Firefly and now Dollhouse.

One: Even if they produced it, they never had Buffy or Angel on their schedules.

Two: I don't see your point. Yeah, they have other shows. Did anyone suggest otherwise? So what? That means there is no lesson to be learned from that experience? You can't take from that experience that airing a series with a potentially confusing concept out of its intended order is pretty much dooming it? I can figure that much out. Even if FOX did ignore it, Joss Whedon is working for FOX and should have taken more lessons from his experience with Firefly and gone elsewhere with this.
 
One: Even if they produced it, they never had Buffy or Angel on their schedules.

Two: I don't see your point. Yeah, they have other shows. Did anyone suggest otherwise? So what? That means there is no lesson to be learned from that experience? You can't take from that experience that airing a series with a potentially confusing concept out of its intended order is pretty much dooming it? I can figure that much out. Even if FOX did ignore it, Joss Whedon is working for FOX and should have taken more lessons from his experience with Firefly and gone elsewhere with this.

My point is that failed shows happen ALL the time, people keep harping on about Firefly as though anyone at Fox should care.
Why should they?
Fox want to make money, if something is viable they will do it, if it fails they will get rid of it.

If Joss chooses to work with them, he is the one that needs to remember what happened, Fox, quite rightly, doesn't have to give to flying fraggles.
 
My point is that failed shows happen ALL the time, people keep harping on about Firefly as though anyone at Fox should care.
Why should they?
Fox want to make money, if something is viable they will do it, if it fails they will get rid of it.

If Joss chooses to work with them, he is the one that needs to remember what happened, Fox, quite rightly, doesn't have to give to flying fraggles.

But the point is they are virtually assured not to make money by repeating the same mistakes with the previous show. If they want the show to succeed, why air it in the most confusing way possible? MY point isn't that FOX didn't have the right to cancel Firefly when it failed to attract viewers, but rather look at what went wrong and not doing the exact same thing.
 
But the point is they are virtually assured not to make money by repeating the same mistakes with the previous show. If they want the show to succeed, why air it in the most confusing way possible? MY point isn't that FOX didn't have the right to cancel Firefly when it failed to attract viewers, but rather look at what went wrong and not doing the exact same thing.

How many successful shows did it have before and after Firefly?

Its a successful company that is making money, it has no reason to focus on a failure.

If alot of its shows were failures and causing it to lose money fair game, but thats not the case.
 
I don't think them airing the first five or seven episodes out of order is going to matter AT ALL because they're all meant to be like pilots to introduce new viewers. After that is when it gets serialized. At least they're airing the pilot.

People, Kevin Reilly is the best damn thing to happen to FOX for a long time. The network is not out to ruin this show, they've done nothing but show support other than asking for a more stand-alone type of structure, and we already know the show becomes a lot more serialized halfway through. All the network bashing is a bit juvenile...if Dollhouse fails it won't be because of FOX.
 
if Dollhouse fails it won't be because of FOX.

Of course not. They've done quite a bit of promo so if people don't watch it it will be because of a range of other reasons, because it's a shit show, because they have more important things to do.. And if it's the writing, than it will fail because of Joss's crappy writing. (I so hope not, though!) But it is annoying that networks really demand so much of the writers and I can see that some writers because of all the little things a network wants them to do or not to do feel restricted and that never really helps with being creative, I'd say
 
Yeah, it's generally been getting a lot of mixed/bad reviews. I'll still watch it, though, because you won't know if you like it until you try it!
 
Reviews aside, I think I can judge for myself. I'll give Joss a chance as we all will and that's all he's asking. 😀
 
^^^^sounds like you'll have to try it seven times. What the heck? I am very interested to see how this works. I'm allready devising a score card. Forums should be pretty active with what version of echo do you like best, etc. etc.

It has many opportunities to engauge the audience if done well, if done crappy it has many chances to lose peoples intrest or confuse and befuddle them.

Wait and see, I guess.
 
Wow. OK, a more favorable take on the 1st 3 eps.

We've Seen 3 Episodes Of Joss Whedon's Dollhouse!

By Charlie Jane Anders, 9:00 AM on Thu Feb 12 2009, 255 views

Joss Whedon has always had a reputation as a feminist creator, thanks to Buffy and Firefly. But Dollhouse, launching Friday, is his most mature feminist (not to mention humanist) statement. Here's our spoiler-free preview.

I called our preview "spoiler-free," but I will go so far as to explain the basic premise of the show, which you could glean from watching the previews. In Dollhouse, Eliza Dushku plays Echo a young woman whose mind has been erased, to make her perfectly mutable.

The insanely wealthy (and a few charity cases) can hire Echo to be whoever they want - with the personality, childhood memories, and skills that they want her to have. After each "engagement," the Dollhouse wipes her memory, leaving her an empty vessel until the next client. But things go wrong with Echo's "engagements," and she also starts to remember stuff that she's not supposed to. Oh, and Dollhouse starts tomorrow night at 9 on Fox.

Now that we've watched a few episodes of Dollhouse, a few things are clear:

This is a development of the River Tam story. Long-time Joss fans will remember Firefly's River Tam (Summer Glau), a mysterious naked girl who alternated between having uncanny abilities and crazy broken-brain talk. Both the abilities and the childlike dementia came from the mysterious experiments the Alliance did on River.

Dollhouse feels very much like an expanded, and more nuanced, version of that story. You have the weird brain science, the childlike babbling, and the uncanny abilities. But there are a few differences: Echo is the show's main character, and she's not just being fashioned into some kind of super-weapon. Instead, she's transformed into an all-purpose wish-fulfillment device, the ultimate emotional panacea.

There's no Simon Tam - everybody around Echo is complicit in what's happening to her, and she's their property. (And yet, you get hints that her "Handler" Boyd cares about her, and may take on a Simon-like role at some point.) Where River Tam's story was a Girl Interrupted riff with ninja moments, Echo's is becoming something much darker, and and yet much more fun as well.

The girl-power is in there. One of our biggest fears about Dollhouse, going into it, is that Echo's just a puppet. She's not a real person, she's just a braindead non-entity. So if she kicks ass, it's because she's been programmed with ass-kicking skills, that aren't really hers.

Except the show neatly sidesteps that pitfall - Echo often exceeds her programming and kicks more ass than she's supposed to. She's not programmed to be a super-ninja in every episode, and her "engagements" usually go wrong in some unforeseen way. At that point, she has to find reserves of strength and courage inside herself, and it's beautiful to behold.

It's all a metaphor for how you're brainwashed in real life. The show doesn't bludgeon you with how deep and metaphorical it is, but that stuff is all there if you look. The people that Echo is programmed to become have childhoods, they have little quirks and extra neuroses that aren't strictly necessary for them to do the job. Echo's relationship with her handler, Boyd, is almost a father-daughter one, partly because of her programming. And squirming beneath the surface is a sense that all of us non-programmed people have our social roles imposed on us, just as much as Echo does. Plus we're all playthings of the rich, just like she is.

Nobody on this show is whom they seem, exactly. And going along with that theme of "everybody's brainwashed," nobody on this show is who we think they are - or even, necessarily, who they they they are. Everyone seems to have secrets, and stuff they're hiding even from themselves.

Every episode is going to be a cult movie. Without giving away the plots of any of the episodes, I can tell you they're all cult movies. Some of them are classy cult movies - the kind that would star Denzel Washington, George Clooney or Meg Ryan - and some of them are more like decent B-movies. But every episode is self-contained, at least in the first batch, and it feels like a mini-movie. Every week, someone hires Echo to be someone new, and somehow the situation turns into a kinked-out thriller. Not that any of the episodes I saw were campy at all. They were more like tense, sparky crime movies or girl-in-the-woods movies.

By the way, there's a meme going around that the show's second episode is way better than the first. I actually liked both episodes about equally. But if the first episode leaves you flat, you should try the second, just in case you agree with the people who preferred it.

This is an incredible ensemble cast. Your feelings about Eliza Dushku are inevitably going to color your opinion of Dollhouse - especially since the show calls on her to play a huge range of different characters. (Personally, I thought she was good most of the time, with a few moments of greatness and a few minor false notes.) But in any case, the show also boasts an incredible supporting cast.

We all expected Battlestar Galactica's Tahmoh Penikett to rule as FBI agent Paul Ballard, but he's actually way better than he was as Helo. In the early episodes, Paul is just sniffing the trail of the Dollhouse, but Penikett manages to keep his dead-end investigation riveting. Also, Fran Kranz is great as Topher, the show's "Xander," who programs Echo with a new personality every week. Kranz gets most of the show's Whedonesque dialogue, and makes the most of it. And Harry Lennix and Olivia Williams are also captivating. Oh, and the brother from Journeyman? He's in it too, which I didn't even realize, and he's a dick. In a good way.

Bottom line: I've already totally fallen in love with this show. I was excited for it before I saw it, and now that I have, I am filled with a fevered desperation to watch a hundred more episodes. I wish I had a half-dozen DVD box sets of this show.
Dollhouse: We've Seen 3 Episodes Of Joss Whedon's Dollhouse!
 
"And then there's Dushku the muse - the actress who inspired the series Whedon built around her. Obviously he sees something in her. But will viewers? That's a lot of faith."


Lol was that last part from the TV Review article a pun?
 
Back
Top Bottom