The 1969 moon landing was faked

Anyanka Bunny Slayer

✨ Hail Hydra ✨
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
13,814
Black Thorn
Only after many years of thinking about this have I realised the truth. There is NO way the "moon landing" actually occurred. I mean, c'mon now. Talk about a hoax! Notice the separate light sources in the photo...when there should be only one; the sun. And is that flag supposed to be blowing in the wind, when there is none?

We are a gullible lot, no?


ac3714d8ec13a204c6cd682fe7604d62.jpg
 
I have out most respect for people who suscribes to the idea that it was fake!😛 Its just not something I buy into. The points you raised could have very simple explanations. I don't think they alone are strong enough as evidence.

I just don't see why they would fake the Moon landing. And even if they had I'm pretty sure the truth would have come out by now. Or at least there would have been more people claiming that the landing was fake than there are.
 
Anyanka Bunny Slayer
Anyanka Bunny Slayer
Waiting for simple explanations. :P
So, these pratts who say the moon landing was fake, believe in God do they, believe in the preachings of the churches do they.
 
And is that flag supposed to be blowing in the wind, when there is none?

The flag was originally just suspended from a straight rod at the top, because, obviously, there is no wind on the moon. The astronauts didn't like the way that that looked, so they bent the top wire, making the flag look like it was ruffling in the (non-existent) breeze. It was all just poetic license, not any attempt at a hoax. The lunar landings were 100% authentic.

On the other hand, the first Mars Rover was discovered and destroyed by a tribe of indigenous nomads known as Tharks. M R 1 managed to send back one usable image before the signal was abruptly cut off:

http://media.npr.org/assets/img/201...37d7bfbb7fac6d86ef1ff0a65dfb102c-s300-c85.jpg
 
First off that first photo shadows are a trick of perception due to the angle of the photograph. Secondly the moon does rotate, but slowly thus appearing not to. It's called a synchronous rotation.
 
There were three groups of people who would know whether the American landed on the moon in 1969; the Americans (obviously), the Brits (who- at that time- had a powerful telescope pointing in that general direction) and....the USSR!(who had already sent things to the moon and consequently could observe all the goings on up there)

Now, at the height of the Cold War do we really think that the US would make up a huge propaganda victory and the Ruskies would just...let them have it. Nope. They would've known one way or the other whether the Americans had succeeded and absolutely exposed a hoax.

And that's just basic politics.

All the bullsh*t 'science' reasons for the fake pictures are just that- bullsh*t. These so-called experts don't understand how light works for instance, or the fact that on the moon the earth becomes a light source...
 
thetopher,
not to mention which country received then distributed the signals from the moon.
That photo by ABK at #7 is obviously a fake how can they write where the landing site was and show them walking on the moon. And white avenger we know the Mars Rover was not destroyed by Tharks. It was bogged by him in 'The Big Bang Theory' when he did get it going it was done-in by one of Megatrons boys.
 
Yeah, just add debunked on the google search and perfectly fine explanations to all these random "evidence" will show up.
Often written by people with a lot better credentials than your usual conspiracy theory maniac.

The problem is that usually people will only believe in the things that suits there agenda.
Common sense and actual proof are so easily ignored.

/SK
 
There's the principle of triangulation which allows us to locate the origins of electromagnetic waves. Long story short, the soviets didn't call out a hoax because they actually could see from where the radio signal was coming from. Suprise, surprise... it came from the moon.

Sooooooo... I know there're some folks that also believe in conspiracy theories about the U.S. being in cahoot with the soviets to oppress... somebody for... some reason. 😵
 
The last Moon landing was obviously a fake.
And the reality of the situation was such that Russia deliberately avoided making any comment, as it would have appeared to be supportive of NASA successfully making a manned flight and landing on Mars.
 
I can't even with this thread.

CjAh0.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom