It always frustrated me the whole "out you go Buffy" scene. I mean I got why the Potentials might blame her; they're new to the whole thing and they're scared to death and they don't realise that there is no blame in these situations, that nothing is for certain and that there will always be casualties. It still annoyed me, but I got it.
What I hated was when her nearest and dearest seemed to side with the Potentials too and think Faith would be a better leader. They of all people should have known that when in an entirely new situation fighting something they have very little clue about, Buffy had done the best she could, and that she had never failed them in the previous seven years. She always put them and the world before herself; she'd sacrificed herself twice, killed Angel, gave up her Prom to ensure they all had one (though admittedly she still got prom time in the end)' and numerous other things that I know happened but can't recall specifics right now. So where was their loyalty? Especially Dawn. This was a sister that literally gave everything for her. Even if they thought Buffy had started making bad decisions, Faith didn't have the best history in decision making AT ALL, so why suddenly make the leap and illogical decision that Faith would be better. Better the devil you know and all?
Faith, however, in this scene struck me as someone who found herself the focus of attention rather reluctantly but opted to go with the flow rather than fight it.
Actually, there is blame in this situation. Yeah, sure, Caleb physically killed the potentials, yet they wouldn't have been killed if Buffy just actually researched them. What Buffy did was completely reckless and unforgivable. She led two girls who was her responsibility to their deaths. The fact that she didn't even know what Caleb looked like, what he was capable of is just... gob smacking. In Surprise, imagine if she brought the whole scooby gang to meet the judge. But it was okay then, as it was just her and Angel, and the whole entire purpose was to just see whether or not the judge was activated, if dru and spike were still alive, etc.
Also... the whole 'she died twice, gave up everything' doesn't fly... at all. All of those things are great and merit respect, but that does not translate into great leadership skills or ability to conjure up effective tactics. Whenever people mention 'loyalty' it always annoys me, because I always get the impression that people think that Buffy is somewhat entitled to absolutely everything she wants to do. Dawn isn't in Buffy's debt or anything. Especially, when siding with Buffy could mean more people were going to die.
Yes, people are going to die. That's a fact in war. Well, let's keep that number down to a very small minimum, and the whole 'people are going to die' is a horrible, nihilistic excuse. I hated Spike in Touched when he said that.
Faith being a leader, does show the limits of the potential's thinking, that in order to fight a war, there needs to be a singular leader who is the physically strongest. I think Giles would make a brilliant leader, with his watcher instincts. Xander, Willow are great at researching, knowledge, planning, brainstorming, etc. I would have opted for a joint leadership, or perhaps a non- Slayer at the helm.
Gile's was the only person who had actually been trained to lead someone, Buffy never really led the scoobies, she did not have seven years of leading, she had seven years of working alone, and occasionally directing her friends on rare occasions. Also, season 1, 2 and most of 3, she was a follower, she obeyed (to some extent) Giles/Wesley. So realistically she had season 4/5/6 as a leader. She was the worst leader in season 4, her group literally fell apart, in season 5 she fell apart and she did nothing in season 6 due to her depression. So why should everyone follow Buffy? There's no clear reason that I can see? Whereas, Giles has led people, has made difficult decisions and is literally willing to do whatever it takes to save the world.
Buffy would not even kill ben to save the wolrd, which was very noble and all but could have led to the end of the world and uber suffering. She did kill angel, but only after he'd killed scores of people, and had to be killed to stop a portal sucking the world into hell... if it had been Jenny who had reverted to an immensely evil creature, does anyone doubt that Giles would have stabbed in the heart a lot sooner than buffy did angel, cos I don't.
To have Giles step in and take command in Season 7 would have flown in the face of what he had been drilling into Buffy's head for the previous several seasons, and why he left in the middle of Season 6. Buffy was the leader. She shouldn't depend on anyone else, Giles included, to make the difficult decisions, either in her life, or in her Slaying. Buffy was SUPPOSED to be the one in charge, That's why she broke away from the Council, and why Giles encouraged and supported her afterwards. Guarding the hellmouth was Buffy's responsibility, and that included being the one in charge, That was the whole premise of the show, and why her name is part of the series title.
Everyone wants to condemn Buffy for her "plan" to return a second time to the vineyard, but the fact is, no one even knows specifically what that plan would have involved. We never knew, because no one bothered to hear her out, even when she said that she was willing to discuss strategy. What we DO know is that, as someone else pointed out, she was spot on. What Caleb was guarding WAS at the vineyard, and, ultimately, it was worth the sacrifice required to attain it.
Ironically, in order to establish her leadership of the Potentials, Faith did exactly what Buffy should have done in the first place. She pointed out that she (Faith) was the one giving the orders, and that those objecting should "back the hell off and let her do her job," And that's why the Potentials were willing to follow Faith into that tunnel. She established from the first that she was the one in charge, the one giving the orders, and their jobs were to follow her in and watch her back. Basically, Faith gave the classic "My way or the highway," speech, and the Potentials believed her. Just that simple.
ultimately, it was worth the sacrifice required to attain it.
e.
Obviously it wasn't considering that no sacrifice was needed at all to get the scythe, because as made evident by what actually happened, Buffy could have gotten it herself without the use of the potentials as canon fodder
To have Giles step in and take command in Season 7 would have flown in the face of what he had been drilling into Buffy's head for the previous several seasons, and why he left in the middle of Season 6. Buffy was the leader. She shouldn't depend on anyone else, Giles included, to make the difficult decisions, either in her life, or in her Slaying. Buffy was SUPPOSED to be the one in charge, That's why she broke away from the Council, and why Giles encouraged and supported her afterwards. Guarding the hellmouth was Buffy's responsibility, and that included being the one in charge, That was the whole premise of the show, and why her name is part of the series title.
Everyone wants to condemn Buffy for her "plan" to return a second time to the vineyard, but the fact is, no one even knows specifically what that plan would have involved. We never knew, because no one bothered to hear her out, even when she said that she was willing to discuss strategy. What we DO know is that, as someone else pointed out, she was spot on. What Caleb was guarding WAS at the vineyard, and, ultimately, it was worth the sacrifice required to attain it.
Ironically, in order to establish her leadership of the Potentials, Faith did exactly what Buffy should have done in the first place. She pointed out that she (Faith) was the one giving the orders, and that those objecting should "back the hell off and let her do her job," And that's why the Potentials were willing to follow Faith into that tunnel. She established from the first that she was the one in charge, the one giving the orders, and their jobs were to follow her in and watch her back. Basically, Faith gave the classic "My way or the highway," speech, and the Potentials believed her. Just that simple.
Maybe if Buffy had kept the rocket launcher she was using to try to kill Principal Wood in "Him", things would have gone better.
As for the Seal of Danzalthar, get a gasoline truck (everyone had left town by this point, even in the hospital, so no one would have missed it), pump it into the cavern and light it.
If the army had bugged out of the military base that Xander got into to get the rocket launcher used against the Judge in "Innocence", a whole set of weaponry would have been just lying around unused.
The town had evacuated. It was empty, just like the hospital when Anya and Andrew pillaged it. All items in the town were at their disposal. They used none of it. When the amateur thinks tactics, the professional tactician thinks logistics.
You're confusing the term "worth the sacrifice" with "required a sacrifice." Maybe Buffy could have gone in alone and gotten the Scythe the first time, but we'll never know for sure. Or just as likely, the knowledge of how Caleb fought, gained from that first encounter, was essential to the success of Buffy's second assault on the vineyard. In that second encounter, Buffy was able to use her superior Caleb's greater strength. Without the knowledge gained from their first meeting, her chances of success the second time would have been much less.
Also... it seems that you have illustrated how there was no need for the potentials to go with her a second time, if she already knew about his strength and how she could overcome it, then what good would taking the potentials with her do? Surely, they would just get in the way... how would she have gotten past him with lots of potentials running around getting killed, it's not as if she could just leave them to be slaughtered, or do you think that was her plan, to literally sacrifice them as a distraction whilst she looked around for something that may or may not have been there?