I am starting this thread on behalf of a BB member who prefers to remain nameless at this time. I want to highlight straightaway that this is a very personal topic and there is a genuine request for advice and or help on the part of the member. If your only reason for posting is to insult or condemn the member I suggest finding a thread elsewhere on the boards to take part in.
The BB member is formerly a member of the Armed Forces, and the Department of Defense has currently begun collecting money from the member's husband's tax returns and rebates on behalf of the member, for loss of pay and unreturned/damaged equipment. The member has coordinating documents to prove that she returned all equipment at outprocessing, and that the "loss of pay" was suppossed to be while she was still in service.
The details explaining the loss of pay are as follows: The member had an Article 15 issued at military trial specifying that she recieve 45 days of extra duty and 45 of lost pay. She also lost her rank and was issued an honorable discharge from service.
The Article 15 recieved at trial was in addition to a prior Article 15 for "failure to follow a direct order to stay in her assigned barracks". (The same barracks room where the member was raped.) The second for "falsifying an official statement. "(the reason she was ordered not to leave her barracks room)
The"official statement" that she got the charges for, would be that a rape took place.
I want to stress that fact that the member was raped, but too escape the pressure of dealing with the rape emotionally and the definition of ONE CID (Criminal Investigations Department) for the Armed forces investigator, she recanted. The CID's investigators definition of rape was as follows: "that rape entailed being tied up, beaten, or having a gun to your head or knife to your throat."
Fortunately for the member, she was not rapped in the manner in which the CID investigator described. She knew her attacker and she was simply paralyzed from shock and fear to fight him off, while she did plead for him to stop.
The total days of loss pay and extra duty combined from both Article 15's of lost equaled 90 days or 3 months time. The member was chaptered out of the military within 2 weeks of her second Article 15 sentencing term. She recieved no additonal pay from the military after discharge and recieved no pay prior during her sentencing term while still in service. The "Loss pay" the Department of Defense is trying to collect now is for the days she had remaining in her sentencing term after her discharge took place, and has compiled 7 years of additional interest! Basically, the Department of Defense is treating the situation like a fine instead of suspened pay, and she is being forced to pay back money she never recieved.
Seven years have passed since the attack and the member's discharge form the Armed Forces, the member has attended counselling to help move past this traumatic series of events and regained control of her life, only to suffer financially now for money she does not feel she owes. The question is simply this, does she let the Department of Defense take the money and feel victimized again by them or does she attempt to fight it?
Is it worth the emotional turmoil court will bring her for a chance at justice? and more imortantly, Does she stand any real chance of winning in court?
If the member feels that someone has posted something that could be of real benefit to her she may choose to contact you through PM. Please maintain her wishes and keep the matter private.
Thank You,
Keanoite.
The BB member is formerly a member of the Armed Forces, and the Department of Defense has currently begun collecting money from the member's husband's tax returns and rebates on behalf of the member, for loss of pay and unreturned/damaged equipment. The member has coordinating documents to prove that she returned all equipment at outprocessing, and that the "loss of pay" was suppossed to be while she was still in service.
The details explaining the loss of pay are as follows: The member had an Article 15 issued at military trial specifying that she recieve 45 days of extra duty and 45 of lost pay. She also lost her rank and was issued an honorable discharge from service.
The Article 15 recieved at trial was in addition to a prior Article 15 for "failure to follow a direct order to stay in her assigned barracks". (The same barracks room where the member was raped.) The second for "falsifying an official statement. "(the reason she was ordered not to leave her barracks room)
The"official statement" that she got the charges for, would be that a rape took place.
I want to stress that fact that the member was raped, but too escape the pressure of dealing with the rape emotionally and the definition of ONE CID (Criminal Investigations Department) for the Armed forces investigator, she recanted. The CID's investigators definition of rape was as follows: "that rape entailed being tied up, beaten, or having a gun to your head or knife to your throat."
Fortunately for the member, she was not rapped in the manner in which the CID investigator described. She knew her attacker and she was simply paralyzed from shock and fear to fight him off, while she did plead for him to stop.
The total days of loss pay and extra duty combined from both Article 15's of lost equaled 90 days or 3 months time. The member was chaptered out of the military within 2 weeks of her second Article 15 sentencing term. She recieved no additonal pay from the military after discharge and recieved no pay prior during her sentencing term while still in service. The "Loss pay" the Department of Defense is trying to collect now is for the days she had remaining in her sentencing term after her discharge took place, and has compiled 7 years of additional interest! Basically, the Department of Defense is treating the situation like a fine instead of suspened pay, and she is being forced to pay back money she never recieved.
Seven years have passed since the attack and the member's discharge form the Armed Forces, the member has attended counselling to help move past this traumatic series of events and regained control of her life, only to suffer financially now for money she does not feel she owes. The question is simply this, does she let the Department of Defense take the money and feel victimized again by them or does she attempt to fight it?
Is it worth the emotional turmoil court will bring her for a chance at justice? and more imortantly, Does she stand any real chance of winning in court?
If the member feels that someone has posted something that could be of real benefit to her she may choose to contact you through PM. Please maintain her wishes and keep the matter private.
Thank You,
Keanoite.