Tru Calling

Pop culture, Christianity converge (Tru Calling mention)

Pop culture, Christianity converge (TC mention)

This Easter, Jesus is having a moment. Of course, he has always been in homes and hearts, but now he's king of amazon.com, a hot seller at Urban Outfitters, and making appearances on Madonna's wardrobe.

That we're consumed with Christ shouldn't seem surprising. This is his holiday, after all. But during this commercial frenzy of plastic eggs, Peeps and frilly pink dresses, it is.

Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ continues its $300 million box-office spree; the book series Left Behind remains untouchably popular; and the religious mystery The Da Vinci Code is the best-selling book in Arizona on amazon.com (Producer Ron Howard has a film version on the way).

On the newsstand, Jesus is the cover of Time, the debate in the New Republic, and the big headline on the April 5 issue of People, which asks "Does Hollywood have faith?" At the theater, previews are screening for Saved!, a Mandy Moore comedy that questions: "Are you down with G-O-D?" In hip shops, like Urban Outfitters on Tempe's Mill Avenue, shirts that declare "Jesus is My Homeboy" sit near miniskirts and tube tops (Madonna wears "Mary is my Homegirl").

And religious-product sales are projected to hit $8 billion this year, up from $5.7 billion in 1999, according to MarketResearch.com.

Now, conversation over the cubicles flits from that darn line at Honeybaked Ham to the Crucifixion scenes from The Passion. At lunch, there may be a quick click to spirituality.com, where people discuss Left Behind.

Of course, it's not that America has suddenly discovered Jesus. Gallup polls consistently have reported that 90 percent of Americans believe in a higher power. But leave it to Hollywood to make him hip.

Jesus the Savior meets Jesus the Homeboy is a concept some find offensive and irreverent, but others argue that talking about God in any form is a change for the better, even if it means wearing faith on T-shirt sleeves.

"Pop culture and Christian culture have lined up and are asking similar questions at the same time," says Daniel Richards, a priest at St. Michael and All Angels Episcopal Church in Tucson. "It's created a peak in interest" in God, he says.

Questions that have come from The Passion - - this week Time asks, "Why did Jesus have to die?" - have created a lot of the fervor, he says. But America has been buzzing about Jesus and religion for a while: The gay-marriage debate, the Catholic priest scandals, and prayers for soldiers in the Iraqi war have brought faith to the media forefront.

And there's a history here. Jesus' last big pop-culture moment was during the Vietnam War when posters of a hippie Christ popped up everywhere and Jesus Christ Superstar ruled stages and movie theaters. Jesus is everywhere now, says Bob Hodgson of the American Bible Society in New York, because of events that have been building over the past few years. After all, Brad Pitt was wearing that "Homeboy" tee and people were reading Da Vinci long before Passion was on the cover of People.

"Part of it is anxiety surrounding Sept. 11, the ongoing security threats to our nation, a lagging economy - all that hard news traditionally brings people back to their faith," Hodgson says.

As for treating Christ casually, well, Tucson pastor Richards wears a "Jesus Surfs Without a Board" shirt from Urban Outfitters, where you can also find a Jesus action figure and Pope-on-a-Rope soap.

"If Jesus is so reverent that we can't laugh about him, then Jesus isn't in our everyday lives," says Richards, 28. "One of the great losses in Passion is there's no sense of humor, no lightness. All you get is the violence of Jesus' death removed from his life, which has funny moments, awkward moments, sensual moments."

But when it comes to being king of the mall, other religious scholars wonder, what would Jesus do? Undoubtedly, he'd want it to stop, they say.

In the Bible, Jesus drove all the market people out of the temple, angry that religion had been turned into a commercial enterprise, notes Jim Farrelly, director of film studies at the University of Dayton in Ohio, a Roman Catholic university.

"That seems to be what's going on now," says Farrelly. "It trivializes the sacred while at the same time exalting the profane - 'love of money is the root of all evil' stands as a warning to all those who exploit religion for their own monetary gain."

At ShareThePassionoftheChrist.com, people are buying the works: mugs emblazoned with the cross, lapel pins in Aramaic, and sterling silver nails strung on necklaces for $50.

For some, those are artifacts of faith, but, says Farrelly, they're also worn by "people who like to stand out as knowing what's hip at the moment."

And when it comes to "being down with G-O-D," hanging with the homeboy, and all of that, Farrelly says, "what they've done is make religion into something that they are comfortable with.

"People want to go to church and experience what they might at a rock concert. How can you then see your connection to something supernatural or divine when you're making everything into a natural or ordinary experience?"

Teens feel comfortable with Jesus at Journeys in Phoenix's Metrocenter mall, where teens snap up $74 Phat Farm sneakers along with $24 Jesus-decorated shirts that say "Passionate."

Jesus has a slot on prime time now, where a number of fictional hit TV shows, from Joan of Arcadia to Tru Calling, talk God and religion in one way or another.

And Jesus is at the office, too. At Screensavers.com, he's enjoying increased popularity at No. 5 on the celebrity download list, just below Johnny Depp.

And did you know that he can rap, too? At River of Life Tabernacle in Phoenix, Christian rappers meet to worship and spin lyrics about Christ. They just finished their first hip-hopera, The One, about Jesus reclaiming hip-hop from Satan. So popular, it will be reenacted in June. Listen as rappin' Christ takes on Satan: "You're a stumblin' block, building up then breaking down, stealing hopes and dreams from my peeps."

You can giggle or get upset, but River of Life associate pastor Mike Sims explains: "I myself have never been a great fan of hip-hop, but I recognize the opportunity to reach people who respond to this music."

Tempe's Vocab Malone, a Christian rapper who helped write The One, says putting the message of Christ to music can make it easier for young people, from tweens to 20-somethings, to understand.

"I don't want to take Jesus and turn him into a cool fad," says Malone, 26, whose non-rap name is John-Mark Rieser. "God is God, he is who is, and he is gonna permeate everything I do."

After all, artists have long chosen religion as a subject. In their day, Mozart's Coronation Mass and Michelangelo's The Creation of Adam were considered cutting-edge religious art.

So the idea behind Christian rap is "nothing new," says Malone, who hopes that Jesus the Savior and Jesus the Homeboy can find some middle ground.

"I hope that people don't make (Jesus) all untouchable and silly, I hope that's not the perception of Christ," he says. "But I hope they don't make him into some modern type of hippie that walks around talking about peace and love. The place to really find him is in the scriptures."

And maybe all of this is just Americans thinking too hard.

Phoenix middle-schooler Kasey Judd, 14, wears her "Jesus is My Homeboy" hat to school and softball and church. Sure, she considers Jesus a friend and is faithful, but mostly, her reason is this:

"I like wearing hats and it's a trucker hat and there's pink writing and pink's my favorite color."


Source
 
Once more..some of these articles are pretty funny..As there's literally one sentence bout TC..Still thanx for posting🙂
 
That was a lot to read lol. I can't wait until it starts let alone the finale
 
Eliza's Tru Calling: Download a Complete Scene!

Eliza's Tru Calling: Download a Complete Scene!

Fox has released a brand new clip of Tru Calling with a scene between Eliza and Jason Priestley.

Click Here
1081505418.jpg


Source
 
Thanks for posting the clip. Being in the UK we're only upto the third episode, so Jason's character hasn't been introduced yet. He seems to be quite interresting and I got the impression that Davis didn't like him.
 
I wasn't too keen on Jason joining the show, but I have to say I like what they've done with his character! This week's finale should be really good! And that's all I'll say! 😉
 
Tru Calling Season Finale Ratings

Tru Calling Season Finale Ratings

How did D.O.A and Two Weddings and a Funeral fare against the likes of "Friends" and "Survivor"?

-Yesterday's Losers:
Tru Calling (Fox), Steve Harvey's Big Time (WB), Steven King's Kingdom Hospital (ABC), Jamie Kennedy Experiment (WB), Primetime Thursday (ABC)

In season (or series) finale news, a two-hour edition of Fox's struggling Tru Calling lived up to that description, finishing a distant third in the overnights (3.6/ 5), viewers (4.43 million) and adults 18-49 (1.9/ 5) from 8-10 p.m. Even so, you have to give credit to Fox for introducing a new scripted hour opposite Friends and Survivor and sticking with it all season. That's the way you program a network.






SOURCE
 
I think the ratings should have been much better. That was the best two hours of television I've ever seen in my life. It even beats out "Chosen" in my book.
 
I really liked it too, although it didn't hit me quite as hard as it did Hero.

When Tru Calling first started I remember thinking to myself, "Yeah, it's kind of fun, but where can they go with it?"

Now that I see where they're going with it, I'm thinking "Wow. This is wild. I want to see more of this."

Which makes me think, "Oh no. Don't think like that, because everytime you think that way, they cancel the show".
 
I thought the season finale of Tru was just incredible. I also wondered where it was going to go, how were these character's stories going to develop in what seemed to be a "monster of the week" theme.

Well WOW they have done a wonderful job.

As for the ratings, I hardly think it's fair to pit it up agains a series that has been a fan favourite for a decade, in the season it's ending. Just stupid.
 
No offense to any of you, but personally I thought the show wasn't very good at all ..The reason I say this, is because a few years back, maybe a little longer, Fox already did this show, but instead of a female lead it was a male lead.. I tried giving it a chance just cause of Eliza, but I couldn't do it, Hopefully now that the show is canceled we can seriously start talking a Faith Spinoff..
 
Hero said:
I think the ratings should have been much better. That was the best two hours of television I've ever seen in my life. It even beats out "Chosen" in my book.

Yea...I definitely agree with Hero on this...It was an amazing episode...two of the best hours of television...I mean..THE ENDING! It totally surprised me. I think I stared at the TV in shock for like 10 minutes....

nerd4hire said:
Now that I see where they're going with it, I'm thinking "Wow. This is wild. I want to see more of this."

Which makes me think, "Oh no. Don't think like that, because everytime you think that way, they cancel the show".

I know what you mean...that always happens to me...why do all the shows I like get cancelled... ::bsad:: ::bsad::
 
I've seen the whole season in America. I have 17 out of the 20 episodes on tape. I just finished watching the season finale. I hate her Dad...

It's doubtful that Tru Calling will be coming back for a second season. If it doesn't, I'm gunna start a virtual season 2. Would anyone like to help out?
 
Jack vs. Tru: Which Is the Lesser of Two Evils?

Jack vs. Tru: Which Is the Lesser of Two Evils?

Most people think Tru Calling is rather simple, and uninteresting. But here's an article that says different.



by Forgotten Conscience

Okay, here we go. Tru Calling is great. I really like the show, I've always liked the show even when people said it was crap I liked it. But after seeing the finale I must say I finally understand some of the many levels of the show, and as such have written this article about Tru Calling in an attempt to perhaps make others feel the same way.

The thing that popped out at me the most was the whole Tru vs. Jack scenario. This has so many levels. First off the obvious good vs. evil and who exactly is the evil one is a great question to ask and always works if it's done correctly (which it does in this instance). Tru's actions can be considered good for the most part concerning the "body" she has to save but what about her actions involving her own life? She uses her abilities to make her life better by heading disastrous events in her friends and family's lives off at the pass this could be considered selfish and therefore not entirely honorable. Not befitting of a "hero". This could be explained though in that Tru's desire to help people doesn't stop with those she wants to help, she also wants to help the living as we see in D.O.A. (the first of the two hour finale). Tru chose to help the people in the doctor's life because she couldn't save the doctor's life and because the doctor said "Help them" instead of "Help me". These people are still alive and yet Tru chooses to help them anyway even though they weren't supposed to die on that particular day.

Jack on the other hand does not use his powers to help people in his life, but that could also be because he has no people that we can see to help. No reason to make any life but his own better. However we
haven't actually seen him use his power to make his own life better (i.e. win the lottery, win at horse racing, etc.) which is not to say he hasn't we just haven't seen him do it. Nevertheless, he hasn't made any selfish decisions that we've seen to make his life better.

If he wasn't making sure people stayed dead he could be considered a "good person" for being that selfless. Also, the reporter situation, although clearly we find out later that his purpose is to make sure people who were supposed to die actually die, when Jack tells the reporter where to find Tru so that she'll go to the diner and get killed that actually would've worked in Tru's favor. Without the reporter to expose Tru's secret (which she apparently is still intent on doing after her last appearance) Tru could continue her work without harassment by people. This action though considered wrong when you consider what Jack's motive actually was, could be considered the good or the right thing. He may be doing the "wrong" thing but it's possible that sometimes he's doing it for the right reasons.

The ripple effect, it was brought up many times this season and with good reason. Jack believes that keeping someone alive who should be dead causes ripples in the universe's design and causes changes that affect it. He is not wrong. It has been said so many times in shows where time travel was possible that changing events could have negative and/or positive consequences. If you go back in time and
save someone who originally was supposed to die that person's life changes dramatically and all the people that person comes into contact with, which they've said, but what they haven't gone into detail about is what those changes might be. If Tru saves a kid and that kid grows up to become the next Hitler its Tru's fault. If Tru saves someone and that someone makes a decision that kills hundreds of innocent lives its Tru's fault because she changed destiny. Tru may be able to save those lives whose deaths were her fault, but she wouldn't have had to save those lives if she had let that one person die and stay dead.

Though in my own personal opinion it is clear that Jack is the `evil' one his power MUST stem from a good place. Why would a person be able to relive days and have dead people ask him for help if he was chosen to make sure that person died? Jack made a choice somewhere along the line to cause people's deaths rather than prevent them, perhaps when his sister died of a disease (as he mentioned early on), or perhaps when he was nearly killed trying to save a little boy's life (though it is possible that he might've made those stories up to get people to trust him). Either way some event pushed him to elieve that he was chosen to ensure people die. Chances are it was someone close to him because as you may have noticed, Tru seems entirely certain she was chosen to help people, especially since Luc was killed or at least I got that impression from the way the season finale ended, so one could suppose that a similar event happened in Jack's life to make him take the opposite side.

It is possible however that Jack's purpose is simply to be the opposite of Tru, or vice versa. Tru may be life and Jack may be death but if we follow the mirror image concept it could have easily been the other way around. Tru said herself that if she had gone to a doctor and said she thought she was reliving days the doctor would've thought she was crazy too. She could've been Jack if circumstances had been different, and the same is true for Jack. If Jack had not told anyone about his ability and had someone like Davis to help him understand his ability Jack could've been life and Tru would've been death.

Now if we look deeper into the Tru vs. Jack concept we see that the show is also about connecting to people. Tru for all intents and purposes has to get into the lives of those she saves in order to keep them alive. She has to become at the very least the person's friend to help them resolve whatever it is that causes their deaths. Knowing their futures and seeing the day's events unfold gives her a unique perspective on how events in people's lives can lead to their deaths.

However Jack doesn't do that. Jack as far as we've seen has only gotten into Tru's life in order to affect Tru's work in saving people's lives. He has not made a connection to any of the "victims" or gotten to know them at all. Perhaps to stop himself from seeing the person behind the "body" and therefore forcing him to help that person because of his ability. Jack tries to keep events unfolding the way they did as much as possible because he knows that if that day unfolds the same way that the person who was "meant to die" will die and therefore is simply a body and not a person who needs help. It was said before Guardez left that Guardez sees dead bodies whereas Tru sees the people they "used to be". The same can be said for Jack's way of thinking.

Now, if we look deeper into Jack's actions we see that in the beginning Jack attempted to make Harrison's life worse by affecting Harrison's relationship with Lindsay and Tru's by subverting Luc's
ability to move in next door to Tru. Perhaps this was an attempt to make Tru's life so hectic that she couldn't save the people she has chosen to help? It is in Tru's nature to help those in need of help, and if her friends and families lives were messed up Tru may have to spend more time helping their lives and perhaps not save those she believes she's supposed to help. She is after all fighting time when the day restarts as well as all those things which she was supposed to do that day and instead she must put aside her own life in order to help the lives of others.

It is also apparently a "family business" of sorts. If Tru's parents could both relive days and then passed it on to Tru, then who exactly is Jack? Could he be a relative of Tru? We'll have to wait and see. However if it is a "family business" then that would have to mean that Tru's parents were related in some way other than being married, which either wouldn't make sense or would just be really gross. It is entirely possible that either Tru's father's family could also relive days and that's how he's able to do it, or that Tru's father was simply chosen to be the opposite of Tru's mother to balance out the universe as Jack was chosen for Tru.

Also, if Tru's parents passed their ability on to Tru then isn't it also possible that all of Tru's siblings have the potential to have this ability as well? Not only Harrison and Meredith but Tru's step siblings from her father's other marriage as well. Which leads to the question of whether Tru's step mother knows about Tru and her father's apparent abilities? Tru's step mother did ask Tru to "Stop him" instead of "Help me" when she died. It may be that Tru's step mother wasn't talking about the man who killed her at all it might be Tru's father she asked Tru to stop. But again we must simply wait and see.

And lastly, as far as we know all the "evil leapers" (Jack and Tru's father) are men, and all the "good leapers" we know of were women (Tru and Tru's mother). This to me sorta suggests a battle of the
sexes of sorts, men vs. women and all that.

So to answer the question posed above. Is it good vs. evil or good vs. good? Clearly this show is not black and white. There are no clear good guys and no clear bad guys. Jack may be choosing to be
death and Tru may be choosing to be life, but Jack isn't evil. He simply sees things from a different perspective than Tru. To quote another great show many people who read this might know"¦

"Its all how you look at the glass."


Real source is a yahoo group,so in order to see it you have to join it-->http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/Forgotten_Conscience_Productions/



SOURCE
 
I loved this article. It made me realize that the 4-5 episodes I missed were pretty darn important.

For people that don't know but want to give this show another chance, FOX is airing repeats starting in June until November. So please take the time to look at it and really appreciate the show for what it is.
 
I agree..That article isv.good and should be read by all 'Tru Calling' haters-they'd sooo change their minds
 
Back
Top Bottom