I just want to point out something more or less irrelevant but still fun: You know how they call the Twilight genre on a major Dutch books-site? "Bloody Chick-lit". I think it's fitting 😉
---------- Post added at 05:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:30 PM ----------
I know that, and I absolutely realise that I don't have a right to say anything about it because I haven't read the books. I'm therefore also trying to refrain as much as possible from comments about the content or the writing style or whatever of the books.
I have read some interviews with Meyer, though, and therefore I think I can say something about why I dislike her attitude. From comments she's made (such as the one quoted a few pages back) it shows that she basically started writing her books without having a clue about vampires, without actually especially liking the vampire-lore or any other type of folklore for that matter. Sure, vampires don't exist, but the thing is, she didn't really change or add bits or wanted to be different, but she had apparently no clue what it was she was being 'different' from and she just completely reinvented them without showing any interest in or respect for or knowledge of an easy to access (through the miracles of google) and beloved by many myth.
Of course, it is not a capital crime, and not a reason to hate the books, it is a reason to dislike the woman who wrote them and since I'm a simple person, a reason to read other books instead that are written in a nice writing style, with a normal amount of adjectives, and without sparkling vampires.
Sorry! Cookie?:nibble6:
---------- Post added at 05:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:30 PM ----------
Erm, heres what bothers me.
You've not read the books nor seen the film yet you have an opinion on it.
Fact of the matter is that Vampires are not real so Meyers can, if she chooses, make up anything she likes in her fictional world.
I'm not a fan but you never know, you might like it if you give it a go.
There are many stories involving Vampires that have taken elements previously seen and changed it or expanded on them.
I think what she has chosen is silly, but I don't hold it against her that she tried to be different.
I know that, and I absolutely realise that I don't have a right to say anything about it because I haven't read the books. I'm therefore also trying to refrain as much as possible from comments about the content or the writing style or whatever of the books.
I have read some interviews with Meyer, though, and therefore I think I can say something about why I dislike her attitude. From comments she's made (such as the one quoted a few pages back) it shows that she basically started writing her books without having a clue about vampires, without actually especially liking the vampire-lore or any other type of folklore for that matter. Sure, vampires don't exist, but the thing is, she didn't really change or add bits or wanted to be different, but she had apparently no clue what it was she was being 'different' from and she just completely reinvented them without showing any interest in or respect for or knowledge of an easy to access (through the miracles of google) and beloved by many myth.
Of course, it is not a capital crime, and not a reason to hate the books, it is a reason to dislike the woman who wrote them and since I'm a simple person, a reason to read other books instead that are written in a nice writing style, with a normal amount of adjectives, and without sparkling vampires.
Ohh and Itsexy, I dislike you a little bit for making me even come close to defending that drivel!
Sorry! Cookie?:nibble6:
B
Big Damn Hero
That's ace!
B
Blondie Bear
LOL @ Bloody Chick-Lit and agree about the rest of it.