Update Upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
well, thanks for warning us! 😀
if anything goes wrong we know who to blame
jks... 😀😀😀
plz dont kill me 🙁
 
A
Aly Fan
If you're not at school, i'll know why lol!!
I'm still in the middle of things but I've turned the board back on in the interest of keeping it open as much as possible during the upgrade. So please bear with my mess while I work.

🙂
 
So far the board's changes look really cool.... I like the siggies moved down and to the side like that. 😀
 
Is there now no more height and width restriction on sigs? Cos you see, I'm okay with the make them as wide as you want, but can we get the height restriction back? Cos if everyone is going to take really long (height wise) sig pictures, it's annoying. Cos there will be sigs that are way bigger than the posts, if you see what I mean.
I like that they moved down like that, though.
 
I'm really happy with the update becuase it seems to have solved my problem! All the drop down buttons have come back and my Karma box has gone back to normal! 😀
 
What kind of upgrades? I've only noticed the sigs. What else has been done or is to come..?
 
What kind of upgrades? I've only noticed the sigs. What else has been done or is to come..?
From wiki, we were 3.7, now 3.8

Social group discussions
Social group categories
Private message sorting and filtering
Private message history
Quick edit for newer types of content (visitor messages and picture comments)
Social group icons
Social group transfers
Private message quick reply
Private message throttling (limit messages sent over a time period)
Private message reporting
Profile privacy (limit blocks to a subset of users)
Lightbox navigation
Thread prefix permissions
Dismissible notices
 
A song for ALL you people in a rush to comment

To be fair, i think this comment:

Buffy Summers said:
But things look "off" because people have used special tags in their sigs. 😀

..led us to believe the sig change was an intentional decision and not an aspect of the upgrade kinks; hence the comments associated with the sigs.
 
E
Edmund Blackadder
I know, and you're forgiven because you're new, but others who have been here through numerous upgrades should know better!
To be fair, i think this comment:


..led us to believe the sig change was an intentional decision and not an aspect of the upgrade kinks; hence the comments associated with the sigs.

And to be fair these comments:

I'm still in the middle of things but I've turned the board back on in the interest of keeping it open as much as possible during the upgrade. So please bear with my mess while I work.

🙂

Like I said, please be patient while we finish things before you comment.

Clearly tell us things aren't finished and those of us who have been around (which includes some of the posters in this thread) should, by now, know that Buffy Summers tells us when its complete.
 
S
Silum
im not disputing that (youll notice i didnt make a comment regarding the sigs), i just see where people are coming from. I look forward to seeing the end result though.
Edmund Blackadder said:
agrees: I know, and you're forgiven because you're new, but others who have been here through numerous upgrades should know better!

I hardly think i need to be forgiven. I'd imagine welcoming feedback during a forum update, complete or not. It helps establish whats working and whats not during a transition of change... if anything thats helpful no? The concept of constructive criticism does seem to be lacking on this board (evident in my 'suggestions' for the board).

Anyway, again i find myself in a tiresome argument, if you could call it that. Love ya EB 🙂
 
E
Edmund Blackadder
You're so pretty.
I SIMPLY asked for a little bit of time to get things up and running and suited to the live board before I had to sort through a hundred responses of "this looks weird". I DON'T think that is too much to ask, and if you would CARE to look, you will see that I invite constructive criticism once all the kinks have been worked out.

As for thinking that what I said meant that the signatures would be staying as is, that is not what I intended. Left aligned signatures (as my test ones were) look cleaner in this format; signatures as they were formatted for the old layout do not. It will take me a little bit of time to find a better solution, hence why I asked for time to works things out.
 
E
Edmund Blackadder
I got your back, B!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom