TriBel
Scooby
I'm honestly not sure...though only an idiot would deny the impact of reopening universities. Certainly we saw the effect in Manchester/Greater Manchester (which has a student body of over 100,000) and Liverpool (70,000) and similarly Nottingham, Leeds, Sheffield (all have at least two unis) but I don't think the causality is straightforward. You have to add in factors such as schools, retail and hospitality opening up. London has the biggest student population in the UK and they were behind the North in terms of infections/deaths. One reason is thought to be the wealth divide (the North has more people in lower status jobs where they're more likely to come into contact with each other).The second wave started to spike when the universities were reopened.
Is it (genuine question)? I wouldn't like to make a comparison in terms of infection rates because the figures are skewed by the disparity in the number of tests carried out now and at the beginning of the year. Hospital admissions are probably a good indicator. Deaths maybe less so because of comorbidity. Maybe excess deaths is a good marker?I think the virus might be starting to burn itself out. Covid is supposedly spreading faster this wave
I suspect this depends on how "stupid" the virus is and its ability to mutate. A strain that's killing its host is a bit "thick" because it can't reproduce. This leaves the field open to mutations that don't easily kill the host and so do reproduce - in Darwinian terms, "fitter". I'm not sure where we're up to with the number of strains (13 was the last figure I saw). That aside, isn't the jury out on immunity?it runs out of people to infect which sort of kills it off because people develop immunity.
It occurs to me that responses to Covid - and I mean by the populace rather than Governments - could well fall under the label of "Urban Myth" (@Sparky beat me to it). Why the "debunking" of science? Why the rise in "conspiracy" theories? I'll be perfectly frank...I'm usually loath to accept anything Boris says as truth but I'd take his word over and above that of someone like David Icke. Myths and legends happen for a reason...myth was the way the ancients made sense of the world. Science and the Enlightenment were meant to free us from the irrationality of myth (though I'm quite happy to take the stance that Enlightenment itself is another form of myth). In short, and trying to keep this as apolitical as possible, why do people "believe"? Personally, I'd have to take a massive leap of faith to subscribe to the NWO, Bill Gates, mark of the beast etc. etc. narrative.
Last edited: