I get how piracy is a big problem for the entertainment industry. I'm so not the most knowledgeable on this subject, but while I'm not necessarily for this bill, I'm definitely not surprised it's being put forward. This is another step being taken by the entertainment industry to fight the change in how media is shared around the world. For example, there are a ton of musicians who, while not rolling in the dough, have opted for label-free albums because signing under a record company often means they give up the right to do what they want with their music. If an artist just wrote up a little song that they want to share with their fans on YouTube or whatever, which they don't plan on putting on their album, they often can't as a part of the contract they signed. I know musicians like Amanda Palmer refused to write a single new song until Roadrunner Records decided to drop her.
Sorry for the tangent, but anyway, the Entertainment business sees that there is a change in the way people want to obtain/view/share content, and they're fighting against it. This bill seems to be just another way for them to do that. It's understandable, but I don't think this is the way to go about doing that.
This bill is a way for the entertainment industry to get richer. I have no sympathy for the fat cats getting fatter and using our freedoms to do it.
This bill will give the US gov the power to censor the internet just like they do in Iran and China.
They will also be able to shut down any website without trial - any small company shut down that does not have the money to fight it will simply not be able to do biz on the web anymore
If you are a political group say, I don't know, Occupy Wallstreet or a subversive political candidate and the government wants you to go away, they can just shut down your websites - no trial, no charges, nothing.
This bill encourages other companies to rat out companies who use "so-called" piracy by penalizing anyone who knows of this piracy and does not report it (ever heard of McCarthyism?)
I don't understand much about internet technology but from what I've heard, the bill prevents free exchange of information, therefore inhibiting educational sites like Wikipedia and hindering the development of new computer technology.
These things are not necessary to protect poor defenseless "hollywood" it is destructive to the very fabric of what makes the internet and goes against the "freedom" that the US is supposed to stand for
At least this is my understanding, whoa, heavy stuff
😱
---------- Post added at 01:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:58 AM ----------
I don't like it one bit. The internet is a lot less dirty/sketch than it used to be, that's for sure. It seems pretty unnecessary, and as someone else said before, poorly thought out. Isn't there a way that they can crack down on all of the child porn sites or something? I mean why can't they keep track of those sites? Why can't they just outlaw them? I'm actually pretty confused. I'm not entirely sure what the exact point of the bill is. I'm just making slightly uneducated guesses.
Not saying that you look for it or anything, but when's the last time you saw child porn on the internet - it is illegal. This is just propaganda.
---------- Post added at 01:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:00 AM ----------
All right, piracy is a problem for the entertainment business. But it's not like they're starvig to death, is it?
No, they have so much extra cash that they can pay an actor 20 million $$ for 6 weeks of work. They have so much cash that they can pay to have outrageous legislation pushed through Congress and choose who gets elected to office. They have enough money to make people believe that they are poor defenseless "artists" who are being cheated out of well deserved money. This whole thing is a bunch of hooey.