what should Tony Blair do about Iraq???

C

carlyh

Slave to angels passion
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Messages
1,106
Age
41
Location
england, north west
what does everyone think about what Tony Blair & President Bush should do about Saddam Hussein? do you think that they should take military action? what this result in an all out war?
please i'm very interested in your views both from america and the U.k.
 
This is a really important issue and to be honest i don't think I know enough about it to really say. Even though I have heard bout it all week on the news lol. I don't want to go to war but then i also think that they shouldn' get away with terroism.
 
Regardless, of whether or not, Tony Blair decides to help the USA, Iraq is a threat to the world and something most be done. I mean, contrary to poplular belief, dictators are not the friendliest people in the world.
 
I just hope we dont go to war, i dont know a whole lot i just learn what i learn from the press which is never a good thing. Seems bush is all set to go in and blair is following behind him, hope they get them inspectors in b4 hand. Too many innocents will die and i doubt all those terriosts will ignore it either
 
I personally think Bush is way to war-happy. He seems to think the solution to any problem is to bomb it away. Even our prime minister Jean Chretien (a complete idiot) doesn't agree that bombing Iraq is going to solve the problem. I have no clue what the solution is to this situation but I don't think going to war is going to solve anything.
 
It's no so much that Bush is "war-happy." It is just after Sept 11. this country is not going to take anymore **** from our enemies. Just like Israeli. They learned their lesson with the Holocaust. There are people in the world who absolutely hate that country just because they are Jews, and why should they just sit around twiddling their thumbs so inncent people can be killed? Their national policy is to destroy their enemies before anymore of their people are killed. The same should be for--not only this country, but for France and England and Canada and the rest of the world. Why should we let these people exsist when they threaten to kill innocent people? Why should we stick around and wait for our enemies to attack us? People are foolish to believe that if you just ignore people like Hitler and the Munich Agreement (hello...did ever attend Sunnydale High and get their History lesson from Cordelia?) and let people who threaten the world stability be around? And believe, your prime minister would love to see Saddam gone--the only thing is he doesn't have the strength to do it. But, secretly, he'll give us the help that the United States because these people hate the freedom and opportunity the Canada has too...
 
I think they shouldn't rush into war without UN support though. I don't want to be involved in a war, Bush seems too keen on war and thats a bit scary to be honest.
 
I know innocents will be killed---as long as Saddam is still in charge! As for the U.N., those people who need the support of the U.N. is just political cover. I mean would Winston Churchill ever go to the U.N? I mean you do know who Winston Churchill is, right??
 
I'm not saying we should just leave Hussein. I'm just saying rushing into war isn't the brightest idea. MORE people will be killed if we do that.
 
Yeah obviously i know who winston churchill is. All I'm saying is that the world and society has completely changed since then. I personally don't want to get involved in a war with Iraq with only the support of the americans. The UN is there for a reason. Plus i don't want to see innocent people being killed. ::thumb::
 
we should not go to war with out real reason that dosent include blair saying "um they might get more weapons"

i think they just want the oil

if blair wants a war fine

just not in our name
 
(People are foolish to believe that if you just ignore people like Hitler and the Munich Agreement (hello...did ever attend Sunnydale High and get their History lesson from Cordelia?) a little condescending me thinks.
So many different things have happened regarding munich that us europeans find it difficult to single out different things they may only teach that little bit in america but were taught a lot more about europe cos thats where were from. Usually me and u agrees on everything, but not this im afraid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom