Which Highly Rated Movies You Can't Stand

vellavu

Scooby
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
3,114
Black Thorn
This is what I can think of in a short time. From my uneducated eyes:

  • Anything Kubrick managed to deliver. (No tension. Cinematic porn.)
  • Anything Ghibli studio managed to deliver. (Heavy-handed preaching. Cheap fake "Exotic eastern culture" exploitation. Tons of terrific music wasted in it.)
  • Life of Pi. (Cinematic porn.)
  • Shutter Island. (Open ending with mental illness stereotypes! How original! The abrupt switching destroyed the natural movie flow as well. No matter if it's intentional I dislike that.)
  • Most movies Tarantino pulled off except Pulp Fiction. (No tension. Using techniques of animes/cartoons badly. Random trash-talks don't contribute to characters at all.)
 
Inglorious Basterds (Christoph Waltz is excellent in it but Brad Pitt is at a career worst).

No Country For Old Men (Boring. Minimalism done badly)

The Exoricist (not scary)

The Cider House Rules (saw this highly regarded film recently. Sentimental rubbish)
 
ILLYRIAN
ILLYRIAN
which Exorcist 1, 2 or 3?
Overrated:

Anything Tarantino except Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs. I like his colorful style of moviemaking, but as @vellavu mentioned, very little of the dialogue contributes to anything and many of the scenes don't make sense. In Kill Bill we spend at least five minutes on a shot of the Bride's feet and in Part 2, after what feels like an hour long conversation with Bill, we don't even get the badass fight we were promised -- rather, she gives him the Five Point Exploding Heart technique or whatever it was called, he takes six steps, drops the c-bomb, and dies.

Kubrick's 2001 and Full Metal Jacket. 2001 is a bunch of boring hogwash; not sure why this is considered such a cinematic landmark by anyone except special effects enthusiasts. FMJ's first half is good, but after R. Lee Ermey and Vincent D'Onofrio are killed off the film loses its initial momentum. Even Adam Baldwin can't liven things up.

Not too big a fan of the original Alien, either. Too slow and not scary. Aliens, on the other hand, is much much better.

The 1978 Dawn of the Dead. I honestly liked the 2004 version more (I hated the running zombies, but I was willing to overlook that because the story was actually interesting). In Romero's film, the zombies are portrayed almost comically; I burst into laughter during that early sequence where Peter and Roger are running through the mall collecting items and the corny music is playing on the loudspeakers... Only part I liked were the biker gang. Night of the Living Dead was better, despite the cheesier-looking effects, and because the zombies were actually scary.

The Dark Knight Rises: Too slow and unmoving. Couldn't take Bane that seriously, either.

Birdman: Slow, stilted, tonally dim... the cast did a good job, and props to the director and cinematographer, but I never got caught up in the story and totally missed the overall point of it.

Gravity: An hour and a half of Sandra Bullock floating through space. Oh, and George Clooney shows up, too.

Fargo: Why this one is considered 'an American classic' absolutely blows my mind. I didn't find it funny at all, and the murder story was too cut and paste for me to take it seriously. Frances McDormand is a good actress, but her character was extremely one-dimensional; the only characters I enjoyed most were the pair of crooks played by Steve Buscemi and Peter Stormare.

Animal House: Not as funny as it's purported to be.

Hollywoodland: Good cast, not much else.

The Untouchables: Same as above. Andy Garcia and Robert De Niro are wasted beyond belief. Sean Connery steals the show.
 
The Exoricist (not scary)

I think, at the time, it would have been very scary to see. I think I've seen it so many times, and have seen some even scarier modern films, it doesn't have the original effect others may have felt at its time of release. The Exorcist III though, that's much scarier for me, and has also aged better too.
 
Anything Ghibli studio managed to deliver. (Heavy-handed preaching. Cheap fake "Exotic eastern culture" exploitation.

Er, they're making movies rooted in their own culture. It might seem exotic to western audiences, but that's not who they're making them for.
 
I think, at the time, it would have been very scary to see.

I expected it to be disturbing at the very least. Something that might live up to its reputation as one of the scariest movies of all time.
But it doesn't even work on a thematic level as a battle against good and evil, its shallow. It's supposed to be iconic. I was so disappointed. 🙁 (this emoticon doesn't do my disappointment justice. It would have to be bigger, or perhaps crying)
 
The book was excellent, really enjoyed it. It's why I watched the movie.
 
GwenRaiden
GwenRaiden
The book is better.
crazysoulless
crazysoulless
I was just about to suggest the book and then you mentioned it.
Er, they're making movies rooted in their own culture. It might seem exotic to western audiences, but that's not who they're making them for.
They are not. I came from eastern Asia so I may see what happens here a little more.

Japanese culture is rather complicated. Ghibli used some generic trendy topics (harmonization of men and Gaia as a biggest recurring cliche), then patched some "Japanese" symbols on them. It's intentionally fulfilling the imagination of an eastern culture of western people.

And yes. I can see from many places that they had (western) award baiting in mind when producing their movies.

I'm from China and I saw a lot of Chinese movie writer/directors doing it too. They just did their job so horribly that they are basically embarrassing themselves.

Both Japan and Korea are making tons of top-notch stuff truly rooted in their own culture. The culture was modernized, not something romanticizing samurais or bowmen or Shinto temples or haiku. It has anime magical girls and easternized lovecraftian horrors and huge robots and some conceptual groundbreaking movies such as The Chaser (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

China has none yet. Don't trust any "Chinese culture" based entertainment products. They are offending both eastern and western audiences. I don't think the situation would be any better in, say, 10 years.
 
Huh, I have no problem with everybody expressing their opinions, and I find it pretty interesting to see what everybody has to say about movies that are generally regarded as great, not least because there are quite a few that I don't like either, but I'm a little disappointed by the amount of so-called "hating" going on here. Like, for example, if you don't like Tarantino or Kubrick, please don't state your opinion as fact (e.g. "No tension. Cinematic porn." or "2001 is a bunch of boring hogwash"). If there's one thing I hate, it is discussing movies or music as if there was one right opinion and everybody else is wrong. Your opinion is not the only one there is, so be respectful of others.
 
If there's one thing I hate, it is discussing movies or music as if there was one right opinion and everybody else is wrong. Your opinion is not the only one there is, so be respectful of others.
I know what you mean. But I guess in this thread, every sentence automatically has an implicit "I think" attached on, right? I think only in scientific/math discussions people are in a context of talking about objective truths. In other situations, we do not need to make explicit each time something is a personal opinion.
 
JCoatsworth
JCoatsworth
You're probably right, but I still think it's kind of annoying. But whatever.
E.T.
I remember as a wee lad watching it at the movies and getting kicked out for laughing and making jokes. I thought it was overrated then and still think it. I don't like Reese's because of ET.
 
GwenRaiden
GwenRaiden
"wee lad" made me laugh. I cannot imagine you saying that.
Every James Bond movie ever.
Titanic
The Shawshank Redemption
Cruel Intentions
 
All of the Bourne films. 😳

A lot of Lars von Trier's stuff.

The Odd Couple.

The Pianist.
 
Taake
Taake
The Pianist, you're killing me!
The Virgin Suicides.

This is England.

Kramer vs. Kramer.

Gladiator.

Forrest Gump.

Rocky.
 
thetopher
thetopher
1000 times Forrest Gump. Agreed.
I'd like to second everything Kubrick, Inception, No Country for Old Men and add everything Tim Burton.

I know what you mean. But I guess in this thread, every sentence automatically has an implicit "I think" attached on, right? I think only in scientific/math discussions people are in a context of talking about objective truths. In other situations, we do not need to make explicit each time something is a personal opinion.

Yes, this thread is clearly about people's opinions and no one is saying other people's opinions aren't valid. It's about movies you personally don't like for your own individual reasons.
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
I forgot Tim Burton.. wish I could forgot again.
Back
Top Bottom