Gum Gnome33
"Well, yeah..."
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,148
In my experience, not prioritizing the message is directly related to shows being bad. If you don't know what you want to say, then what you do say tends to lack any meaning. I think the key ingredient to any artistic works, is sincerity. Even if the show doesn't have an answer for its internal conflicts, well offer that up.
This is such a great point. 100%. And it's true, the show really does prioritize the message--or it feels as though it genuinely tries to--when it comes to Buffy resuming her relationship, (even friendship), with Angel. We get lots of discussion, lots of decision making, and lots of (appropriate) dissent from Giles and Xander. I suppose this really does go a long way.
Positive message? No, absolutely not. But a responsible message? Absolutely.......
It didn't try to say who was right or wrong. It just was the truth. If (once again using the SR example) BTVS had been honest with the AR, and showed both sides, then it would have been a totally different experience and arguably, better TV. BSG tackled the issue and in contrast they managed to create an episode of TV that was appropriately and insistently clear that rape was wrong, but also it invested in the story enough to make it an exploration of humanity and morality. That, to me, is tackling the hard issues and retaining artistic integrity.
Ok, good. I totally agree here. Initially I misunderstood you and @AlwaysBangel--I was thinking that you were advocating for a positive message, only. And as we've said, "positive" is entirely relative, anyway. Responsible, genuine, honest. Couldn't agree more. Honestly, I think that if Buffy were on HBO or Showtime, they'd have done a much better job at all of it. Truly some of the most troubling storylines are rushed--and moreso at the end of the series when they know they're about to go off air.
R
Robb Stark
[No message]