Why the huge Spike hate?

Status
Not open for further replies.
As to why they portrayed the Buffybot as being such a total air head, remember who programed it. Warren wasn't what you would call deeply insightful in actual female behavior. All of his bots acted that way.

Yeah, but Warren managed to program his own Warren!Bot robot pretty damn well. It was good enough that he was able to fool Buffy, Willow and Xander for a long time. He fooled them enough that they tracked the damn bot all over the city. Clearly he's capable of programming his bots to be completely lifelike. He - or Spike - made the choice to have Buffy!Bot and April act the way they did.
 
Skanky Vamp
Skanky Vamp
Exactly ... Spike wanted (at least at that time) the body of Buffy with the personality of Harmony.
I think the point is that he tried. They were together on the street, he wants Buffy to trust him so he can help her- there's nobody around so why try and decieve her? He told her in the end only because he had no choice- his 'costume' had failed and he was broken so he revealed all to her (almost literally).

As for that scene at the Bronze, Spike could've walked away from Anya or shouted at her to stop, or at least try and change the subject. Attacking her seems really harsh (I can't even recall if he knew that Anya was a vengeance demon at this point. If he didn't that it's even more serious) and then he goes and turns on Buffy.

It's just a really unpleasent scene that I find hard to care about, add to that the church finale and it's all seems like blatent manipulation, 'Spike is a victim now so just cut him some slack already.'

Because he wanted to help her - not manipulate her into getting closer to him. Would you really have preferred he said "Oh, Buffy I have changed. Yes, I went to Africa and went through pain and trials and won my soul fro you so now you can trust me!"
 
Wesley Pryce
Wesley Pryce
[No message]
not manipulate her into getting closer to him.
But thats exactly what he did. Ole Spike is a wily snake. He knew by pulling away from Buffy, just showing her enough and pulling away and retreating that it would actually draw HER to him. Of course he manipulated her into getting closer to him!! The whole Morrissey act was to get her intrigued by him and wonder what's going on.

I'm not saying he's wrong for what he did, it worked perfectly, but of course he did it on purpose as a means to manipulate her. He, like everyone else, knew that Buffy had to be all up in everyones business, of course she could be drawn in closer.
 
Okay, I'm stepping in. Watch out!! 😛

I don't hate Spike, exactly, though some of my previous posts may be contrary to that, but it's more of a disappointment I have towards him.

I came into the fandom in the middle of S3...right around the time that "Lover's Walk" aired. Spike was hilarious in that episode. Then, and this was during the time of VHS tapes 😛, I grabbed hold of some Buffy box-sets of S2 episodes and I got hooked on Spike and on the Spike/Dru pairing [still prefer S/D].

He was a badass and he was confident [not to mention I ADORED his leather duster]. The in S4 the writers 'neutered' him by giving him a chip and, well, though he was still interesting...he wasn't the same Spike that I loved back in S2 and S3.

And he only got worse [in MY eyes]. The writers wrote him as having a crush on Buffy in S5 and in S6 they wrote him as falling in love with her [not that I'd know as I skipped over a bunch of episodes in Season Sex...er, Six].

I'm pretty sure the one time I really enjoyed scenes with him and Buffy - post S3 - was in S7 where he went looking for Buffy and she was in somebody else's house and all she wanted was for him to hold her.

My so-called hatred of Spike was brought on by the disappointment of where the writers took him as a character. Yes, they had to take him in this direction otherwise he would've been dead dead a long time ago, but I preferred him in S2 [as well as in Angel S5].
 
But thats exactly what he did. Ole Spike is a wily snake. He knew by pulling away from Buffy, just showing her enough and pulling away and retreating that it would actually draw HER to him. Of course he manipulated her into getting closer to him!! The whole Morrissey act was to get her intrigued by him and wonder what's going on.

I'm not saying he's wrong for what he did, it worked perfectly, but of course he did it on purpose as a means to manipulate her. He, like everyone else, knew that Buffy had to be all up in everyones business, of course she could be drawn in closer.

It worked so well that she left him in the basement for a few months. 😕
I don't think wily was in him - or he would have had a much better plan than hitting Anya - kind of basic instinct with him. 
Okay, I'm stepping in. Watch out!! 😛

I don't hate Spike, exactly, though some of my previous posts may be contrary to that, but it's more of a disappointment I have towards him.

I came into the fandom in the middle of S3...right around the time that "Lover's Walk" aired. Spike was hilarious in that episode. Then, and this was during the time of VHS tapes 😛, I grabbed hold of some Buffy box-sets of S2 episodes and I got hooked on Spike and on the Spike/Dru pairing [still prefer S/D].

He was a badass and he was confident [not to mention I ADORED his leather duster]. The in S4 the writers 'neutered' him by giving him a chip and, well, though he was still interesting...he wasn't the same Spike that I loved back in S2 and S3.

And he only got worse [in MY eyes]. The writers wrote him as having a crush on Buffy in S5 and in S6 they wrote him as falling in love with her [not that I'd know as I skipped over a bunch of episodes in Season Sex...er, Six].

I'm pretty sure the one time I really enjoyed scenes with him and Buffy - post S3 - was in S7 where he went looking for Buffy and she was in somebody else's house and all she wanted was for him to hold her.

My so-called hatred of Spike was brought on by the disappointment of where the writers took him as a character. Yes, they had to take him in this direction otherwise he would've been dead dead a long time ago, but I preferred him in S2 [as well as in Angel S5].

I know a lot of people didn't like the redemption arc - just like a lot of people didn't like dark!Wes. Funny - complete reverse there, so it's not a good or evil thing. I really love kick-ass evil Spike so I can see at least part of what you're saying.
 
It worked so well that she left him in the basement for a few months.
That was only to make her feel more guilty. He was planning chess, man, not checkers. You gotta think long term strategy.

he would have had a much better plan than hitting Anya
Who hasn't wanted to hit Anya though, honesty.
 
bespangeled
bespangeled
You are awesome!
Because he wanted to help her - not manipulate her into getting closer to him.

Then the best way to help hBuffy and earn her trust quickly is to tell her what he did and that he's got a soul now- otherwise how is she ever going to trust her attempted rapist?

If the evil he's sensing is so important then Spike has to tell Buffy the TRUTH, but we can't have that for some reason, and there is no in-character reason that makes sense.

It worked so well that she left him in the basement for a few months.

I wouldn't call it months. From the end of 'Beneath Me' to the start of 'Selfless' is like two episodes in between. So I'd say a few weeks, at a stretch maybe a month.

I don't see manipulation in this episode except on the part of the writers- that's the only reason Spike wouldn't tell Buffy what happened- the writers want people to give Spike credit for not blurting out the truth right away. 'See, he doesn't want credit for going and earning his soul. What a guy.'

But it doesn't work because it doesn't make any sense in-character. The stuff surrounding it- specifically the Bronze and maybe a little bit at the church- just makes the guy look like a jerk.


But I do see guilt all over Buffy's actions- she feels responsible for Spike and so feels compelled to help him out of the basement- which is exactly what she does. So @Mr. Pole is right.
 
I see, so Spike who at this point is emotionally unbalanced due to being newly souled is apparently only doing this top get in Buffy's pants again.

Yeah, right.
 
I see, so Spike who at this point is emotionally unbalanced due to being newly souled is apparently only doing this top get in Buffy's pants again.

Uh, I never actually said anything like that. What I said was this:

I don't see manipulation in this episode except on the part of the writers

I didn't say that Spike was being manipulative, @Mr. Pole did.

Here I thought we were having a reasoned discussion about a Spike-centric scene?

Well, I should've known better. What was I thinking right? Clearly actual debating about character motivations isn't something some people are capable of. 🙄
 
Well, I should've known better. What was I thinking right? Clearly actual debating about character motivations isn't something some people are capable of. 🙄

Consider this a warning you guys;
none of this.

You all know better so please act it.
 
The Bronze
The Bronze
You're not even going to let them get a few jabs in?
Then the best way to help hBuffy and earn her trust quickly is to tell her what he did and that he's got a soul now- otherwise how is she ever going to trust her attempted rapist?

If the evil he's sensing is so important then Spike has to tell Buffy the TRUTH, but we can't have that for some reason, and there is no in-character reason that makes sense.



I wouldn't call it months. From the end of 'Beneath Me' to the start of 'Selfless' is like two episodes in between. So I'd say a few weeks, at a stretch maybe a month.

I don't see manipulation in this episode except on the part of the writers- that's the only reason Spike wouldn't tell Buffy what happened- the writers want people to give Spike credit for not blurting out the truth right away. 'See, he doesn't want credit for going and earning his soul. What a guy.'

But it doesn't work because it doesn't make any sense in-character. The stuff surrounding it- specifically the Bronze and maybe a little bit at the church- just makes the guy look like a jerk.


But I do see guilt all over Buffy's actions- she feels responsible for Spike and so feels compelled to help him out of the basement- which is exactly what she does. So @Mr. Pole is right.

Okay - why would he want her to trust him? He was last in a basement talking to people who weren't there - he has no idea what he can do. He wants to help her but he's not there to get close to her anymore. This isn't a seduction. If she wants to stake him, then fine. "Hey, BTW I've got a soul" is really the manipulative way to go because Buffy would then trust him and he had already betrayed that trust once. He didn't deserve Buffy's trust, and he knew it. A lot of people say that - I think from what he says he feels that way too. Obviously he wanted to be staked - he offers himself up easily later on.

Spike doesn't have the psychological strength that Angel has in that area - he explodes where Angel implodes. I suspect if Buffy hadn't been able to use him, he would have gone out for a walk in the sun to get away from it all. Buffy needed him, Buffy gave him purpose and direction - and then he got that sunlight walk.

He goes to Buffy to explain the evil - his soul isn't part of that. Everyone is feeling it so he knows nothing more than them.

Yeah - he does go to Xander's place then - out of the basement of crazy. He helps grab a jacket and is not seen until Sleepless. Is there any sign that Buffy was seeing him or helping him beyond that? She didn't even know that he went out at night when she saw him next.

Well, I have to say that you really have expressed that you don't like Spike in season 7. That's cool. I see him differently.
 
Last edited:
Okay - why would he want her to trust him?

Because Spike wants to be her ally. He wants to help- that requires some level of trust between the two of them otherwise Buffy's is going to be distracted with one eye on him all the damn time.

He was last in a basement talking to people who weren't there - he has no idea what he can do. He wants to help her but he's not there to get close to her anymore. This isn't a seduction. If she wants to stake him, then fine.

There are different degrees of trust in any relationship. Friends, family, co-workers, 'romantic partner'. Spike can't be her lover anymore but he can be her work collegue- that's specifically why he's there in Sunnydale.
And that's putting a positive, pro-Spike spin on things- you could also say he came back to Sunnydale to try, on some level, to re-initiate a romance with Buffy again but the First's macinations drove him crazy before anything could happen.

"Hey, BTW I've got a soul" is really the manipulative way to go because Buffy would then trust him and he had already betrayed that trust once.

How is it manipulative to tell somebody the truth? He tells Buffy at the end of the episode doesn't he? So it's moot anyway. But the way he tells her is specifically to garner as much sympathy (by the writers, not the character) as possible, blame Buffy for her past behaviour, while still casting Spike in the best light possible- a poor, broken man.

Also soulled Spike is an entirely different person in my view so no, I don't agree that he 'betrayed' Buffy because they've never actually met (just like Angelus met Buffy for the first time in 'Innocence'). Spike may have those memories, he may feel responsible but that's it. That's also how everybody else reacts when they find out- Buffy especially.

He didn't deserve Buffy's trust, and he knew it.

No, he felt it because of what the 'other guy' did. Remember that all these trust issues go away by the time 'Never Leave Me' rolls around. Spike has a soul and to everybody that's all that matters, even when he's being forced to kill people at the behest of supreme evil Buffy still trusts him and 'believes' in him.

A lot of people say that - I think from what he says he feels that way too. Obviously he wanted to be staked - he offers himself up easily later on.

I disagree, his guilt is only later on and triggered primarily by his killling spree- the fact that he's unknowingly killed and turned a dozen or so people. That's why he wants Buffy to stake him, but before? I don't see it.

Spike doesn't have the psychological strength that Angel has in that area - he explodes where Angel implodes.

*sigh* Why are we dragging Angel into this again?
Fine, Angel 'explodes' when he fires his staff, when he discovers that Wesley has betrayed him, Spike was 'imploding' in the basement all on his own. There's no hard and fast rule with these two. They can go either way.

He goes to Buffy to explain the evil - his soul isn't part of that. Everyone is feeling it so he knows nothing more than them.

Yes but the soul is 'trust', at least in regards to Buffy- we are shown this later on.
So why doesn't Spike say anything, he doesn't have to take any credit, just say 'I got a soul so I wouldn't try and do that terrible thing like I did before. I've changed Buffy, but I'm just here to help.'
That's not manipulation, that's constructivly trying to build a different kind of relationship so he can help, not distract.

Yeah - he does go to Xander's place then - out of the basement of crazy. He helps grab a jacket and is not seen until Sleepless. Is there any sign that Buffy was seeing him or helping him beyond that? She didn't even know that he went out at night when she saw him next.

My point is that Buffy didn't leave him in the school basement for months like you stated, she says for Spike to stay with one of her friends- presumably so she can keep and eye on him (or Xander can). She could've just moved him back to his old crypt, or maybe a motel but instead Spike is kept within her circle of friends.

I still say that Buffy feels strong guilt/obligation for Spike and that is her primary motivation for the first half of the season. She doesn't want his soul search (and incidentally their whole S6 relationship) to be in vain.

Well, I have to say that you really have expressed that you don't like Spike in season 7. That's cool. I see him differently.

I've simply expressed an opinion and backed it up with examples from the show. I honestly don't understand what's wrong with that, this is a board where we all come to discuss/debate.
I have made no secret that I dislike the character of Spike in S6/7, but I have legitimate reasons and have stated them.
 
You prefer Bangel to Spuffy? No problem.

You think Spuffy fans are insane? Yeah, that's the crazy wing on the Spuffy side but it isn't the character on the show. (There's a crazy Bangel side too - not sure about the rest).

You think the show threw everything that was good away to follow Spike? Again - not a problem - but that was also not the character on the show. It was producers, writers, directors, even networks.

You think Spike never cared about Dawn and only took care of her after Buffy died to get into Buffy's decaying buried body. That's huge hate - and seriously kinky.

You think Spike is what destroyed the show, the universe, and more. He's worse than the black plague and political advertisements. Your blood boils and you see red if his name is spoken. Huge hate.

So - I love Spike but he is definitely very flawed. Tell me why you hate him - and be specific. I know I'll be asking questions, trying to pin this whole phenomena down.

You may want to take a deep breath or two and edit before you post.

Back to the original question...

I know that this isn't actually an answer from within the story, so some might consider it invalid, but it seems pretty obvious to me that the primary reason for all the Spike hate AND the Spike love boils down to a simple thing. Joss and the writers created a character, and James portrayed that character perfectly, who makes people care. Love him or hate him, you wouldn't have felt that way unless you actually did see Spike as a real character, and more, a character who you either want to burn at the stake, or invite home for Christmas dinner. More than even that we have the actual desire to attack or defend him whenever we find someone who doesn't share our opinion. How many other fictional characters retain this sort of loyalty or dislike so long after the role and the series has ended?

Angel has had a history every bit as varied as Spike, if not more so. By his own admission, he has killed more people than the plague, and did it with a song in his heart. soulless monster and ensouled hero, the Slayer's lover, champion and Big Bad, just like Spike, Angel has been all of those things. And yet, very few fans have the same raging desire to attack or defend Angel that they feel for Spike. Some fans find his love for Buffy absolutely boring, but very few actually get angry every time that they kiss, or try to come up with reasons why, when Buffy told him that she loved him, she didn't actually mean it.

It's been pointed out many time here that we don't have this kind of hostility about Oz and Tara or Cordy and Anya. Some people prefer Fred with Gunn, and others swear that Wes was her one true soul mate, but we've never had such a difference of opinion over either of those ships that the Mods have had to threaten to close down a thread if hostilities don't cease.

Love him or hate him, the fact remains that, for a large number of fans, Spike is one of the most memorable characters in the Buffyverse.
 
bespangeled
bespangeled
[No message]
Because Spike wants to be her ally. He wants to help- that requires some level of trust between the two of them otherwise Buffy's is going to be distracted with one eye on him all the damn time.

We are talking about Spike here - the unflappable paragon of civil sensible planning. Not all that much really. Buffy makes that choice without coercion. He tried to coerce her once - tried to force physically too. Didn't go well for either of them.

There are different degrees of trust in any relationship. Friends, family, co-workers, 'romantic partner'. Spike can't be her lover anymore but he can be her work collegue- that's specifically why he's there in Sunnydale.
And that's putting a positive, pro-Spike spin on things- you could also say he came back to Sunnydale to try, on some level, to re-initiate a romance with Buffy again but the First's macinations drove him crazy before anything could happen.

I believe the second one. He thought if he could prove himself safe, to his standards, then maybe...but once he got his soul he knew he really was beneath her. But he still needs to make reparation - and that need comes with the soul.


How is it manipulative to tell somebody the truth? He tells Buffy at the end of the episode doesn't he? So it's moot anyway. But the way he tells her is specifically to garner as much sympathy (by the writers, not the character) as possible, blame Buffy for her past behaviour, while still casting Spike in the best light possible- a poor, broken man.

I thought we both felt that bringing in the writers was sloppy arguing.
My view - he thought he could hold it together and he couldn't. He freaked and ran away, took off the costume. He told her, and he was half crazy and desperate. I assume Buffy left shortly after, and she hadn't seen him for whatever period of time between episodes.


Also soulled Spike is an entirely different person in my view so no, I don't agree that he 'betrayed' Buffy because they've never actually met (just like Angelus met Buffy for the first time in 'Innocence'). Spike may have those memories, he may feel responsible but that's it. That's also how everybody else reacts when they find out- Buffy especially.

Well, I think Spike does feel responsible - and he doesn't agree that Angelus wasn't. At least at that time. He's kinda all over the place with that one - still figuring it out in Damage.


No, he felt it because of what the 'other guy' did. Remember that all these trust issues go away by the time 'Never Leave Me' rolls around. Spike has a soul and to everybody that's all that matters, even when he's being forced to kill people at the behest of supreme evil Buffy still trusts him and 'believes' in him.

Yeah, after Spike admits he killed, turned and buried - and it's a trap. He goes vamp, next trap, then he is completely startled by tasting Buffy's blood, begs to be staked, and explains what is going on as far as he knows. - Buffy trusts him enough to tie him up and try to find out what he knows. When he shows he can break the chair and attack, she kicks him in the head and chains him in the basement. Where - once he knows he can be triggered he begs her to kill him, and tries to taunt her into staking him. But she won't because he has a soul. He knows what he can do if that demon is triggered and has no chip and he wants her to stake him.

That's exactly why he didn't want to tell her earlier. He wants her free to stake him. It seemed the idea that she would believe in him was not really something he had considered. And then he was able to survive the First. Torture does give you confidence in your ability to control.


I disagree, his guilt is only later on and triggered primarily by his killling spree- the fact that he's unknowingly killed and turned a dozen or so people. That's why he wants Buffy to stake him, but before? I don't see it.

Obviously he wanted to be staked - he offers himself up easily later on - this is the later on portion I was referring to.

*sigh* Why are we dragging Angel into this again?
Fine, Angel 'explodes' when he fires his staff, when he discovers that Wesley has betrayed him, Spike was 'imploding' in the basement all on his own. There's no hard and fast rule with these two. They can go either way.

BECAUSE I SHIP THEM! They are connected in my mind, they have a long history, and they are the only regular characters that have this bond. Why is this a bad thing? Hell, I started an entire thread on the idea that saying something good about one is not an attack on the other! I know there are other characters that people ship that show up in threads - Faith, Anya, Buffy, etc - that aren't about them. Never heard anyone object to that! I ship them - I love them both. They are very different in some ways. I analyze and compare. One brings the other to mind and the analysis here tends to do that

Angel implodes - I would mean the cold way he fired them - the darkness inside that he allows to rise as he plans. Spike explodes - "Spike: “What’s this? Sitting around watching the telly while there’s evil still a foot. (Turns the TV off) That’s not very industrious of you. I say we go out there (Rubs his hands together) and kick a little demon ass! (Xander and Willow stare at him) What, can’t go without your Buffy, is that it? To chicken? Let’s find her! She is the Chosen One after all. – Come on! Vampires! Grrr! Nasty! Let’s annihilate them. For justice - and for - the safety of puppies – and Christmas, right? Let’s *fight* that evil! - Let’s *kill* something! (Fade to black) Oh, come *on*!”. He uses his energy in a different way.



Yes but the soul is 'trust', at least in regards to Buffy- we are shown this later on.
So why doesn't Spike say anything, he doesn't have to take any credit, just say 'I got a soul so I wouldn't try and do that terrible thing like I did before. I've changed Buffy, but I'm just here to help.'
That's not manipulation, that's constructivly trying to build a different kind of relationship so he can help, not distract.

He doesn't trust himself. He wants her to make her own choice on what to do with him.

My point is that Buffy didn't leave him in the school basement for months like you stated, she says for Spike to stay with one of her friends- presumably so she can keep and eye on him (or Xander can). She could've just moved him back to his old crypt, or maybe a motel but instead Spike is kept within her circle of friends.

Okay - there are all sorts of ways the episodes date. In Ats, between two and three Wesley says a month passed. In another it was days. So let's just agree to disagree since canon conflicts. No set time unless expressed. And yes - she puts him in with the Xander who can be voted the Scooby most likely to stake. Who reviles the idea itself. Okay, it's definitely a step above the basement but not really in the bosom. And he could have moved back to the crypt at any time, anyway. Now that he was out of the basement and feeling more sane he could leave but he stays because she put him there.

I still say that Buffy feels strong guilt/obligation for Spike and that is her primary motivation for the first half of the season. She doesn't want his soul search (and incidentally their whole S6 relationship) to be in vain.

She probably does feel guilt. Buffy accepts that she was half of the problem in the relationship. That she was depressed and went and played sex games with an unsouled demon who could hurt her, who had a demon love for her (obsession, controlling, etc), who was amazingly hot for her, and who she hated, who she felt was everything wrong in the world, and who she could never love.

I've simply expressed an opinion and backed it up with examples from the show. I honestly don't understand what's wrong with that, this is a board where we all come to discuss/debate.
I have made no secret that I dislike the character of Spike in S6/7, but I have legitimate reasons and have stated them.

Hey, reread - this is what I was saying too! Is cool!😕
 
So, to recap your position- Spike went to Buffy not just to help her (which is what he says) but also because he doesn't trust himself and maybe wants her to stake him?

That really doesn't make any sense. 😕

If Spike doesn't trust himself and thinks he's dangerous then he should stay away from Buffy- but he's actually trying here. Spike goes to Buffy in this instance because he thinks he's got it together enough to help her- he does his hair, puts on a costume, talks rationally and yet he still won't tell her the truth about his condition- it's illogical. i.e he trusts himself enough that he think he can be an ally but doesn't tell Buffy why.

It turns out he's wrong but I still don't see anywhere that he wants to die, that he wants to be killed before 'Sleeper/Never Leave Me'- initially he wants to be made to forget the things he did:
(from Sleeper)

SPIKE: I don't know. Please, I don't remember. Don't make me remember. (called to empty space) Make it so I forget again! I did what you wanted!

But when this can't happen then he wants to be staked- it's the memories, the realisation about what he's done (or being made to do) that are overwhelming him with guilt at this point. Not before and not after (as in a few episodes later).

I thought we both felt that bringing in the writers was sloppy arguing.

In this instance I wasn't using the writers to bolster any arguement (like say, as character explanation/plot contrivance) I was just saying that it was poorly wriiten, badly executed, and manipulative scene.
It was a classic example of ignoring the golden rule of writing 'Show don't tell', infer don't beat people over the head with it. Criticizing the writing is fine outside a specific discussion.

BECAUSE I SHIP THEM! They are connected in my mind, they have a long history, and they are the only regular characters that have this bond. Why is this a bad thing? Hell, I started an entire thread on the idea that saying something good about one is not an attack on the other! I know there are other characters that people ship that show up in threads - Faith, Anya, Buffy, etc - that aren't about them. Never heard anyone object to that! I ship them - I love them both. They are very different in some ways. I analyze and compare.

Okay, firstly calm down. I'm just saying that I'm used to so many, many discussions that drag Angel in at the first opportunity during a Spike-centric debate when it has nothing to do with anything, like in this case.
But fine, Angel and Spike are the most important vamps on both shows. That we can agree on at least, but in this instance I don't see how Angel is at all relevent to the discussion and leave it at that.

I'll leave it by saying that to me in 'Beneath Me' Spike's actions are portayed as utterly calculating up to a certain point, (initial approach of Buffy) then he deliberately 'lets his demon out' to hide the truth of his condition (in the Bronze) and then he spectacularly falls apart and reveals the truth.

I don't find any of these particular stages interesting (I know that he's got a soul), enlightening (I don't know why he acts as he does at the Bronze- to choose to act that way...) or sympathetic (the speech in the church makes me so very angry).
 
"My view - he thought he could hold it together and he couldn't. He freaked and ran away, took off the costume. He told her, and he was half crazy and desperate. I assume Buffy left shortly after, and she hadn't seen him for whatever period of time between episodes.

Well you're not the only one. That was my impression too but then I suspect a persons view is coloured by wether you actually like the character or not.

Oh and White Avenger, brilliant summing up there. 😀
 
This is how I originally read it:
thetopher said:
Spike goes to Buffy in this instance because he thinks he's got it together enough to help her- he does her hair, puts on a costume
I like my version better. Girltime!
 
i think Spike fans are making a big deal about the so called hate. There are very few people who dislike Spike, very few. Here on this thread i might only point to one. Spike is as hated as Angel or any other character. Does he has flaws?, oh yes, his biggest one is he doesnt atone much for past sins nor seems to care much for them, other than that he's a pretty cool character.

People who ship Buffy and Angel have no reason to hate Spike, he has nothing to do with them not being together, with Riley and Buffy is another matter. Spike is not hated in fact he might be more popular than Angel, he seems to be more talked about.
 
I agree with the above. To me Spike is no more absolutely hated than Willow or Angel or Faith- every character has their detractors and their super-fans.

All I see is that people who have a negative opinion of Spike (even if its just some of the time, like me) often have to justify why we dislike him.

Also the Buffyverse is full of lots of fantastic, memorable characters, not just Spike. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom