Uncle Rory
Potential
Either you respect him for his honesty or lose respect for his raggin on the creative team.
Without really taking sides here - and Edmund will swear that I'm probably the least likely person on the site to back him up BUT ..... the above quote is ONE of many faults in the logic of the whole thread - and a lot of people have weighed in here so just because I have made a quote I think it's indicative of the thread and of many opinions on this site. It's that it's all BLACK and WHITE, either or, and as soon as you tell me that there are only two ways to look at a particular issue I will always 100% guarantee run out and find you a third, fourth and fifth possibility.
Fact - If they gave the Kid the role then they obviously had some confidence in his abilities. If he was uncomfortable with the role then that's "Smoke." So where is the fire? In the fact that they NEVER bothered to develop the character and, like this thread, he just went around and around; interesting to watch (or read) but maybe not so much fun to do if your artistic urge as an actor is to create a "Real or realistic" character.
Fact - Famous folks get misquoted, misinterpreted and have their words taken out of context.
Fact - The written word is one dimensional communication. We do not see the body language that would help us distinguish whether he was laughingly commenting on his take on the role or angrily complaining about the role. Combine that with taking his words out of context and this is where "YOUR" i(general - anyone) interpretation comes in. And where personal preferences and prejudices come into play. It's not so much "HOW" someone says something it's how the listener "decides" to take it.
Fact - Good art, particularly film and literature show characters that could be real and / or characters who grow and change or evolve - (these points have been discussed on other threads) So the real question you have to ask yourself is - Did the writers or Joss really care about this character or did they create some bullseye character that all the blame is just thrown on, who never grows up or gets past their own BS issues? Was the character realistic?
I for one think that in the real world Connor would have committed suicide - God knows I would have put a bullet into him after about the 4th ep of season 4. I have been acussed of being "Whinny" but this kid was just TOO TOO much. He whined more than Dawn for god's sake. He whined and cried more than Kim Bassinger in Batman 1. He was more irritating than JA JA Binks. YUCH!
MY Conclusion - I back the Kid up, he did a good job but the writers DIDN't as far as his character - (and apparently in respect to the continuity of season 4 as well) I think he could have brought a lot more to the character (which really wasn't a character at all but rather a plot device) but he didn't get the chance. Does he have the right to wish that he had had more to work with? - YES. Is it selling out by going to the conventions and charging for his appearances? - Who cares - people pay to see Britney sing - it's a crazy world, guys gotta eat.
Anyone who shares my opinion that the Connor's last two appearances on Angel in Season 5 were his best would therefore logically agree with VK. The writers gave him a little more depth and he rose to the challenge.
Uncle Rory
Note; The moral of my post is that there are no absolutes. I cheerily await the hilarious reply - post in which someone argues the above with a list of absolutes. The only absolute in the universe is change.
E
Edmund Blackadder
Welcome to my world!